Liu Min, Li Linfang, Xia Yuqing, Huang Minfei, Fan Xueke, Shen Yihui
Emergency Department of Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China.
EICU of Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 25;104(30):e43456. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043456.
Intravenous infusion is a common and critical treatment modality in the emergency department. Optimizing infusion nursing quality is essential for improving patient clinical outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of positive reinforcement nursing interventions in patients receiving emergency infusions. This retrospective study included 971 patients who underwent infusion therapy in the emergency department from February 2023 to February 2024. Based on different nursing interventions, patients were divided into the experimental group (476 patients receiving positive reinforcement nursing) and the control group (495 patients receiving routine nursing). After propensity score matching, each group comprised 320 patients. Data collected included general patient information, Modified Early Warning Score, Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, Self-Rating Depression Scale, Visual Analog Scale for pain, nursing satisfaction, and Nottingham Health Profile quality of life scores. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software, with a significance level set at P < .05. Post-matching, there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the 2 groups (P > .05). On the first and third days of infusion, the experimental group exhibited significantly lower Visual Analog Scale scores compared to the control group (P < .05). Following nursing interventions, the experimental group showed significantly lower Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale scores than the control group (P < .001). Regarding infusion-related adverse events, the experimental group had a significantly lower incidence of repeated punctures and redness/swelling at the puncture site compared to the control group (P < .05). In terms of nursing satisfaction, the experimental group scored significantly higher in nursing skills, infusion room environment, and infusion management compared to the control group (P < .05). For quality of life, the experimental group had significantly lower Nottingham Health Profile scores in all dimensions except social life compared to the control group (P < .05). Positive reinforcement nursing interventions significantly reduce pain perception in emergency infusion patients, improve their psychological state, decrease the incidence of infusion-related adverse events, and enhance nursing satisfaction and quality of life. These findings highlight the clinical value of integrating positive reinforcement strategies into infusion nursing practices in emergency settings.
静脉输液是急诊科常见且关键的治疗方式。优化输液护理质量对于改善患者临床结局至关重要。本研究旨在评估正性强化护理干预对接受急诊输液患者的疗效。这项回顾性研究纳入了2023年2月至2024年2月在急诊科接受输液治疗的971例患者。根据不同的护理干预措施,将患者分为实验组(476例接受正性强化护理)和对照组(495例接受常规护理)。经过倾向得分匹配后,每组各有320例患者。收集的数据包括患者一般信息、改良早期预警评分、自评焦虑量表、自评抑郁量表、视觉模拟疼痛评分、护理满意度以及诺丁汉健康状况量表生活质量评分。使用SPSS软件进行统计分析,显著性水平设定为P < 0.05。匹配后,两组的基线特征无显著差异(P > 0.05)。在输液的第一天和第三天,实验组的视觉模拟评分显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。经过护理干预后,实验组的自评焦虑量表和自评抑郁量表评分显著低于对照组(P < 0.001)。在输液相关不良事件方面,实验组的重复穿刺及穿刺部位红肿发生率显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。在护理满意度方面,实验组在护理技能、输液室环境和输液管理方面的评分显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。在生活质量方面,实验组除社会生活维度外,其他各维度的诺丁汉健康状况量表评分均显著低于对照组(P < 0.05)。正性强化护理干预可显著降低急诊输液患者的疼痛感知,改善其心理状态,降低输液相关不良事件的发生率,并提高护理满意度和生活质量。这些研究结果凸显了将正性强化策略融入急诊输液护理实践中的临床价值。