Domaradzki Jarosław, Słowińska-Lisowska Małgorzata Renata
Department of Biological Principles of Physical Activity, Wroclaw University of Health and Sport Sciences, 51-612 Wrocław, Poland.
Nutrients. 2025 Jul 13;17(14):2307. doi: 10.3390/nu17142307.
: Psychological distress is common among university students and often co-occurs with unhealthy lifestyle patterns. However, most studies examine physical activity (PA) and dietary intake (DI) in isolation, overlooking how these behaviors interact under stress. This study aimed to identify and compare integrated PA and DI behavior patterns among students with low vs. high psychological distress. : A cross-sectional case-control design was used with 209 students (aged 19-21). Questionnaires included the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), Questionnaire of Eating Behavior (QEB), and Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 items (DASS-21). Behavioral patterns were assessed using a cophylogenetic approach (tanglegrams, cophenetic statistics), and predictive behaviors were analyzed using stepwise logistic regression. : Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) revealed significant group differences in PA-DI structure (F = 3.91, R = 0.0185, = 0.001). Tanglegram and PACo analyses showed tighter PA-DI alignment in high-distress individuals, suggesting more rigid, compensatory behavior profiles. Logistic regression identified vigorous PA (OR = 1.80, 95% CI: 1.33-2.50, < 0.001) and fast food intake (OR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.05-1.98, = 0.026) as significant distress indicators. Sweets intake showed a non-significant trend (OR = 1.33, = 0.064). : Students with higher psychological distress exhibit complex lifestyle co-patterns combining risk (e.g., fast food) and compensatory behaviors (e.g., vigorous PA). Health promotion should address PA and DI jointly, and screening for distress should be integrated into student wellness programs.
心理困扰在大学生中很常见,并且常常与不健康的生活方式同时出现。然而,大多数研究孤立地考察身体活动(PA)和饮食摄入(DI),而忽略了这些行为在压力下是如何相互作用的。本研究旨在识别和比较心理困扰程度低与高的学生之间综合的身体活动和饮食摄入行为模式。
采用横断面病例对照设计,研究对象为209名19 - 21岁的学生。问卷包括国际身体活动问卷(IPAQ)、饮食行为问卷(QEB)和抑郁焦虑压力量表 - 21项(DASS - 21)。使用共系统发育方法(缠结图、共亲合统计)评估行为模式,并使用逐步逻辑回归分析预测行为。
置换多元方差分析(PERMANOVA)显示身体活动 - 饮食摄入结构存在显著的组间差异(F = 3.91,R = 0.0185,P = 0.001)。缠结图和PACo分析表明,高困扰个体的身体活动 - 饮食摄入关联更紧密,表明行为模式更刻板、具有补偿性。逻辑回归确定剧烈身体活动(OR = 1.80,95% CI:1.33 - 2.50,P < 0.001)和快餐摄入(OR = 1.43,95% CI:1.05 - 1.98,P = 0.026)是显著的困扰指标。甜食摄入呈现非显著趋势(OR = 1.33,P = 0.064)。
心理困扰程度较高的学生表现出复杂的生活方式共同模式,包括风险行为(如快餐)和补偿行为(如剧烈身体活动)。健康促进应同时关注身体活动和饮食摄入,并且应将困扰筛查纳入学生健康计划。