Benamar Soraya, Lukas Cédric, Daien Claire, Gaujoux-Viala Cécile, Gossec Laure, Rat Anne-Christine, Combe Bernard, Morel Jacques
Département de Rhumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Montpellier and University of Montpellier, PhyMedExp, INSERM, CNRS UMR, Montpellier, France.
Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes, Nîmes, France, and Desbrest Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Montpellier, INSERM, Montpellier, France.
ACR Open Rheumatol. 2025 Aug;7(8):e70066. doi: 10.1002/acr2.70066.
The objective of this study was to assess whether polypharmacy (PP) was associated with treatment response and serious adverse events (SAEs) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Additionally, we aimed to investigate whether PP could serve as a surrogate marker for comorbidities.
We used data from the French cohort ESPOIR, a prospective study of early RA. PP was defined as a categorical variable stratified into two or three categories according to median of distribution in the cohort. A logistic regression model was used. We assessed the occurrence of SAEs (severe infections, hospitalizations, deaths) throughout a 10-year follow-up period.
The proportion of patients who achieved DAS 28 remission (REM) one year after the initiation of the first disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) was 32.1% in the PP group versus 67.9% in the non-PP group (P = 0.07) from 497 patients included. At five years, the proportion with REM was 45.0% in the PP group versus 56.3% in the non-PP group (P = 0.03). Patients taking two or more medications (excluding RA therapy) had a 40% lower likelihood of achieving REM at five years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.60 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.94], P = 0.03). At 10 years, patients receiving multiple medications had a 43% lower probability of achieving REM (adjusted OR 0.57 [95% CI 0.34-0.94], P = 0.02). The incidence of SAEs was 61 per 1,000 person-years. Among patients who developed SAEs, 86.4% were in the PP group and 49.8% were in the non-PP group (P = 0.03).
PP is associated with a poorer treatment response and increased risk of SAEs. PP may serve as a good surrogate marker of comorbidities in epidemiologic studies.
本研究的目的是评估在早期类风湿关节炎(RA)中,联合用药(PP)是否与治疗反应及严重不良事件(SAEs)相关。此外,我们旨在研究PP是否可作为合并症的替代标志物。
我们使用了来自法国ESPOIR队列的数据,这是一项针对早期RA的前瞻性研究。PP被定义为一个分类变量,根据队列中的分布中位数分为两类或三类。使用逻辑回归模型。我们在10年的随访期内评估了SAEs(严重感染、住院、死亡)的发生情况。
在纳入的497例患者中,PP组在启动第一种改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARD)一年后达到DAS 28缓解(REM)的患者比例为32.1%,而非PP组为67.9%(P = 0.07)。在五年时,PP组达到REM的比例为45.0%,非PP组为56.3%(P = 0.03)。服用两种或更多药物(不包括RA治疗)的患者在五年时达到REM的可能性降低40%(调整后的优势比[OR]为0.60 [95%置信区间(CI)0.38 - 0.94],P = 0.03)。在10年时,接受多种药物治疗的患者达到REM的概率降低43%(调整后的OR为0.57 [95% CI 0.34 - 0.94],P = 0.02)。SAEs的发生率为每1000人年61例。在发生SAEs的患者中,86.4%在PP组,49.8%在非PP组(P = 0.03)。
PP与较差的治疗反应及SAEs风险增加相关。在流行病学研究中,PP可能是合并症的良好替代标志物。