Yarkaç Akif, Öncü Güldür Çiğdem, Bozkurt Seyran, Köse Ataman, Buyurgan Çağrı Safa, Erdoğan Semra, Kara Tuba
Department of Emergency Medicine, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
Department of Bioistatistics and Medical Informatics, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
PeerJ. 2025 Jul 25;13:e19754. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19754. eCollection 2025.
Acute appendicitis is a common cause of acute abdominal pain, typically treated surgically, although medical management is also an option. Laboratory investigations play a valuable role in diagnosis and predicting prognosis. We aimed to investigate and compare the effectiveness of indices such as the Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII), Systemic Inflammatory Response Index (SIRI), and Pan-Immune-Inflammatory Value (PIV), all derived from complete blood count, in diagnosing acute appendicitis and distinguishing between complicated and uncomplicated cases.
We retrospectively analyzed data from 334 patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis and 350 healthy individuals. The SII, SIRI, and PIV parameters were compared between the acute appendicitis group and the healthy group. The SII, SIRI, and PIV parameters were also compared between the complicated and uncomplicated groups.
All three parameters demonstrated good performance in predicting the diagnosis of appendicitis. An SII value above 1,008.43 ( < 0.0001, AUC = 0.707), a SIRI value above 2.60 ( < 0.0001, AUC = 0.743), and a PIV value above 904.85 ( < 0.0001, AUC = 0.726) were found to support the diagnosis of appendicitis. For predicting complicated appendicitis, thresholds were identified as SII values above 2501.13 ( = 0.0012, AUC = 0.634), SIRI values above 7.98 ( = 0.0005, AUC = 0.645), and PIV values above 1,869.66 ( = 0.0012, AUC = 0.635).
All three indices showed good predictive performance for diagnosing appendicitis and acceptable performance for predicting complicated cases. Among the indices, SIRI was slightly superior to the other two in both scenarios.
急性阑尾炎是急性腹痛的常见病因,通常采用手术治疗,不过药物治疗也是一种选择。实验室检查在诊断和预测预后方面发挥着重要作用。我们旨在研究和比较全身免疫炎症指数(SII)、全身炎症反应指数(SIRI)和全免疫炎症值(PIV)等指标在诊断急性阑尾炎以及区分复杂和非复杂病例方面的有效性,这些指标均来自血常规检查。
我们回顾性分析了334例诊断为急性阑尾炎的患者和350例健康个体的数据。比较了急性阑尾炎组和健康组之间的SII、SIRI和PIV参数。还比较了复杂组和非复杂组之间的SII、SIRI和PIV参数。
所有这三个参数在预测阑尾炎诊断方面均表现良好。发现SII值高于1008.43(<0.0001,AUC = 0.707)、SIRI值高于2.60(<0.0001,AUC = 0.743)以及PIV值高于904.85(<0.0001,AUC = 0.726)支持阑尾炎的诊断。对于预测复杂性阑尾炎,阈值确定为SII值高于2501.13(=0.0012,AUC = 0.634)、SIRI值高于7.98(=0.0005,AUC = 0.645)以及PIV值高于1869.66(=0.0012,AUC = 0.635)。
所有这三个指标在诊断阑尾炎方面均显示出良好的预测性能,在预测复杂病例方面表现尚可。在这些指标中,SIRI在两种情况下均略优于其他两个指标。