Suppr超能文献

新冠病毒疫苗接种后血液透析患者与医护人员中新冠病毒IgG反应的比较。

Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 IgG responses in hemodialysis patients and healthcare workers after COVID-19 vaccination.

作者信息

Öztürk Hakkı, Özsoy Metin, Tuna Ayşegül, Varlibas Artuner, Cesur Salih, Aksoy Altan, Çifci Aydın, Demir Mehmet Emin

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Epidemiologist, Dialysis Physician, Private Ankara Dialysis Center, Ankara, Türkiye.

Clinic of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, University of Health Sciences, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 15;16:1586468. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1586468. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to compare SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody levels in hemodialysis (HD) patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) after COVID-19 vaccination and to identify factors influencing these levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 193 participants were included: 104 HD patients and 89 age- and sex-matched HCWs as controls. All had completed a primary COVID-19 vaccination series (two doses of CoronaVac or BNT162b2) and a booster dose. SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike IgG was measured at least one month after the last vaccine dose using a commercial immunoassay (Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant, CMIA). Results in Arbitrary Units (AU/mL) were converted to WHO standard Binding Antibody Units (BAU/mL) (1 AU/mL = 0.142 BAU/mL). IgG titers ≥7.1 BAU/mL (equivalent to 50 AU/mL) were considered positive.

RESULTS

All participants had positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies. There were no statistically significant differences in IgG levels between HD patients and HCWs at any individual time interval (<3 months, 3-6 months, or >6 months) or in the overall mean titers (HD: 1259 ± 1112 BAU/mL; HCW: 1002 ± 765 BAU/mL; p = 0.216). No individual in either group had an IgG titer below 7.1 BAU/mL. Vaccine type, dialysis vintage, and presence of comorbidities did not significantly impact antibody levels. In the HCWs group, those vaccinated only with CoronaVac had significantly lower IgG levels than those receiving only BNT162b2 or a heterologous regimen (CoronaVac followed by BNT162b2). However, among HD patients, IgG levels did not differ by vaccine regimen.

CONCLUSION

HD patients mounted a SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody response comparable to that of healthy HCWs, with no participant falling below the positivity threshold. Dialysis duration and comorbid conditions did not significantly affect post-vaccination IgG levels. While HCWs who received only CoronaVac showed lower antibody titers than those who received BNT162b2 or a heterologous schedule, this difference was not observed in HD patients. These results suggest that COVID-19 vaccination elicits a robust humoral immune response in the HD population, underscoring the benefit of vaccination in this high-risk group.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较血液透析(HD)患者和医护人员(HCW)在接种新冠病毒疫苗后SARS-CoV-2 IgG抗体水平,并确定影响这些水平的因素。

材料与方法

共纳入193名参与者:104名HD患者和89名年龄及性别匹配的医护人员作为对照。所有人均完成了新冠病毒疫苗的基础接种系列(两剂科兴疫苗或BNT162b2)及一剂加强针。在最后一剂疫苗接种至少1个月后,使用商业免疫测定法(雅培SARS-CoV-2 IgG II定量检测,CMIA)检测SARS-CoV-2抗刺突IgG。以任意单位(AU/mL)表示的结果转换为世界卫生组织标准结合抗体单位(BAU/mL)(1 AU/mL = 0.142 BAU/mL)。IgG滴度≥7.1 BAU/mL(相当于50 AU/mL)被视为阳性。

结果

所有参与者的SARS-CoV-2 IgG抗体均为阳性。在任何个体时间间隔(<3个月、3 - 6个月或>6个月),HD患者和医护人员的IgG水平或总体平均滴度均无统计学显著差异(HD:1259 ± 1112 BAU/mL;医护人员:1002 ± 765 BAU/mL;p = 0.216)。两组中均无个体的IgG滴度低于7.1 BAU/mL。疫苗类型、透析时间及合并症的存在对抗体水平均无显著影响。在医护人员组中,仅接种科兴疫苗的人员的IgG水平显著低于仅接种BNT162b2或采用异源接种方案(先接种科兴疫苗后接种BNT162b2)的人员。然而,在HD患者中,IgG水平在不同疫苗接种方案间并无差异。

结论

HD患者产生的SARS-CoV-2 IgG抗体反应与健康医护人员相当,且无参与者低于阳性阈值。透析时长和合并症并未显著影响接种疫苗后的IgG水平。虽然仅接种科兴疫苗的医护人员的抗体滴度低于接种BNT162b2或采用异源接种方案的人员,但在HD患者中未观察到这种差异。这些结果表明,新冠病毒疫苗接种在HD人群中引发了强烈的体液免疫反应,凸显了在这一高危人群中接种疫苗的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be25/12303797/79162514186a/fimmu-16-1586468-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验