Özbay Ahmet, Kocacık Şahin Özge Sena
Ministry of National Education, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Psychol Rep. 2025 Jul 29:332941251363909. doi: 10.1177/00332941251363909.
This study aimed to investigate the relationships between adult attachment patterns, emotion dysregulation, and pathological narcissism-both fragile and grandiose dimensions. Previous research has indicated that attachment styles and emotion regulation difficulties play significant roles in narcissism development; however, the combined effects of these variables on both dimensions of narcissism remain insufficiently explored. The sample consisted of 114 individuals aged at least 18 years who were selected using convenience sampling from Sakarya University's student population. The gender distribution was balanced, with 57 (50%) female and 57 (50%) male participants. The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, Pathological Narcissism Inventory, Relationship Scales Questionnaire, and a Demographic Information Form were administered to participants. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS statistical software. Between-group differences were examined using test analysis, relationships between variables were investigated using Pearson correlation analysis, and predictive capacity was determined using hierarchical regression analysis. The results revealed a significant negative relationship between fragile narcissism and secure attachment, while positive relationships were found between fragile narcissism and preoccupied attachment, dismissive attachment, and emotion dysregulation difficulties. No significant relationships were found between grandiose narcissism and attachment styles. When all independent variables were included in the regression analysis, they collectively explained 36% of the variance in fragile narcissism, with emotion dysregulation (β = .395) and preoccupied attachment (β = .287) emerging as the strongest predictors. These findings highlight the importance of addressing emotion regulation skills and insecure attachment patterns in therapeutic interventions for individuals with fragile narcissistic traits, which may contribute to more effective clinical approaches and psychological support strategies.
本研究旨在探讨成人依恋模式、情绪调节障碍与病理性自恋(包括脆弱型和夸大型两个维度)之间的关系。先前的研究表明,依恋风格和情绪调节困难在自恋发展中起着重要作用;然而,这些变量对自恋两个维度的综合影响仍未得到充分探索。样本由114名年龄至少18岁的个体组成,他们是从萨卡里亚大学的学生群体中通过便利抽样选取的。性别分布均衡,有57名(50%)女性和57名(50%)男性参与者。对参与者施测了情绪调节困难量表、病理性自恋量表、关系量表问卷和一份人口统计学信息表。使用SPSS统计软件进行数据分析。组间差异采用t检验分析,变量之间的关系采用Pearson相关分析,预测能力采用分层回归分析确定。结果显示,脆弱型自恋与安全型依恋之间存在显著负相关,而脆弱型自恋与痴迷型依恋、疏离型依恋和情绪调节障碍困难之间存在正相关。夸大型自恋与依恋风格之间未发现显著关系。当所有自变量纳入回归分析时,它们共同解释了脆弱型自恋中36%的变异,其中情绪调节障碍(β = 0.395)和痴迷型依恋(β = 0.287)是最强的预测因素。这些发现凸显了在针对具有脆弱自恋特质个体的治疗干预中,解决情绪调节技能和不安全依恋模式的重要性,这可能有助于形成更有效的临床方法和心理支持策略。