• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种决策标准中逐次试验波动的贝叶斯分层模型。

A Bayesian hierarchical model of trial-to-trial fluctuations in decision criterion.

作者信息

Vloeberghs Robin, Urai Anne E, Desender Kobe, Linderman Scott W

机构信息

Brain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Cognitive Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Jul 29;21(7):e1013291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013291. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013291
PMID:40729408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12367131/
Abstract

Classical decision models assume that the parameters giving rise to choice behavior are stable, yet emerging research suggests these parameters may fluctuate over time. Such fluctuations, observed in neural activity and behavioral strategies, have significant implications for understanding decision-making processes. However, empirical studies on fluctuating human decision-making strategies have been limited due to the extensive data requirements for estimating these fluctuations. Here, we introduce hMFC (Hierarchical Model for Fluctuations in Criterion), a Bayesian framework designed to estimate slow fluctuations in the decision criterion from limited data. We first showcase the importance of considering fluctuations in decision criterion: incorrectly assuming a stable criterion gives rise to apparent history effects and underestimates perceptual sensitivity. We then present a hierarchical estimation procedure capable of reliably recovering the underlying state of the fluctuating decision criterion with as few as 500 trials per participant, offering a robust tool for researchers with typical human datasets. Critically, hMFC does not only accurately recover the state of the underlying decision criterion, it also effectively deals with the confounds caused by criterion fluctuations. Lastly, we provide code and a comprehensive demo to enable widespread application of hMFC in decision-making research.

摘要

经典决策模型假设,产生选择行为的参数是稳定的,但新兴研究表明,这些参数可能会随时间波动。在神经活动和行为策略中观察到的这种波动,对于理解决策过程具有重要意义。然而,由于估计这些波动需要大量数据,关于人类决策策略波动的实证研究一直有限。在此,我们引入了hMFC(标准波动分层模型),这是一个贝叶斯框架,旨在从有限的数据中估计决策标准的缓慢波动。我们首先展示了考虑决策标准波动的重要性:错误地假设标准稳定会产生明显的历史效应,并低估感知敏感性。然后,我们提出了一种分层估计程序,能够以每位参与者少至500次试验可靠地恢复波动决策标准的潜在状态,为拥有典型人类数据集的研究人员提供了一个强大的工具。至关重要的是,hMFC不仅能准确恢复潜在决策标准的状态,还能有效处理由标准波动引起的混淆因素。最后,我们提供了代码和全面的演示,以实现hMFC在决策研究中的广泛应用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/4ed75f6770e0/pcbi.1013291.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/3b1755c6ab7e/pcbi.1013291.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/db855c775fb9/pcbi.1013291.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/580cd838010f/pcbi.1013291.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/47fc8abd6c74/pcbi.1013291.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/d6d056194ebd/pcbi.1013291.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/3abd8ff4decd/pcbi.1013291.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/4ed75f6770e0/pcbi.1013291.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/3b1755c6ab7e/pcbi.1013291.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/db855c775fb9/pcbi.1013291.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/580cd838010f/pcbi.1013291.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/47fc8abd6c74/pcbi.1013291.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/d6d056194ebd/pcbi.1013291.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/3abd8ff4decd/pcbi.1013291.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8c3a/12367131/4ed75f6770e0/pcbi.1013291.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
A Bayesian hierarchical model of trial-to-trial fluctuations in decision criterion.一种决策标准中逐次试验波动的贝叶斯分层模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Jul 29;21(7):e1013291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013291. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
A Bayesian Hierarchical Model of Trial-To-Trial Fluctuations in Decision Criterion.决策标准中逐次试验波动的贝叶斯层次模型
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 2:2024.07.30.605869. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.30.605869.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Leveraging machine learning to uncover the hidden links between trusting behavior and biological markers.利用机器学习揭示信任行为与生物标志物之间的潜在联系。
Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2025 Dec;27(1):201-215. doi: 10.1080/19585969.2025.2513697. Epub 2025 Jun 20.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Flexible decision-making is related to strategy learning, vicarious trial and error, and medial prefrontal rhythms during spatial set-shifting.灵活决策与策略学习、替代试错以及空间定势转换期间的内侧前额叶节律有关。
Learn Mem. 2024 Jul 22;31(7). doi: 10.1101/lm.053911.123. Print 2024 Jul.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome全身炎症反应综合征
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Structure uncovered: understanding temporal variability in perceptual decision-making.结构揭示:理解知觉决策中的时间变异性
Trends Cogn Sci. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2025.06.003.
2
Disentangling sources of variability in decision-making.理清决策中变异性的来源。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2025 May;26(5):247-262. doi: 10.1038/s41583-025-00916-3. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
3
An efficient Bayesian observer model of attractive and repulsive temporal context effects when perceiving multistable dot lattices.当感知多稳定点格时,吸引人的和排斥的时间上下文效应的有效贝叶斯观察器模型。
J Vis. 2024 Apr 1;24(4):18. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.4.18.
4
Dynamic computational phenotyping of human cognition.人类认知的动态计算表型分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 May;8(5):917-931. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01814-x. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
5
Predictions and rewards affect decision-making but not subjective experience.预测和奖励会影响决策,但不会影响主观体验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 31;120(44):e2220749120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220749120. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
6
Probabilistic integration of preceding responses explains response bias in perceptual decision making.先前反应的概率整合解释了知觉决策中的反应偏差。
iScience. 2023 Jun 14;26(7):107123. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107123. eCollection 2023 Jul 21.
7
Why is everyone talking about brain state?为什么大家都在谈论大脑状态?
Trends Neurosci. 2023 Jul;46(7):508-524. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2023.04.001. Epub 2023 May 8.
8
It's about time: Linking dynamical systems with human neuroimaging to understand the brain.是时候了:将动力系统与人类神经成像联系起来以理解大脑。
Netw Neurosci. 2022 Oct 1;6(4):960-979. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00230. eCollection 2022.
9
Persistent activity in human parietal cortex mediates perceptual choice repetition bias.人类顶叶皮层的持续活动介导了知觉选择重复偏向。
Nat Commun. 2022 Oct 12;13(1):6015. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33237-5.
10
Same stimulus, same temporal context, different percept? Individual differences in hysteresis and adaptation when perceiving multistable dot lattices.相同刺激,相同时间背景,不同感知?感知多稳态点阵时滞后和适应的个体差异。
Iperception. 2022 Jul 6;13(4):20416695221109300. doi: 10.1177/20416695221109300. eCollection 2022 Jul.