Liang Ren-Jong, Hsu Shu-Hao, Chen Hsueh-Tien, Chen Wan-Han, Fu Han-Yu, Chen Hsin-Ying, Wang Hong-Jaan, Tang Sung-Ling
Clinical Pharmacy Department, Tri-Service General Hospital Keelung Branch, Keelung City 202006, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114201, Taiwan.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;18(7):991. doi: 10.3390/ph18070991.
: Hepatic clearance is important in determining clinical drug administration strategies. Achieving accurate hepatic clearance predictions through in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) relies on appropriate model selection, which is a critical step. Although numerous models have been developed to estimate drug dosage, some may fail to predict liver drug clearance owing to inappropriate hepatic clearance models during IVIVE. To address this limitation, an in silico-based model selection approach for optimizing hepatic clearance predictions was introduced in a previous study. The current study extends this strategy by verifying the accuracy of the selected models using ex situ experimental data, particularly for drugs whose model choices are influenced by protein binding. : Commonly prescribed drugs were classified according to their hepatic extraction ratios and protein-binding properties. Building on previous studies that employed multinomial logistic regression analysis for model selection, a three-phase classification method was implemented to identify five representative drugs: diazepam, diclofenac, rosuvastatin, fluoxetine, and tolbutamide. Subsequently, an isolated perfused rat liver (IPRL) system was used to evaluate the accuracy of the in silico method. : As the unbound fraction increased for diazepam and diclofenac, the most suitable predictive model shifted from the initially preferred well-stirred model (WSM) to the modified well-stirred model (MWSM). For rosuvastatin, the MWSM provided a more accurate prediction. These three capacity-limited, binding-sensitive drugs conformed to the outcomes predicted by the multinomial logistic regression analysis. Fluoxetine was best described by the WSM, which is consistent with its flow-limited classification. For tolbutamide, a representative capacity-limited, binding-insensitive drug, no significant differences were observed among the various models. : These findings demonstrate the accuracy of an in silico-based model selection approach for predicting liver metabolism and highlight its potential for guiding dosage adjustments. Furthermore, the IPRL system serves as a practical tool for validating the accuracy of the results derived from this approach.
肝脏清除率在确定临床给药策略中至关重要。通过体外到体内外推法(IVIVE)实现准确的肝脏清除率预测依赖于合适的模型选择,这是关键的一步。尽管已经开发了许多模型来估计药物剂量,但由于IVIVE过程中肝脏清除模型不合适,一些模型可能无法预测肝脏药物清除率。为了解决这一局限性,先前的一项研究引入了一种基于计算机模拟的模型选择方法来优化肝脏清除率预测。当前的研究通过使用异位实验数据验证所选模型的准确性来扩展这一策略,特别是对于模型选择受蛋白质结合影响的药物。
常用药物根据其肝脏提取率和蛋白质结合特性进行分类。基于先前采用多项逻辑回归分析进行模型选择的研究,实施了一种三相分类方法来识别五种代表性药物:地西泮、双氯芬酸、瑞舒伐他汀、氟西汀和甲苯磺丁脲。随后,使用离体灌注大鼠肝脏(IPRL)系统评估计算机模拟方法的准确性。
随着地西泮和双氯芬酸的未结合分数增加,最合适的预测模型从最初首选的充分搅拌模型(WSM)转变为改良的充分搅拌模型(MWSM)。对于瑞舒伐他汀,MWSM提供了更准确的预测。这三种容量受限、结合敏感的药物符合多项逻辑回归分析预测的结果。氟西汀最好用WSM来描述,这与其流量受限的分类一致。对于甲苯磺丁脲,一种具有代表性的容量受限、结合不敏感的药物,在各种模型之间未观察到显著差异。
这些发现证明了基于计算机模拟的模型选择方法在预测肝脏代谢方面的准确性,并突出了其在指导剂量调整方面的潜力。此外,IPRL系统是验证该方法所得结果准确性的实用工具。