Moreira Carlos Leone Faria, da Rocha Frederico Coimbra, Medeiros Yuri de Lima, Urbano Eduardo Stehling
Department of Dental Clinic, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG Brazil.
Department of Dental Clinic, Postgraduate Studies, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG Brazil.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Aug;77(8):3290-3295. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05657-4. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
The therapeutic approach for buccosinusal fistula (BSF) requires careful consideration of factors such as infection status, bone defect size, and epithelialization. The literature describes three primary treatment options: vestibular flap, buccal fat pad, and palatal flap. This study aims to report a clinical case of recurrent BSF after five surgical interventions and review current literature on treatment modalities. A 42-year-old female patient underwent extraction of the upper left first molar, followed by alveolar bone grafting, evolving into buccosinusal communication (BSC). Over 45 days, she underwent five surgical interventions using the vestibular flap technique, which failed to prevent epithelialization and led to aesthetic and functional complications, such as facial asymmetry and displacement of the parotid papilla. As an alternative, a rotated split palatal flap was employed. After six months of follow-up, complete closure of the BSC was observed, with no signs of sinus pathology or raw areas at the donor site, indicating satisfactory healing and successful treatment. Literature shows that while vestibular flaps are commonly used, they often fail in large or recurrent defects due to tension and limited vascularization. Buccal fat pads offer good coverage but may not suffice for extensive areas. Palatal flaps stand out for their robust blood supply from the greater palatine artery, thicker tissue, and high success rates, particularly in previously treated cases. Thus, they are strongly indicated for refractory BSF cases. The palatal flap is an effective, reliable alternative for BSF management, especially in complex cases.
颊窦瘘(BSF)的治疗方法需要仔细考虑感染状况、骨缺损大小和上皮化等因素。文献中描述了三种主要的治疗选择:前庭瓣、颊脂垫和腭瓣。本研究旨在报告一例经过五次手术干预后复发性BSF的临床病例,并回顾当前关于治疗方式的文献。一名42岁女性患者拔除左上第一磨牙后,进行了牙槽骨移植,进而发展为颊窦相通(BSC)。在45天内,她使用前庭瓣技术进行了五次手术干预,但未能防止上皮化,并导致了美学和功能并发症,如面部不对称和腮腺乳头移位。作为替代方案,采用了旋转劈开腭瓣。经过六个月的随访,观察到BSC完全闭合,供区无鼻窦病变或创面迹象,表明愈合良好且治疗成功。文献表明,虽然前庭瓣常用,但由于张力和血管化有限,它们在大的或复发性缺损中往往失败。颊脂垫提供良好的覆盖,但对于大面积区域可能不够。腭瓣因其来自腭大动脉的强大血供、较厚的组织和高成功率而突出,尤其是在先前治疗过的病例中。因此,它们强烈适用于难治性BSF病例。腭瓣是管理BSF的一种有效、可靠的替代方法,尤其是在复杂病例中。