Sacarin Geanina, Abu-Awwad Ahmed, Razvan Nitu, Craina Marius, Hogea Bogdan, Sorop Bogdan, Abu-Awwad Simona-Alina, Diaconu Mircea, Pilut Nicolae Ciprian, Suba Madalina-Ianca
Doctoral School, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Department XV-Discipline of Orthopedics-Traumatology, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 25;61(7):1140. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071140.
: Genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) is a prevalent and distressing condition in postmenopausal women, often leading to sexual dysfunction characterized by vaginal dryness, pain, and reduced libido. While local estrogen therapy remains the standard treatment, due to safety concerns and contraindications, there is growing interest in the exploration of alternative interventions. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of intravaginal platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy versus local hormonal treatment in improving sexual function and vaginal health in postmenopausal women. : A prospective, controlled clinical trial was conducted between January 2023 and December 2024 across three private gynecology clinics in Timișoara, Romania. Ninety postmenopausal women aged between 50 and 65 years with FSFI scores ≤ 23 were randomized into two groups: one receiving three monthly sessions of autologous PRP and the other undergoing 12 weeks of vaginal estriol therapy. Outcomes were assessed using validated tools-the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), the Vaginal Health Index (VHI), the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), and patient satisfaction scores-at baseline, week 6, and week 12. : Both of the treatment groups demonstrated significant improvements in FSFI and VHI scores at 12 weeks, with the PRP group showing a slightly higher, though not statistically significant, mean increase in the total FSFI (+10.1 vs. +9.3 points). Clinical gains were also observed in lubrication, elasticity, and dyspareunia. Patient satisfaction was high in both groups (93.3% PRP vs. 88.9% hormonal), and there were no reports of serious adverse events during the study period. The PRP group exhibited fewer side effects, without systemic symptoms, supporting its favorable safety profile. : PRP therapy is a well-tolerated, hormone-free treatment that offers clinically meaningful improvements in sexual function and vaginal health, comparable to estrogen therapy. It may be particularly beneficial for women with contraindications to hormones or in advanced postmenopause. Further long-term studies are needed to confirm these findings and optimize treatment protocols.
更年期泌尿生殖综合征(GSM)是绝经后女性中一种普遍且令人苦恼的病症,常导致以阴道干燥、疼痛和性欲减退为特征的性功能障碍。虽然局部雌激素治疗仍是标准治疗方法,但出于安全考虑和禁忌症,人们对探索替代干预措施的兴趣日益浓厚。本研究旨在比较阴道内富血小板血浆(PRP)疗法与局部激素治疗在改善绝经后女性性功能和阴道健康方面的有效性和安全性。
2023年1月至2024年12月期间,在罗马尼亚蒂米什瓦拉的三家私立妇科诊所进行了一项前瞻性对照临床试验。90名年龄在50至65岁之间、性功能指数(FSFI)评分≤23的绝经后女性被随机分为两组:一组接受三个月一次的自体PRP治疗,另一组接受为期12周的阴道雌三醇治疗。在基线、第6周和第12周时,使用经过验证的工具——女性性功能指数(FSFI)、阴道健康指数(VHI)、患者总体改善印象(PGI-I)和患者满意度评分来评估结果。
两个治疗组在12周时FSFI和VHI评分均有显著改善,PRP组总FSFI的平均增加略高(+10.1分对+9.3分),但无统计学意义。在润滑、弹性和性交困难方面也观察到临床改善。两组患者满意度都很高(PRP组为93.3%,激素治疗组为88.9%),研究期间未报告严重不良事件。PRP组副作用较少,无全身症状,表明其安全性良好。
PRP疗法耐受性良好,无激素,在性功能和阴道健康方面提供了具有临床意义的改善,与雌激素疗法相当。对于有激素禁忌症的女性或绝经后期女性可能特别有益。需要进一步的长期研究来证实这些发现并优化治疗方案。