Jomantas Tadas, Kemzūraitė Aurelija, Steponavičius Dainius, Andriušis Albinas, Dorelis Mindaugas, Balčiūnas Jonas
Department of Agricultural Engineering and Safety, Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy, Studentų St. 15 A, Kaunas district, Akademija, LT-53362, Lithuania.
Department of Agroecosystems and Soil Sciences, Vytautas Magnus University Agriculture Academy, Studentų St. 11, Kaunas district, Akademija, LT-53361, Lithuania.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 30;15(1):27741. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13493-3.
Pesticide spraying is one of the most significant processes in agricultural production and one of the most complicated, risky agricultural operations. Side effects of pesticides can cause acute poisoning and serious chronic diseases in humans. Robotic spraying in agriculture is one solution to avoid human intervention. However, there has been little research on the distribution of droplets and unwanted spray drift when spraying with ground spraying robots equipped with jet spraying systems. This study analyses the downwind spray drift of three drift reduction agents (DRAs) depending on the lateral wind velocity using a ground spraying robot equipped with a jet spraying system in the field under conditionally controlled conditions. The three DRAs investigated were: DRA1 (100% anionic polymer dispersion), DRA2 (calcium dodecylbenzene sulfonate 50%, butanol 18%), and DRA3 (C10-13-alkyl derivatives, calcium salt 37%, butanol 15%). DRA solutions at a concentration of 0.1% (water as control) were sprayed with a jet spraying system and analyzed at four different droplet diameter levels ranging from VMD=60 μm to 120 μm, with a change every 20 μm. The study showed that the atomization level of droplets had a significant effect on the impact of spray drift: the smaller the droplets are sprayed (VMD=60-80 μm), the lower the effectiveness of DRA (spray drift can be reduced by about 2.5-fold) while spraying larger droplets (VMD=100-120 μm) with DRA reduces drift by about 3.5-fold (at the lateral wind of 4 m s). The use of DRAs also significantly impacted the reduction of spray drift. All DRA solutions were significantly more effective at low lateral winds (2-4 m s). Moreover, the difference between the effectiveness of DRA solutions decreases with increasing lateral wind velocity from 2 to 10 m s. In summary, the following management measures can be used to control droplet drift using a robotic jet spraying system, in order of importance: lateral wind velocity, selection of the level of droplet atomization, and the use of DRAs. This can help to find the optimal solution to ensure optimal coverage of plants with plant protection products and to minimize losses and negative environmental impacts.
农药喷洒是农业生产中最重要的环节之一,也是最复杂、风险最高的农事操作之一。农药的副作用会导致人类急性中毒和严重的慢性疾病。农业中的机器人喷洒是避免人工干预的一种解决方案。然而,对于配备喷射式喷洒系统的地面喷洒机器人进行喷洒时液滴的分布和不必要的喷雾漂移,相关研究较少。本研究在有条件控制的田间条件下,使用配备喷射式喷洒系统的地面喷洒机器人,根据侧向风速分析了三种防漂移剂(DRA)的顺风喷雾漂移情况。所研究的三种DRA分别是:DRA1(100%阴离子聚合物分散体)、DRA2(50%十二烷基苯磺酸钙、18%丁醇)和DRA3(C10 - 13烷基衍生物、37%钙盐、15%丁醇)。用喷射式喷洒系统喷洒浓度为0.1%的DRA溶液(以水作为对照),并在四个不同的液滴直径水平(体积中径VMD从60μm到120μm,每隔20μm变化一次)下进行分析。研究表明,液滴的雾化水平对喷雾漂移的影响显著:喷洒的液滴越小(VMD = 60 - 80μm),DRA的效果越低(喷雾漂移可降低约2.5倍),而使用DRA喷洒较大液滴(VMD = 100 - 120μm)时,漂移减少约3.5倍(在侧向风速为4 m/s时)。使用DRA对减少喷雾漂移也有显著影响。所有DRA溶液在低侧向风速(2 - 4 m/s)时效果显著更好。此外,随着侧向风速从2 m/s增加到10 m/s,DRA溶液效果之间的差异减小。总之,为了控制使用机器人喷射式喷洒系统时的液滴漂移,可按重要性顺序采取以下管理措施:侧向风速、液滴雾化水平的选择以及DRA的使用。这有助于找到最佳解决方案,以确保植物保护产品对植物的最佳覆盖,并将损失和负面环境影响降至最低。