• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全身免疫炎症指数联合快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对脓毒症患者死亡率的预测价值

Systemic immune-inflammation index combined with quick sequential organ failure assessment score for predicting mortality in sepsis patients.

作者信息

Liu Changya, Wu Xinxin, Deng Rou, Xu Xiangru, Chen Caiyu, Wu Linguangjin, Zhang Wen, Yang Hongqiang, Fei Yuerong, Sun Yuting, Zhou Shuang, Fang Bangjiang

机构信息

Department of Emergency, LongHua Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200032, China.

Shanghai Skin Disease Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, 200443, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Aug 30;9(9):e19526. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19526. eCollection 2023 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19526
PMID:37809490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10558729/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prognostic ability of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) combine with quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) criteria in predicting the 28-day mortality of sepsis.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted, with the population comprised in whom sepsis was confirmed. Clinical and laboratory data recorded were analyzed. The score of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), SII, qSOFA were calculated. Multivariable regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Kaplan-Meier method were used to identify and compared the predictors of prognosis among SOFA, qSOFA, and the combination of SII with qSOFA.

RESULTS

A total of 349 patients admitted from December 2020 and December 2022 were included in the cohort. 95 (27.2%) of whom had died by day 28. The SII, SOFA, and qSOFA scores were significant higher in the non-survivors than that of survivors (P < 0.05), and identified as independent predictors of sepsis mortality. The addition of SII to qSOFA shown an area under receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) of 0.840 (95% CI: 0.787-0.884), manifested an effective ability in predicting poor outcome than other scoring systems. The optimum cutoff for SII (>1.7668) and qSOFA (>1) represented a high risk level in 28-day mortality of sepsis, were performed and identified in Kaplan-Meier survival curves (log-rank test, HR: 6.942, 95% CI: 3.976-12.121; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The SII in addition to qSOFA provided an effective prognostic tool for predicting mortality in sepsis.

摘要

目的

评估全身免疫炎症指数(SII)联合快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)标准预测脓毒症28天死亡率的预后能力。

方法

进行一项回顾性队列研究,纳入确诊为脓毒症的人群。对记录的临床和实验室数据进行分析。计算序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、SII、qSOFA评分。采用多变量回归、受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和Kaplan-Meier方法来识别和比较SOFA、qSOFA以及SII与qSOFA联合使用时的预后预测因素。

结果

该队列共纳入2020年12月至2022年12月收治的349例患者。其中95例(27.2%)在第28天死亡。非幸存者的SII、SOFA和qSOFA评分显著高于幸存者(P<0.05),并被确定为脓毒症死亡率的独立预测因素。将SII加入qSOFA后,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.840(95%CI:0.787 - 0.884),表明其预测不良结局的能力优于其他评分系统。SII(>1.7668)和qSOFA(>1)的最佳截断值在Kaplan-Meier生存曲线中显示出脓毒症28天死亡率的高风险水平(对数秩检验,HR:6.942,95%CI:3.976 - 12.121;P<0.0001)。

结论

除qSOFA外,SII为预测脓毒症死亡率提供了一种有效的预后工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/6909f30772b7/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/1c518deb3903/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/59b68fd03f61/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/87cbe8c77223/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/397f0dd55b57/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/753dcf6e579a/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/aeb7769799bc/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/56aa467fbcda/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/aed8ae4d7daf/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/6909f30772b7/gr9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/1c518deb3903/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/59b68fd03f61/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/87cbe8c77223/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/397f0dd55b57/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/753dcf6e579a/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/aeb7769799bc/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/56aa467fbcda/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/aed8ae4d7daf/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5804/10558729/6909f30772b7/gr9.jpg

相似文献

1
Systemic immune-inflammation index combined with quick sequential organ failure assessment score for predicting mortality in sepsis patients.全身免疫炎症指数联合快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对脓毒症患者死亡率的预测价值
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 30;9(9):e19526. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19526. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
3
Validation of prognostic accuracy of the SOFA score, SIRS criteria, and qSOFA score for in-hospital mortality among cardiac-, thoracic-, and vascular-surgery patients admitted to a cardiothoracic intensive care unit.入住心胸重症监护病房的心脏、胸科和血管手术患者中,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准及快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分对院内死亡率预后准确性的验证。
J Card Surg. 2020 Jan;35(1):118-127. doi: 10.1111/jocs.14331. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
The systemic immune-inflammation index in predicting sepsis mortality.全身免疫炎症指数在预测脓毒症死亡率中的作用
Postgrad Med. 2023 May;135(4):345-351. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2022.2140535. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
5
Prognostic accuracy of the serum lactate level, the SOFA score and the qSOFA score for mortality among adults with Sepsis.血清乳酸水平、SOFA 评分和 qSOFA 评分对成人脓毒症死亡率的预后准确性。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Apr 30;27(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0609-3.
6
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).脓毒症临床标准评估:针对《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义》(Sepsis-3)。
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.
7
[Evaluation value of the quick sequential organ failure assessment score on prognosis of intensive care unit adult patients with infection: a 17-year observation study from the real world].快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对重症监护病房成年感染患者预后的评估价值:一项基于现实世界的17年观察性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jun;30(6):544-548. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.008.
8
Accuracy of quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria for predicting mortality in hospitalized patients with suspected infection: a meta-analysis of observational studies.快速序贯器官衰竭评估 (qSOFA) 评分和全身性炎症反应综合征 (SIRS) 标准对疑似感染住院患者死亡率预测的准确性:观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Nov;24(11):1123-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.032. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
9
[Predictive value of four different scoring systems for septic patient's outcome: a retrospective analysis with 311 patients].[四种不同评分系统对脓毒症患者预后的预测价值:311例患者的回顾性分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):133-138. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.008.
10
Comparison of SOFA Score, SIRS, qSOFA, and qSOFA + L Criteria in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Sepsis.序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)及qSOFA+L标准在脓毒症诊断和预后中的比较
Eurasian J Med. 2021 Feb;53(1):40-47. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2021.20081.

引用本文的文献

1
The value of inflammatory indices in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and prediction of complicated appendicitis: a retrospective study.炎症指标在急性阑尾炎诊断及复杂性阑尾炎预测中的价值:一项回顾性研究
PeerJ. 2025 Jul 25;13:e19754. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19754. eCollection 2025.
2
Systemic immune-inflammatory complex index as a novel predictor of sepsis prognosis: a retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV.全身免疫炎症复合指数作为脓毒症预后的新型预测指标:一项使用MIMIC-IV的回顾性队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 30;12:1608619. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1608619. eCollection 2025.
3
Prognostic value of NPR and CLR-based nomogram modeling in elderly patients with Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection.

本文引用的文献

1
Combining C-reactive protein and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) to improve prognostic accuracy for sepsis and mortality in adult inpatients: A systematic review.联合C反应蛋白与快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)以提高成年住院患者脓毒症及死亡率的预后预测准确性:一项系统综述
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 20;6(4):e1229. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1229. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Evaluation of qSOFA combined with inflammatory mediators for diagnosing sepsis and predicting mortality among emergency department.评价 qSOFA 联合炎症介质对急诊科脓毒症的诊断和死亡率预测的价值。
Clin Chim Acta. 2023 Apr 1;544:117352. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117352. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
3
基于中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NPR)和校正淋巴细胞比值(CLR)的列线图模型在老年鲍曼不动杆菌血流感染患者中的预后价值
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Apr 9;25(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05884-y.
4
Association between hematological inflammatory markers and latent TB infection: insights from NHANES 2011-2012 and transcriptomic data.血液学炎症标志物与潜伏性结核感染之间的关联:来自2011 - 2012年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)及转录组数据的见解
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Mar 19;15:1556048. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1556048. eCollection 2025.
5
The Role of qSOFA, Derived Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, MEWS, and PIRO Scores in Predicting the Severity of Odontogenic Infections in Young and Adult Patients.qSOFA、衍生中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、MEWS和PIRO评分在预测年轻及成年患者牙源性感染严重程度中的作用
Biomedicines. 2025 Feb 20;13(3):532. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13030532.
6
Systemic immune-inflammation index and the short-term mortality of patients with sepsis: A meta-analysis.全身免疫炎症指数与脓毒症患者的短期死亡率:一项荟萃分析。
Biomol Biomed. 2025 Mar 7;25(4):798-809. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.11494.
7
Prognostic value of the systemic immune-inflammation index in critically ill elderly patients with hip fracture: evidence from MIMIC (2008-2019).全身免疫炎症指数在老年髋部骨折重症患者中的预后价值:来自MIMIC(2008 - 2019)的证据
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 May 30;11:1408371. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408371. eCollection 2024.
The prognostic utility of prehospital qSOFA in addition to emergency department qSOFA for sepsis in patients with suspected infection: A retrospective cohort study.
院前 qSOFA 对疑似感染性脓毒症患者除急诊 qSOFA 以外的预后预测价值:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0282148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282148. eCollection 2023.
4
The Predictive Value of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index and Symptom Severity Score for Sepsis and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome in Odontogenic Infections.全身免疫炎症指数和症状严重程度评分对牙源性感染中脓毒症和全身炎症反应综合征的预测价值
J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 7;12(12):2026. doi: 10.3390/jpm12122026.
5
The systemic immune-inflammation index in predicting sepsis mortality.全身免疫炎症指数在预测脓毒症死亡率中的作用
Postgrad Med. 2023 May;135(4):345-351. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2022.2140535. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
6
Systemic immune-inflammation index as a potential biomarker of cardiovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全身免疫炎症指数作为心血管疾病的潜在生物标志物:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 8;9:933913. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.933913. eCollection 2022.
7
SOFA Score in relation to Sepsis: Clinical Implications in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognostic Assessment.SOFA 评分与脓毒症:在诊断、治疗和预后评估中的临床意义。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Aug 10;2022:7870434. doi: 10.1155/2022/7870434. eCollection 2022.
8
Evaluation of qSOFA score, and conjugated bilirubin and creatinine levels for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis.评估序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分、结合胆红素和肌酐水平对脓毒症患者28天死亡率的预测价值。
Exp Ther Med. 2022 May 16;24(1):447. doi: 10.3892/etm.2022.11374. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Prognostic Value of Syndecan-1 in the Prediction of Sepsis-Related Complications and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis.硫酸乙酰肝素蛋白聚糖-1 预测脓毒症相关并发症和死亡率的预后价值:一项荟萃分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Apr 11;10:870065. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.870065. eCollection 2022.
10
SAPS III is superior to SOFA for predicting 28-day mortality in sepsis patients based on Sepsis 3.0 criteria.基于 Sepsis 3.0 标准,SAPS III 比 SOFA 更能预测脓毒症患者 28 天死亡率。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Jan;114:135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.015. Epub 2021 Nov 11.