Donovan Mitchell, Monaghan Ross
AgResearch Limited Invermay Agricultural Centre Puddle Alley, Private Bag 50014, Mosgiel, 9053, New Zealand.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 1;287:112206. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112206. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
Agricultural expansion and overgrazing are globally recognized as key contributors to accelerated soil degradation and surface erosion, with direct consequences for land productivity, and environmental health. Measured impacts of livestock grazing on soil physical properties and ground cover are absent in soil loss models (e.g., Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, RUSLE) despite significant impacts to surface erosion. We developed a novel model that captures changes to ground cover and soil properties (permeability and structure) as a function of grazing intensity (density, duration, history, and stock type), as well as soil clay and water contents. The model outputs were integrated within RUSLE to calculate a treaded soil erodibility (K) and grazed cover factors (C) at seasonal timescales (3-month windows) to account for variability in soil moisture content, grazing practices, vegetation growth and senescence, and rainfall. Grazed pastures and winter-forage paddocks exhibit distinct changes in soil erodibility and soil losses, which are most pronounced for wet soils when plant cover is reduced/minimal. On average, typical pasture grazing pressures increase soil erodibility by 6% (range = 1-90%), compared to 60% (18-310%) for intensive winter forage paddocks. Further, negligible ground cover following forage crop grazing increases surface erosion by a factor of 10 (±) relative to grazed pastures, which exhibit soil losses (μ = 83 t km yr; range = 11.6 to 246) comparable to natural uncropped catchments (100-200 t km yr). Exacerbated soil losses from winter forage-crop paddocks (μ = 1,100 t km yr) arose from significant degradation of soil physical properties and exposing soils directly to rainfall and runoff. We conclude that proactive decisions to reduce treading damage and avoid high-density grazing will far exceed reactive practices seeking to trap sediments lost from grazed lands.
农业扩张和过度放牧在全球范围内被公认为是加速土壤退化和地表侵蚀的主要因素,对土地生产力和环境健康产生直接影响。尽管牲畜放牧对地表侵蚀有重大影响,但土壤流失模型(如修订通用土壤流失方程,RUSLE)中缺少对牲畜放牧对土壤物理性质和地被物影响的量化。我们开发了一个新模型,该模型能够捕捉地被物以及土壤性质(渗透性和结构)随放牧强度(密度、持续时间、历史和牲畜类型)的变化,以及土壤黏土含量和含水量的变化。该模型的输出结果被整合到RUSLE中,以计算季节性时间尺度(3个月窗口)下的践踏土壤可蚀性(K)和放牧覆盖因子(C),以考虑土壤湿度、放牧方式、植被生长与衰老以及降雨的变异性。放牧牧场和冬季饲料围场的土壤可蚀性和土壤流失呈现出明显变化,在植物覆盖减少/最少时,湿润土壤的这些变化最为显著。平均而言,典型的牧场放牧压力使土壤可蚀性增加6%(范围为1 - 90%),而集约化冬季饲料围场则为60%(18 - 310%)。此外,饲料作物放牧后可忽略不计的地被物使地表侵蚀相对于放牧牧场增加了10倍(±),放牧牧场的土壤流失量(μ = 83 t km yr;范围为11.6至246)与天然未开垦集水区(100 - 200 t km yr)相当。冬季饲料作物围场加剧的土壤流失(μ = 1,100 t km yr)源于土壤物理性质的显著退化以及土壤直接暴露于降雨和径流。我们得出结论,减少践踏损害和避免高密度放牧的积极决策将远远超过试图截留放牧土地流失沉积物的被动做法。