Zhou Zhihu, Yang Xiang, Shi Min, Huang Liqiao, Wu Danping, Yang Huailong, Zhang Xu
Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin, People's Republic of China.
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Jul 24;21:1175-1186. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S507856. eCollection 2025.
Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological intervention to enhance postoperative recovery. However, its application during the post-anesthesia recovery period remains underexplored. This study investigated the impact of TEAS during the post-anesthesia recovery period on postoperative recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.
In this single-center, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial, 100 patients undergoing elective gynecological laparoscopic surgery were randomly allocated to receive either TEAS or sham stimulation at bilateral Hegu (LI4), Neiguan (PC6), Zusanli (ST36), and Sanyinjiao (SP6) acupoints for 30 minutes during the post-anesthesia recovery period in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score assessed on postoperative days (POD) 1, 2, and 3. Secondary outcomes included pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), recovery times, and adverse events.
Ninety-seven patients completed the study, with 48 in the TEAS group and 49 in the Sham group. The TEAS group exhibited significantly higher QoR-15 scores on POD 1 compared to the Sham group, with improvements in emotional state, physical comfort, and pain dimensions. On POD 2, the TEAS group had significantly higher pain dimension scores. The TEAS group also reported lower resting VAS scores on POD 1 and lower exercise VAS scores on POD 1 and 2. The incidence of PONV was lower on POD 1, with fewer patients requiring rescue antiemetics. Additionally, the TEAS group experienced shorter times to first flatus and ambulation. Adverse events were comparable between the groups, with no local skin irritation noted in the TEAS group.
TEAS applied during the post-anesthesia recovery period significantly improves early postoperative recovery quality, reduces pain and PONV, and accelerates functional recovery in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery.
经皮穴位电刺激(TEAS)已成为一种有前景的非药物干预措施,可促进术后恢复。然而,其在麻醉后恢复期间的应用仍未得到充分探索。本研究调查了麻醉后恢复期间TEAS对接受腹腔镜妇科手术患者术后恢复质量的影响。
在这项单中心、随机、双盲、假对照试验中,100例行择期妇科腹腔镜手术的患者被随机分配,在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)的麻醉后恢复期间,于双侧合谷(LI4)、内关(PC6)、足三里(ST36)和三阴交(SP6)穴位接受TEAS或假刺激30分钟。主要结局是术后第1、2和3天评估的恢复质量-15(QoR-15)评分。次要结局包括疼痛、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)、恢复时间和不良事件。
97例患者完成了研究,TEAS组48例,假刺激组49例。与假刺激组相比,TEAS组在术后第1天的QoR-15评分显著更高,在情绪状态、身体舒适度和疼痛维度方面均有改善。在术后第2天,TEAS组的疼痛维度评分显著更高。TEAS组在术后第1天的静息视觉模拟评分(VAS)也更低,在术后第1天和第2天运动VAS评分更低。术后第1天PONV的发生率更低,需要抢救性使用止吐药的患者更少。此外,TEAS组首次排气和下床活动的时间更短。两组间不良事件相当,TEAS组未观察到局部皮肤刺激。
麻醉后恢复期间应用TEAS可显著改善妇科腹腔镜手术患者的早期术后恢复质量,减轻疼痛和PONV,并加速功能恢复。