• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会经济地位不利的老年人频繁使用急诊科的驱动因素:一项定性研究。

Drivers of Frequent Emergency Department Use in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Older Adults: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Chary Anita, Bhananker Annika, Suh Michelle, Leavitt David, Brickhouse Elise, Tamma Shreya, Ramirez Jose, Rios Mariana, Naik Aanand D, Samuels-Kalow Margaret, George Naomi

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Sep;73(9):2808-2818. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19616. Epub 2025 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1111/jgs.19616
PMID:40734523
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The emergency department (ED) is the safety net for and a common point of healthcare access for socioeconomically disadvantaged older adults. Little is known about socioeconomically disadvantaged older ED patients' perspectives on their health, healthcare access, and ED use. Such insights could guide tailored interventions to address unmet clinical and health-related social needs (HRSN).

METHODS

We performed a qualitative study with older adults in a single public safety net hospital ED. We interviewed patients age 60+ who had ≥ 4 ED 4 visits in the past year. Semi-structured interviews explored perceived health needs and motivations underlying ED visits. We screened for HRSN using validated measures. We performed content analysis to evaluate key drivers of ED use based on Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use and used principles of narrative analysis to identify distinct profiles of older patients with frequent ED use.

RESULTS

Among 68 interview participants, 40% identified as Black and 43% as Hispanic. Sixty percent had health insurance. Most participants (63%) reported HRSN, but rarely described these as primary drivers of ED use. Instead, poor access to outpatient care and medical complexity related to condition-specific needs were the most salient factors. Six distinct profiles emerged of patients who: (1) lacked insurance and primary care; (2) faced an acute condition; (3) held acute concerns related to serious underlying diseases; (4) had chronic disease whose management bordered between outpatient and inpatient settings; (5) had a sentinel event (e.g., fall, surgery) with cascading sequelae; (6) faced recurrent challenges managing indwelling catheters, tubes, and long-term vascular access.

CONCLUSIONS

Among socioeconomically disadvantaged older adults in our sample, medical complexity was a more salient driver of frequent ED use than unmet social needs. Innovations to strengthen outpatient care and offer alternatives to ED and hospital admission are needed for this population.

摘要

背景

急诊科是社会经济弱势老年人的医疗安全网和常见就医点。对于社会经济弱势的老年急诊患者对自身健康、医疗服务可及性及急诊科使用情况的看法,我们知之甚少。此类见解可为针对未满足的临床及健康相关社会需求(HRSN)的定制干预措施提供指导。

方法

我们在一家公立安全网医院的急诊科对老年人进行了一项定性研究。我们采访了过去一年中急诊就诊≥4次的60岁及以上患者。半结构化访谈探讨了感知到的健康需求以及急诊就诊的潜在动机。我们使用经过验证的测量方法筛查HRSN。我们进行了内容分析,以根据安德森的医疗服务使用行为模型评估急诊使用的关键驱动因素,并运用叙事分析原则来识别频繁使用急诊科的老年患者的不同特征。

结果

在68名访谈参与者中,40%为黑人,43%为西班牙裔。60%的人有医疗保险。大多数参与者(63%)报告了HRSN,但很少将其描述为急诊使用的主要驱动因素。相反,门诊医疗服务可及性差以及与特定病情需求相关的医疗复杂性是最突出的因素。出现了六种不同特征的患者:(1)缺乏保险和初级保健;(2)面临急性病症;(3)对严重基础疾病存在急性担忧;(4)患有慢性病,其管理介于门诊和住院环境之间;(5)发生了具有连锁后遗症的哨兵事件(如跌倒、手术);(6)在管理留置导管、引流管和长期血管通路方面面临反复挑战。

结论

在我们样本中的社会经济弱势老年人中,医疗复杂性比未满足的社会需求更显著地驱动了频繁的急诊使用。需要进行创新以加强门诊医疗服务,并为该人群提供急诊科和住院治疗的替代方案。

相似文献

1
Drivers of Frequent Emergency Department Use in Socioeconomically Disadvantaged Older Adults: A Qualitative Study.社会经济地位不利的老年人频繁使用急诊科的驱动因素:一项定性研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Sep;73(9):2808-2818. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19616. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
4
Older Adults' Experiences of Emergency Department Admission Decisions: A Qualitative Study in a Public Safety Net Hospital.老年人急诊科入院决策的经历:在一家公共安全网医院进行的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(7):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09250-3. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
5
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
6
Remote and digital services in UK general practice 2021-2023: the Remote by Default 2 longitudinal qualitative study synopsis.2021 - 2023年英国全科医疗中的远程和数字服务:“默认远程”2纵向定性研究概要
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(31):1-49. doi: 10.3310/QQTT4411.
7
Are unmet health related social needs associated with emergency department utilization among Medicare beneficiaries?未满足的与健康相关的社会需求是否与医疗保险受益人的急诊科就诊率有关?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12554-7.
8
How Do Individuals Perceive Diagnostic Labels and Explanations for Hip Pain? A Qualitative Study Among Adults With Persistent Hip Pain.个体如何看待髋关节疼痛的诊断标签和解释?一项针对持续性髋关节疼痛成年人的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003445.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Older Adults' Experiences of Emergency Department Admission Decisions: A Qualitative Study in a Public Safety Net Hospital.老年人急诊科入院决策的经历:在一家公共安全网医院进行的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May;40(7):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09250-3. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
2
A scoping review of geriatric emergency medicine research transparency in diversity, equity, and inclusion reporting.老年急诊医学研究中多样性、公平性和包容性报告透明度的范围综述。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Nov;72(11):3551-3566. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19052. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
3
Pragmatism and feasibility: A qualitative study of experiences implementing and upgrading care in geriatric emergency departments.
实用主义与可行性:一项关于老年急诊科实施和升级护理经验的定性研究
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Jun 26;5(4):e13216. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13216. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Frailty assessment tools in the emergency department: A geriatric emergency department guidelines 2.0 scoping review.急诊科的衰弱评估工具:老年急诊科指南2.0范围综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Dec 29;5(1):e13084. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13084. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Missed Screening for Adverse Social Determinants of Health and Emergency Department Utilization.健康不良社会决定因素筛查缺失与急诊科利用情况
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Apr;83(4):416-418. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.11.008. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
6
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Considerations in the Geriatric Emergency Department Patient.多样性、公平性和包容性:老年急诊患者需要考虑的因素。
Clin Geriatr Med. 2023 Nov;39(4):673-686. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2023.04.009. Epub 2023 May 10.
7
Examination of geriatric care processes implemented in level 1 and level 2 geriatric emergency departments.对一级和二级老年急诊科实施的老年护理流程的检查。
J Geriatr Emerg Med. 2022 Winter;3(4). doi: 10.17294/2694-4715.1041. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
8
Interventions to Improve Outcomes for High-Need, High-Cost Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.改善高需求、高费用患者结局的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jan;38(1):185-194. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07809-6. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
9
An Assessment of the Social Determinants of Health in an Urban Emergency Department.城市急诊科的健康社会决定因素评估。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 15;22(4):890-897. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.4.50476.
10
Implementation of a geriatric emergency medicine assessment team decreases hospital length of stay.老年急诊医学评估团队的实施可缩短住院时间。
Am J Emerg Med. 2022 May;55:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.02.027. Epub 2022 Feb 21.