Simar Lexi, Rosa-Molinar Eduardo
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Bioengineering Graduate Program, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
Washington University Center for Cellular Imaging and Departments of Cell Biology & Physiology and Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Curr Protoc. 2025 Jul;5(7):e70177. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.70177.
Optical microscopy encompasses a wide array of instruments and applications, each designed with the goal of obtaining the best possible image. However, achieving that goal depends on multiple factors, including, but not limited to, choice of microscope sample and calibration standards. Alignment or calibration standards are mandatory to obtain the best image possible. Currently, standards on the market are limited by such factors as fluorescence, sample volume and sample-to-sample interaction, and aberrations. Reported here is the testing of pollen as an imaging phantom, a designed material or device that mimics human tissue for the purpose of reliable and accurate calibration of an imaging system, and the benchmarking of a recently built multimodal adaptive optics multiphoton fluorescence microscope system. The developed imaging phantom was used to compare intensity values to those of an industry standard (TetraSpeck). Comparisons were made using deconvolutions of the captured images and their resultant point-spread functions in addition to measurements taken of surface characteristics. All comparisons between imaging media, imaging conditions per photomultiplier tube (PMT), and the interaction of media and imaging conditions showed significant p-values. Results showed that medium selection had a substantial impact on intensity output and was thus influenced by the choice of PMT (signal output from a sample). Results showed the sample itself impacted the intensity readings, as indicated by the comparison of two-dimensional (TetraSpeck) and three-dimensional (pollen grains) samples. © 2025 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Sample preparation for multimodal adaptive optics multiphoton fluorescence microscope (mAO-MPFM) analysis Support Protocol: Pollen collection Basic Protocol 2: Observing autofluorescence and surface structures of pollen grains using mAO-MPFM Basic Protocol 3: Sample preparation for cold field emission scanning electron microscope (cFE-SEM) imaging Basic Protocol 4: Observing surface characteristics of pollen grains using cFE-SEM Basic Protocol 5: Pollen grain structure manual and mask measurement for fluorescent and SEM images with comparisons Basic Protocol 6: Intensity analysis of fluorescence images with Image-Pro and Prism.
光学显微镜涵盖了各种各样的仪器和应用,每一种都是为获得尽可能最佳的图像这一目标而设计的。然而,要实现这一目标取决于多个因素,包括但不限于显微镜样本的选择和校准标准。校准标准对于获得尽可能最佳的图像是必不可少的。目前,市场上的标准受到诸如荧光、样本体积、样本间相互作用以及像差等因素的限制。本文报道了对花粉作为成像模型的测试,成像模型是一种为成像系统进行可靠且准确的校准而设计的、模拟人体组织的材料或装置,以及对最近构建的多模态自适应光学多光子荧光显微镜系统的基准测试。所开发的成像模型用于将强度值与行业标准(四色荧光微球)的强度值进行比较。除了对表面特征进行测量外,还使用捕获图像的去卷积及其所得的点扩散函数进行了比较。成像介质之间、每个光电倍增管(PMT)的成像条件以及介质与成像条件之间的相互作用的所有比较均显示出显著的p值。结果表明,介质选择对强度输出有重大影响,因此受到PMT(样本的信号输出)选择的影响。结果表明,样本本身会影响强度读数,二维(四色荧光微球)和三维(花粉粒)样本的比较表明了这一点。© 2025威利期刊有限责任公司。基本方案1:多模态自适应光学多光子荧光显微镜(mAO - MPFM)分析的样本制备支持方案:花粉采集基本方案2:使用mAO - MPFM观察花粉粒的自发荧光和表面结构基本方案3:冷场发射扫描电子显微镜(cFE - SEM)成像的样本制备基本方案4:使用cFE - SEM观察花粉粒的表面特征基本方案5:对荧光和扫描电子显微镜图像进行花粉粒结构手动测量和掩膜测量并进行比较基本方案6:使用Image - Pro和Prism对荧光图像进行强度分析