• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对一级和二级老年急诊科实施的老年护理流程的检查。

Examination of geriatric care processes implemented in level 1 and level 2 geriatric emergency departments.

作者信息

Santangelo Ilianna, Ahmad Surriya, Liu Shan, Southerland Lauren T, Carpenter Christopher, Hwang Ula, Lesser Adriane, Tidwell Nicole, Biese Kevin, Kennedy Maura

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

SUNY Downstate Medical Center / Kings County Hospital Center.

出版信息

J Geriatr Emerg Med. 2022 Winter;3(4). doi: 10.17294/2694-4715.1041. Epub 2023 Feb 17.

DOI:10.17294/2694-4715.1041
PMID:36970655
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10035774/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Older adults constitute a large and growing proportion of the population and have unique care needs in the emergency department (ED) setting. The geriatric ED accreditation program aims to improve emergency care provided to older adults by standardizing care provided across accredited geriatric EDs (GED) and through implementation of geriatric-specific care processes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate select care processes at accredited level 1 and level 2 GEDs.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of a cohort of level 1 and level 2 GEDs that received accreditation between May 7, 2018 and March 1, 2021. We selected five GED care processes for analysis: initiatives related to delirium, screening for dementia, assessment of function and functional decline, geriatric falls, and minimizing medication-related adverse events. For all protocols, a trained research assistant abstracted information on the tool used or care process, which patients received the interventions, and staff members were involved in the care process; additional information was abstracted specific to individual care processes.

RESULTS

A total of 35 level 1 and 2 GEDs were included in this analysis. Among care processes studied, geriatric falls were the most common (31 GEDs, 89%) followed by geriatric pain management (25 GEDs, 71%), minimizing the use of potentially inappropriate medications (24 EDs, 69%), delirium (22 GEDs, 63%), medication reconciliation (21 GEDs, 60%), functional assessment (20 GEDs, 57%), and dementia screening (17 GEDs, 49%). For protocols related to delirium, dementia, function, and geriatric falls, sites used an array of different screening tools and there was heterogeneity in who performed the screening and which patients were assessed. Medication reconciliation protocols leveraged pharmacists, pharmacy technicians and/or nurses. Protocols on avoiding potentially inappropriate medication administration generally focused on ED administration of medications and used the BEERs criteria, and few sites indicated whether pain medications protocols had dosing modifications for age and/or renal function.

CONCLUSION

This study provides a snapshot of care processes implemented in level 1 and level 2 accredited GEDs and demonstrates significant heterogeny in how these care processes are implemented.

摘要

引言

老年人在人口中所占比例很大且不断增长,在急诊科(ED)环境中有独特的护理需求。老年急诊科认证计划旨在通过规范经认证的老年急诊科(GED)提供的护理以及实施针对老年人的护理流程,来改善为老年人提供的急诊护理。本研究的目的是评估经认证的一级和二级GED的特定护理流程。

方法

这是一项对2018年5月7日至2021年3月1日期间获得认证的一级和二级GED队列的横断面分析。我们选择了五个GED护理流程进行分析:与谵妄相关的举措、痴呆筛查、功能及功能衰退评估、老年跌倒以及尽量减少与药物相关的不良事件。对于所有方案,一名经过培训的研究助理提取了有关所使用的工具或护理流程、接受干预的患者以及参与护理流程的工作人员的信息;针对各个护理流程还提取了其他特定信息。

结果

本分析共纳入35个一级和二级GED。在所研究的护理流程中,老年跌倒最为常见(31个GED,89%),其次是老年疼痛管理(25个GED,71%)、尽量减少使用潜在不适当药物(24个急诊科,69%)、谵妄(22个GED,63%)、用药核对(21个GED,60%)、功能评估(20个GED,57%)和痴呆筛查(17个GED,49%)。对于与谵妄、痴呆、功能和老年跌倒相关的方案,各机构使用了一系列不同的筛查工具,在进行筛查的人员以及评估的患者方面存在异质性。用药核对方案借助了药剂师、药房技术员和/或护士。避免潜在不适当药物给药的方案通常侧重于急诊科的药物给药,并使用了《老年人潜在不适当用药筛查工具》标准,很少有机构表明疼痛药物方案是否针对年龄和/或肾功能进行了剂量调整。

结论

本研究提供了一级和二级认证GED中实施的护理流程的概况,并表明这些护理流程的实施方式存在显著异质性。

相似文献

1
Examination of geriatric care processes implemented in level 1 and level 2 geriatric emergency departments.对一级和二级老年急诊科实施的老年护理流程的检查。
J Geriatr Emerg Med. 2022 Winter;3(4). doi: 10.17294/2694-4715.1041. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
Dissemination and implementation of age-friendly care and geriatric emergency department accreditation at Veterans Affairs hospitals.在退伍军人事务医院推广和实施关爱老年人护理及老年急诊科认证。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Apr;30(4):270-277. doi: 10.1111/acem.14665. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
3
Developing and Implementing a Geriatric Emergency Department (GED): Overview and Characteristics of GED Visits.制定和实施老年急诊部(GED):GED 就诊概述和特征。
J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;61(2):131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.02.036. Epub 2021 May 15.
4
Study protocol for IMAGE: implementing multidisciplinary assessments for geriatric patients in an emergency department observation unit, a hybrid effectiveness/implementation study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.IMAGE研究方案:在急诊科观察单元对老年患者实施多学科评估,一项使用实施研究综合框架的有效性/实施混合研究。
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:28. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00015-7. eCollection 2020.
5
Reach and Adoption of a Geriatric Emergency Department Accreditation Program in the United States.美国老年急诊部认证计划的覆盖范围和采用情况。
Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;79(4):367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
6
Quality indicators for a geriatric emergency care (GeriQ-ED) - an evidence-based delphi consensus approach to improve the care of geriatric patients in the emergency department.老年急诊质量指标(GeriQ-ED)——一种基于证据的德尔菲共识方法,旨在改善急诊科老年患者的护理。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 16;28(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00756-3.
7
Evaluation of Pediatric Readiness Using Simulation in General Emergency Departments in a Medically Underserved Region.利用模拟技术在医疗资源匮乏地区的综合急诊部门评估儿科应急准备情况。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2024 May 1;40(5):335-340. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000003056. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
8
Tracking the Rise of Geriatric Emergency Departments in the United States.追踪美国老年急诊部的兴起。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Aug;39(8):871-879. doi: 10.1177/0733464818813030. Epub 2018 Nov 18.
9
Pragmatism and feasibility: A qualitative study of experiences implementing and upgrading care in geriatric emergency departments.实用主义与可行性:一项关于老年急诊科实施和升级护理经验的定性研究
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Jun 26;5(4):e13216. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13216. eCollection 2024 Aug.
10
Predicting geriatric falls following an episode of emergency department care: a systematic review.预测急诊科护理后的老年跌倒:一项系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1069-82. doi: 10.1111/acem.12488. Epub 2014 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Physical and Occupational Therapy Evaluation in the Emergency Department for Older Adults With Falls: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort.急诊科对老年跌倒患者进行物理和职业治疗评估的结果:一项回顾性多中心队列研究
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 May 15;6(4):100141. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100141. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Team-based, Multidisciplinary Care in the Emergency Department.急诊科的团队协作多学科护理
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2025 May;43(2):361-377. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2024.08.014. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
3
Emergency Department Programs to Support Medication Safety in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.支持老年人用药安全的急诊科项目:系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250814. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0814.
4
Pragmatism and feasibility: A qualitative study of experiences implementing and upgrading care in geriatric emergency departments.实用主义与可行性:一项关于老年急诊科实施和升级护理经验的定性研究
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Jun 26;5(4):e13216. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13216. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Delirium and Delirium Prevention in the Emergency Department.急诊科的谵妄与谵妄预防
Clin Geriatr Med. 2023 Nov;39(4):535-551. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2023.05.006. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Do we really need another risk prediction rule? Yes, we do.我们真的还需要另一个风险预测规则吗?是的,我们需要。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 May;29(5):678-680. doi: 10.1111/acem.14458. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
2
Reach and Adoption of a Geriatric Emergency Department Accreditation Program in the United States.美国老年急诊部认证计划的覆盖范围和采用情况。
Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Apr;79(4):367-373. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
3
Delirium Prevention, Detection, and Treatment in Emergency Medicine Settings: A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network Scoping Review and Consensus Statement.急危重症医学环境中谵妄的预防、检测和治疗:老年急诊护理应用研究 (GEAR) 网络范围界定综述和共识声明。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jan;28(1):19-35. doi: 10.1111/acem.14166. Epub 2020 Dec 12.
4
A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale.临床虚弱量表的范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7.
5
Can an Emergency Department-Initiated Intervention Prevent Subsequent Falls and Health Care Use in Older Adults? A Randomized Controlled Trial.急诊科启动的干预措施能否预防老年人后续跌倒和医疗保健利用?一项随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;76(6):739-750. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
6
A Randomized Trial of a Multifactorial Strategy to Prevent Serious Fall Injuries.多因素策略预防严重跌倒伤害的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 9;383(2):129-140. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002183.
7
Geriatric Screeners 2.0: Time for a Paradigm Shift in Emergency Department Vulnerability Research.老年筛查工具2.0:急诊科脆弱性研究范式转变的时机
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1402-1405. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16502. Epub 2020 May 13.
8
Validation of the Clinical Frailty Scale for Prediction of Thirty-Day Mortality in the Emergency Department.临床虚弱量表对急诊科 30 天死亡率预测的验证。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;76(3):291-300. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.03.028. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
9
SPMSQ for risk stratification of older patients in the emergency department : An exploratory prospective cohort study.急诊科老年患者风险分层的简易精神状态问卷简表(SPMSQ):一项探索性前瞻性队列研究。
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Nov;52(Suppl 4):222-228. doi: 10.1007/s00391-019-01626-z. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
10
Potentially inappropriate medication prescribing in the elderly: Is the Beers Criteria relevant in the Emergency Department today?老年人潜在不适当药物处方:Beers 标准在当今急诊科仍然适用吗?
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;37(9):1734-1737. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.052. Epub 2019 May 28.