• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜取石术围手术期持续使用阿司匹林的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

The efficacy of continuing aspirin in the perioperative period during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Hua Lingling, Zhou Hui

机构信息

Lingling Hua, Operating Room, Third People's Hospital of Changxing County, Huzhou, Zhejiang Province 313103, P.R. China.

Hui Zhou, Department of Operating Room, Changxing County People's Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang Province 313100, P.R. China.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):2092-2100. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.7.12240.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.41.7.12240
PMID:40735570
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12302093/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study was conducted to assess the safety of continuing aspirin during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS

PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies up to 5 February 2025. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for change in hemoglobin, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, need for transfusion and postoperative thrombotic events between patients continuing aspirin vs patients not on any antithrombotic therapy in the perioperative period (controls).

RESULTS

Six studies were included. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in change in hemoglobin levels (MD: -0.03 95% CI: -0.24, 0.18 I=31%), estimated blood loss (MD: -6.91 95% CI: -14.36, 0.54 I=0%), length of hospital stay (MD: -0.31 95% CI: -0.99, 0.37 I=94%), all complications (OR: 1.29 95% CI: 0.94, 1.79 I=0%), serious complications (OR: 1.95 95% CI: 0.88, 4.29 I=38%), bleeding complications (OR: 1.11 95% CI: 0.71, 1.73 I=0%), need for transfusion (OR: 1.10 95% CI: 0.62, 1.94 I=0%), and postoperative thrombotic events (OR: 1.30 95% CI: 0.21, 8.24 I=36%) between patients continuing aspirin and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuing aspirin during the perioperative period may not increase the risk of adverse outcomes of PCNL. However, given the scarce data further prospective and Multi-Centre studies are needed to improve the quality of evidence.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)期间继续使用阿司匹林的安全性。

方法

检索了截至2025年2月5日的PubMed、CENTRAL、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science等数据库中的相关研究。对围手术期继续使用阿司匹林的患者与未接受任何抗血栓治疗的患者(对照组)之间血红蛋白变化、失血量、住院时间、并发症、输血需求和术后血栓形成事件进行随机效应荟萃分析。

结果

纳入六项研究。荟萃分析显示,继续使用阿司匹林的患者与对照组相比,血红蛋白水平变化(MD:-0.03,95%CI:-0.24,0.18,I=31%)、估计失血量(MD:-6.91,95%CI:-14.36,0.54,I=0%)、住院时间(MD:-0.31,95%CI:-0.99,0.37,I=94%)、所有并发症(OR:1.29,95%CI:0.94,1.79,I=0%)、严重并发症(OR:1.95,95%CI:0.88,4.29,I=38%)、出血并发症(OR:1.11,95%CI:0.71,1.73,I=0%)、输血需求(OR:1.10,95%CI:0.62,1.94,I=0%)和术后血栓形成事件(OR:1.30,95%CI:0.21,8.24,I=36%)均无统计学显著差异。

结论

围手术期继续使用阿司匹林可能不会增加PCNL不良结局的风险。然而,鉴于数据有限,需要进一步开展前瞻性多中心研究以提高证据质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d3/12302093/7a8c790a59b7/PJMS-41-2092-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d3/12302093/de13b20e967c/PJMS-41-2092-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d3/12302093/a09cdf098a98/PJMS-41-2092-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d3/12302093/fe436ed7d84e/PJMS-41-2092-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d3/12302093/7a8c790a59b7/PJMS-41-2092-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d3/12302093/de13b20e967c/PJMS-41-2092-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d3/12302093/a09cdf098a98/PJMS-41-2092-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d3/12302093/fe436ed7d84e/PJMS-41-2092-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d3/12302093/7a8c790a59b7/PJMS-41-2092-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The efficacy of continuing aspirin in the perioperative period during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮肾镜取石术围手术期持续使用阿司匹林的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):2092-2100. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.7.12240.
2
Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones.完全无管化经皮肾镜取石术、无管化经皮肾镜取石术和有管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD012607. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012607.pub2.
3
Tranexamic acid for percutaneous nephrolithotomy.氨甲环酸在经皮肾镜碎石术中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 26;10(10):CD015122. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015122.pub2.
4
Pathogen-reduced platelets for the prevention of bleeding.用于预防出血的去病原体血小板。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28(3):CD009072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009072.pub2.
5
Cell salvage for the management of postpartum haemorrhage.采用细胞回收技术管理产后出血。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 20;12(12):CD016120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016120.
6
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
7
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
8
Glutamine supplementation for critically ill adults.对危重症成年患者补充谷氨酰胺
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 9;2014(9):CD010050. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010050.pub2.
9
Pathogen-reduced platelets for the prevention of bleeding.用于预防出血的去病原体血小板。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 30;7(7):CD009072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009072.pub3.
10
Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia.产后缺铁性贫血女性的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 13;12(12):CD010861. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010861.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Stone clearance and complication rate of micro percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal stone: A randomized trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术治疗下极肾结石的结石清除率和并发症发生率:一项随机试验。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2023 Oct-Dec;35(Suppl 1)(4):S721-S725. doi: 10.55519/JAMC-S4-11807.
2
Is it Safe to Continue Aspirin in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?行经皮肾镜碎石取石术的患者继续服用阿司匹林安全吗?
Urology. 2024 Jan;183:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.09.022. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
3
The Safety and Efficacy of Bipolar Plasma-Kinetic Transurethral Resection of The Prostate in Patients Taking Low-Dose Aspirin.
低剂量阿司匹林治疗患者的双极等离子前列腺剜除术的安全性和有效性。
Urol J. 2023 Dec 26;20(6):419-423. doi: 10.22037/uj.v20i.7508.
4
Effects of Aspirin on Kidney Biopsy Bleeding Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021261005).阿司匹林对肾活检出血并发症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析(PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021261005)。
Kidney360. 2023 May 1;4(5):700-710. doi: 10.34067/KID.0000000000000091. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
5
The effects of continuing aspirin on blood loss and postoperative outcomes in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.持续服用阿司匹林对经皮肾镜取石术患者失血及术后结局的影响
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2023 Feb 25;11(1):50-58. eCollection 2023.
6
Safety of cholecystectomy in patients under antithrombotic Drugs: A systematic review and meta-analysis.抗血栓药物治疗患者行胆囊切除术的安全性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Nov-Dec;38(8):2365-2372. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.8.7032.
7
Effect of Body Mass Index on complications and success rates of percutaneous nephrolithotomy-A tertiary care hospital experience.体重指数对经皮肾镜取石术并发症及成功率的影响——一家三级医疗中心的经验
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Nov-Dec;38(8):2112-2117. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.8.3663.
8
A comparative study of ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and x-ray-guided percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the treatment of complex renal calculi without hydronephrosis.超声引导下经皮肾镜碎石术与X线引导下经皮肾镜碎石术治疗无肾积水复杂性肾结石的对比研究
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Nov-Dec;38(8):2259-2265. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.8.5904.
9
The Safety of Continuing Low-dose Aspirin Therapy Perioperatively in the Patients had Undergone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮肾镜碎石取石术后继续低剂量阿司匹林治疗的安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Urol J. 2022 Jun 26;19(4):253-261. doi: 10.22037/uj.v19i.7170.
10
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in new versus those patients with previous history of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy on ipsilateral side.新发患者与同侧有体外冲击波碎石术既往史患者的经皮肾镜取石术对比。
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Mar-Apr;38(4Part-II):833-837. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.4.5116.