Baykoca Buse, Yılmaz Salim
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Graduate School, Istanbul Okan University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Department of Health Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Istanbul, 34752, Türkiye.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 29;15(1):27597. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13156-3.
Food loss and waste (FLW) threaten progress toward Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 12.3, yet their distribution by development stage remains under-quantified. We created a time-weighted K-means typology for 105 countries (2000-2022) using Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, GDP growth, and per-capita health expenditure-indicators chosen to capture economic capacity, growth momentum, and institutional investment. The scheme classified nations as developed (n = 13), developing (n = 92), or hybrid, with > 98% membership stability across weighting parameters. Linking this typology with FAO's FLW data, we modelled food loss percentages (FLP) across ten commodity groups and eight supply-chain stages using multilevel mixed-effects regression. Developed countries lost the most food at consumption (22.5%), dwarfing developing (6.8%) and hybrid cases (9.0-14.2%), whereas developing nations suffered greater upstream losses at harvest/on-farm (3.7%). FLP in developing economies was significantly lower for grains (β = - 8.02, p = 0.007), oilseeds (β = - 19.29, p = 0.016) and pulses (β = - 5.43, p = 0.021). From 2000 to 2022, oilseed and sugar losses rose (β = 0.26, p < 0.001), while roots/tubers and dairy/eggs declined (β = - 0.31, - 0.89; p < 0.01). Stage analyses revealed pronounced development gaps at consumption (β = - 16.06, p < 0.001) and processing (β = - 5.58, p = 0.014), alongside a rising trend in marketing/retail losses (β = 0.25, p = 0.005). Country-level random effects explained up to 90% of variance, underscoring the dominance of local conditions. The evidence supports consumer-behaviour interventions in high-income settings, upstream infrastructure investment in developing regions, and dual-track strategies in hybrids. Our typology provides a scalable, policy-ready lens for designing targeted FLW actions aligned with SDG 12.3.
粮食损失和浪费(FLW)威胁着可持续发展目标(SDG)12.3的进展,但其在不同发展阶段的分布情况仍未得到充分量化。我们使用人均国内生产总值(GDP)、GDP增长和人均卫生支出(这些指标旨在反映经济能力、增长势头和机构投资),为105个国家(2000 - 2022年)创建了一种时间加权K均值分类法。该方案将国家分为发达国家(n = 13)、发展中国家(n = 92)或混合型国家,在不同加权参数下,成员稳定性超过98%。将这种分类法与粮农组织的FLW数据相结合,我们使用多级混合效应回归对十个商品组和八个供应链阶段的粮食损失百分比(FLP)进行了建模。发达国家在消费环节损失的粮食最多(22.5%),远超发展中国家(6.8%)和混合型国家(9.0 - 14.2%),而发展中国家在收获/农场环节的上游损失更大(3.7%)。发展中经济体中,谷物(β = - 8.02,p = 0.007)、油籽(β = - 19.29,p = 0.016)和豆类(β = - 5.43,p = 0.021)的FLP显著较低。从2000年到2022年,油籽和糖的损失有所增加(β = 0.26,p < 0.001),而块根/块茎以及乳制品/蛋类的损失则有所下降(β = - 0.31, - 0.89;p < 0.01)。阶段分析显示,在消费(β = - 16.06,p < 0.001)和加工(β = - 5.58,p = 0.014)环节存在明显的发展差距,同时营销/零售损失呈上升趋势(β = 0.25,p = 0.005)。国家层面的随机效应解释了高达90%的方差,突出了当地条件的主导作用。证据支持在高收入环境中采取消费者行为干预措施,在发展中地区进行上游基础设施投资,以及在混合型国家采取双轨战略。我们的分类法为设计与SDG 12.3一致的针对性FLW行动提供了一个可扩展的、可供政策参考的视角。