Chatterjee Subhankar, Bhattacharjee Rana, Sinha Anirban, Maiti Animesh, Mukherjee Anustup, Ghosh Ritwik, Dubey Souvik
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, India.
Department of General Medicine, Burdwan Medical College and Hospital, Burdwan, India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jun;14(6):2527-2537. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1900_24. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
With the world's aging population, twin epidemics of type-2 diabetes (T2D) and dementia take a great toll on the healthcare burden. T2D carries a 2-3 times greater risk of developing cognitive impairment than controls. Early identification of cognitive impairment is important as it impairs diabetes self-management, making patients prone to complications. However, data about the assessment of cognitive impairment in T2D using a comprehensive cognitive battery is sparse in India. This study was undertaken to estimate the prevalence and pattern of cognitive impairment among young and middle-aged patients with T2D.
A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Kolkata (2022-2024) among 125 Bengali-speaking T2D patients with formal education > class IV, aged between 20 and 60 years. The cognitive evaluation was done using the clinical dementia rating scale, mini-mental status examination (MMSE), Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA), and Addenbrooke's cognitive examination (ACE)-III. Statistical analyses were done by Jeffrey's Amazing Statistics Program version 0.19 with appropriate tests (Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman correlation statistics, and logistic regression). value < 0.05 was considered significant.
T2D patients reported a more subjective sensation of forgetfulness compared to the control group ( = 0.001). MMSE was an insufficient screening tool to distinguish between these two groups. On MoCA and ACE-III, there was a significant difference in total scores between case and control groups (MoCA, = 0.012 and ACE-III, < 0.001). Based on ACE-III, 59.20% of T2D patients had cognitive impairment ( < 0.001). The odds of having cognitive impairment in T2D were 3.72 times higher than in the control group ( < 0.001). There was significant impairment of memory ( < 0.001), fluency ( = 0.020), and visuospatial ability ( = 0.032). Females ( = 0.010), less education ( < 0.001), lower socioeconomic status ( < 0.001), BMI < 23 kg/m ( = 0.049), peripheral neuropathy ( = 0.001), hypothyroidism ( = 0.007), anxiety ( < 0.001), and depression ( < 0.001) were significantly associated with cognitive impairment in diabetes.
This is the first study from Eastern India to use a comprehensive cognitive scale validated in the local vernacular. Cognitive impairment is prevalent among a significant portion of middle-aged, educated individuals with T2D. Cognitive evaluation should be incorporated into diabetes management from the onset, with a focus on addressing modifiable factors.
随着全球人口老龄化,2型糖尿病(T2D)和痴呆症这两大流行病给医疗负担带来了沉重压力。与对照组相比,T2D患者发生认知障碍的风险要高出2至3倍。早期识别认知障碍很重要,因为它会损害糖尿病自我管理,使患者更容易出现并发症。然而,在印度,关于使用综合认知测试组合评估T2D患者认知障碍的数据很少。本研究旨在评估年轻和中年T2D患者认知障碍的患病率及模式。
2022年至2024年期间,在加尔各答的一家三级护理教学医院对125名接受过四年级以上正规教育、年龄在20至60岁之间、说孟加拉语的T2D患者进行了一项横断面观察研究。使用临床痴呆评定量表、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)和阿登布鲁克认知检查表(ACE)-III进行认知评估。采用杰弗里神奇统计程序0.19版进行适当的统计分析(卡方检验、曼-惠特尼U检验、斯皮尔曼相关统计和逻辑回归)。P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
与对照组相比,T2D患者报告的健忘主观感受更强(P = \0.001)。MMSE作为一种筛查工具,不足以区分这两组患者。在MoCA和ACE-III上,病例组和对照组的总分存在显著差异(MoCA,P = \0.012;ACE-III,P < \0.001)。根据ACE-III,59.20%的T2D患者存在认知障碍(P < );0.001)。T2D患者发生认知障碍的几率比对照组高3.72倍(P < \0.).001)。在记忆(P < \0.001)、语言流畅性(P = \0.020)和视觉空间能力(P = \0.032)方面存在显著损害。女性(P = \0.010)、受教育程度较低(P < \0.001)、社会经济地位较低(P < \0.001)、体重指数<23 kg/m²(P = \0.049)、周围神经病变(P = \0.001)、甲状腺功能减退(P = \0.007)、焦虑(P < \0.001)和抑郁(P < \0.001)与糖尿病患者的认知障碍显著相关。
这是印度东部第一项使用当地语言验证的综合认知量表的研究。在相当一部分中年、受过教育且患有T2D的个体中,认知障碍很普遍。应从一开始就将认知评估纳入糖尿病管理,重点是解决可改变的因素。