• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用随机森林模型评估环境和管理变量对山地草甸产量和饲料质量的影响

Assessing the Impact of Environmental and Management Variables on Mountain Meadow Yield and Feed Quality Using a Random Forest Model.

作者信息

Jarne Adrián, Usón Asunción, Reiné Ramón

机构信息

Departamento de Ciencias Agrarias y del Medio Natural, Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad de Zaragoza, Ctra Cuarte s/n, 22071 Huesca, Spain.

出版信息

Plants (Basel). 2025 Jul 11;14(14):2150. doi: 10.3390/plants14142150.

DOI:10.3390/plants14142150
PMID:40733386
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12300228/
Abstract

Seasonal climate variability and agronomic management profoundly influence both the productivity and nutritive value of temperate hay meadows. We analyzed five years of data (2019, 2020, 2022-2024) from 15 meadows in the central Spanish Pyrenees to quantify how environmental variables (January-June minimum temperatures, rainfall), management variables (fertilization rates (N, P, K), livestock load, cutting date), and vegetation (plant biodiversity (Shannon index)) drive total biomass yield (kg ha), protein content (%), and Relative Feed Value (RFV). Using Random Forest regression with rigorous cross-validation, our yield model achieved an R of 0.802 (RMSE = 983.8 kg ha), the protein model an R of 0.786 (RMSE = 1.71%), and the RFV model an R of 0.718 (RMSE = 13.86). Variable importance analyses revealed that March rainfall was the dominant predictor of yield (importance = 0.430), reflecting the critical role of early-spring moisture in tiller establishment and canopy development. In contrast, cutting date exerted the greatest influence on protein (importance = 0.366) and RFV (importance = 0.344), underscoring the sensitivity of forage quality to harvest timing. Lower minimum temperatures-particularly in March and May-and moderate livestock densities (up to 1 LU) were also positively associated with enhanced protein and RFV, whereas higher biodiversity (Shannon ≥ 3) produced modest gains in feed quality without substantial yield penalties. These findings suggest that adaptive management-prioritizing soil moisture conservation in early spring, timely harvesting, balanced grazing intensity, and maintenance of plant diversity-can optimize both the quantity and quality of hay meadow biomass under variable climatic conditions.

摘要

季节性气候变率和农艺管理深刻影响着温带干草草地的生产力和营养价值。我们分析了西班牙比利牛斯山脉中部15块草地连续五年(2019年、2020年、2022年至2024年)的数据,以量化环境变量(1月至6月最低气温、降雨量)、管理变量(施肥量(氮、磷、钾)、载畜量、刈割日期)和植被(植物生物多样性(香农指数))如何驱动总生物量产量(千克/公顷)、蛋白质含量(%)和相对饲用价值(RFV)。通过带有严格交叉验证的随机森林回归分析,我们的产量模型R值为0.802(均方根误差=983.8千克/公顷),蛋白质模型R值为0.786(均方根误差=1.71%),RFV模型R值为0.718(均方根误差=13.86)。变量重要性分析表明,3月降雨量是产量的主要预测因子(重要性=0.430),这反映了早春水分在分蘖形成和冠层发育中的关键作用。相比之下,刈割日期对蛋白质(重要性=0.366)和RFV(重要性=0.344)的影响最大,这突出了饲草质量对收获时间的敏感性。较低的最低气温——尤其是3月和5月——以及适度的载畜密度(最高1 LU)也与蛋白质和RFV的提高呈正相关,而较高的生物多样性(香农指数≥3)在对产量没有实质性影响的情况下,使饲料质量略有提高。这些发现表明,适应性管理——优先在早春保护土壤水分、适时收获、平衡放牧强度以及维持植物多样性——可以在多变的气候条件下优化干草草地生物量的数量和质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/29b87a1391d4/plants-14-02150-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/2605af940778/plants-14-02150-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/b7c8f05b9085/plants-14-02150-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/fe082792a793/plants-14-02150-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/f5fe835dc780/plants-14-02150-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/d890a003df6e/plants-14-02150-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/c1886dfea34c/plants-14-02150-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/a87aa1f0b9fe/plants-14-02150-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/1c59522184e1/plants-14-02150-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/7aa66c099cdf/plants-14-02150-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/bcc784960651/plants-14-02150-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/3475c47cc695/plants-14-02150-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/dd99c93ff5f5/plants-14-02150-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/34ec676a9f2b/plants-14-02150-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/29b87a1391d4/plants-14-02150-g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/2605af940778/plants-14-02150-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/b7c8f05b9085/plants-14-02150-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/fe082792a793/plants-14-02150-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/f5fe835dc780/plants-14-02150-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/d890a003df6e/plants-14-02150-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/c1886dfea34c/plants-14-02150-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/a87aa1f0b9fe/plants-14-02150-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/1c59522184e1/plants-14-02150-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/7aa66c099cdf/plants-14-02150-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/bcc784960651/plants-14-02150-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/3475c47cc695/plants-14-02150-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/dd99c93ff5f5/plants-14-02150-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/34ec676a9f2b/plants-14-02150-g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0aa8/12300228/29b87a1391d4/plants-14-02150-g014.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the Impact of Environmental and Management Variables on Mountain Meadow Yield and Feed Quality Using a Random Forest Model.使用随机森林模型评估环境和管理变量对山地草甸产量和饲料质量的影响
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jul 11;14(14):2150. doi: 10.3390/plants14142150.
2
Optimal fertilizer rate and sowing density can improve oat quality, yield and N and P comprehensive efficiency in the Loess Plateau of China.在中国黄土高原,最佳施肥量和播种密度可提高燕麦品质、产量以及氮磷综合利用效率。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jun 13;16:1604427. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1604427. eCollection 2025.
3
Impacts of nitrogen addition on plant biodiversity in mountain grasslands depend on dose, application duration and climate: a systematic review.氮添加对山地草原植物生物多样性的影响取决于剂量、施用量和持续时间以及气候:系统评价。
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Jan;22(1):110-20. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12986. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
4
Intake, digestion, and rumen microbial impacts of black soldier fly larvae and frass provided as protein supplements to cattle consuming forage.作为蛋白质补充剂提供给采食草料的牛的黑水虻幼虫和虫粪的摄入量、消化情况及对瘤胃微生物的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf077.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Regional and type-specific variations in the global seasonality of human parainfluenza viruses and the influence of climatic factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.人类副流感病毒全球季节性的区域和类型特异性变化以及气候因素的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Aug;13(8):e1425-e1435. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00188-3.
7
Optimization of Hydroponic Wheat Sprouts as an Alternative Livestock Feed: Yield and Biochemical Composition Under Different Fertilization Regimes.水培小麦芽作为替代牲畜饲料的优化:不同施肥制度下的产量和生化成分
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jul 14;14(14):2166. doi: 10.3390/plants14142166.
8
Spectral sensing for forage nutritive value determination of cool season, grass pastures during the grazing season.放牧季节冷季禾本科牧草营养价值测定的光谱传感技术
J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf151.
9
Fertilization decreases the effect of ammonium nitrogen on microorganisms in Chinese meadows during rest-grazing.在休牧期,施肥会降低铵态氮对中国草甸中微生物的影响。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jun 18;16:1608011. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1608011. eCollection 2025.
10
Elevation-dependent shifts in soil phosphorus forms and phosphorus-solubilizing microbial diversity suggest enhanced bioavailable phosphorus cycling with rising temperatures.土壤磷形态和磷溶解微生物多样性随海拔高度的变化表明,随着温度升高,生物可利用磷的循环增强。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul 9:e0130024. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01300-24.

本文引用的文献

1
Yield prediction in a peanut breeding program using remote sensing data and machine learning algorithms.利用遥感数据和机器学习算法进行花生育种计划中的产量预测。
Front Plant Sci. 2024 Feb 20;15:1339864. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1339864. eCollection 2024.
2
Impacts of grazing on ground cover, soil physical properties and soil loss via surface erosion: A novel geospatial modelling approach.放牧对地表覆盖、土壤物理性质及地表侵蚀造成的土壤流失的影响:一种新型地理空间建模方法。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 1;287:112206. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112206. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
3
Machine Learning in Agriculture: A Review.
农业中的机器学习:综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Aug 14;18(8):2674. doi: 10.3390/s18082674.
4
Riparian Meadow Response to Modern Conservation Grazing Management.河岸草甸对现代保护性放牧管理的响应。
Environ Manage. 2017 Sep;60(3):383-395. doi: 10.1007/s00267-017-0897-1. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
5
Effects of reduced summer precipitation on productivity and forage quality of floodplain meadows at the Elbe and the Rhine River.夏季降水减少对易北河和莱茵河漫滩草甸生产力及饲草质量的影响
PLoS One. 2015 May 7;10(5):e0124140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124140. eCollection 2015.
6
Effects of warming and grazing on soil N availability, species composition, and ANPP in an alpine meadow.变暖与放牧对高寒草甸土壤氮素有效性、物种组成及地上净初级生产力的影响。
Ecology. 2012 Nov;93(11):2365-76. doi: 10.1890/11-1408.1.