Suppr超能文献

Transcranial magnetic vs intracranial electric stimulation: a direct comparison of their effects via scalp EEG recordings.

作者信息

Comolatti Renzo, Hassan Gabriel, Mikulan Ezequiel, Russo Simone, Colombo Michele A, Litterio Elisabetta, Furregoni Giulia, D'Ambrosio Sasha, Fecchio Matteo, Parmigiani Sara, Sartori Ivana, Casarotto Silvia, Pigorini Andrea, Massimini Marcello

机构信息

Center for Sleep and Consciousness, Department of Psychiatry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; Department of Philosophy "Piero Martinetti", Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2025 Sep-Oct;18(5):1444-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2025.07.016. Epub 2025 Jul 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Intracranial Electrical Stimulation (IES) are widely used to probe cortical excitability and connectivity, but their electrophysiological effects have never been compared.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to fill this gap by using high-density scalp electroencephalogram (hd-EEG) as a common read-out to compare human brain responses to TMS and IES.

METHODS

The dataset includes TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) acquired from healthy subjects (n = 22) and IES-evoked potentials (IEPs) recorded from drug-resistant epileptic patients (n = 31) during wakefulness. In a subset of subjects TEPs (n = 12) and IEPs (n = 13) were also recorded during NREM sleep. Amplitude, spectral, and spatiotemporal features of TMS and IES responses, as well as their estimated electrical fields, were compared.

RESULTS

We observed marked differences between TMS and IES responses. During wakefulness, IEPs are considerably larger, slower and associated with a suppression of cortical activity, whereas TEPs are characterized by multiple waves of recurrent activation. These differences are attenuated in NREM, during which both TMS and IES elicit large EEG responses associated with a prominent suppression of cortical activity. At the global level, the spatiotemporal complexity of the responses to both TMS and IES decreases consistently following the transition from wakefulness to NREM sleep.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limitations due to different subject populations (healthy vs pathological), our findings provide a first reference to parallel non-invasive and invasive brain stimulation and to interpret their differential effects. They also offer important insight on how cortical responsiveness is shaped by inhibition and adaptation mechanisms depending on input parameters and brain states.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验