Suppr超能文献

经皮肾镜取石术围手术期持续使用阿司匹林的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

The efficacy of continuing aspirin in the perioperative period during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Hua Lingling, Zhou Hui

机构信息

Lingling Hua, Operating Room, Third People's Hospital of Changxing County, Huzhou, Zhejiang Province 313103, P.R. China.

Hui Zhou, Department of Operating Room, Changxing County People's Hospital, Huzhou, Zhejiang Province 313100, P.R. China.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):2092-2100. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.7.12240.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The present study was conducted to assess the safety of continuing aspirin during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS

PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies up to 5 February 2025. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted for change in hemoglobin, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, need for transfusion and postoperative thrombotic events between patients continuing aspirin vs patients not on any antithrombotic therapy in the perioperative period (controls).

RESULTS

Six studies were included. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in change in hemoglobin levels (MD: -0.03 95% CI: -0.24, 0.18 I=31%), estimated blood loss (MD: -6.91 95% CI: -14.36, 0.54 I=0%), length of hospital stay (MD: -0.31 95% CI: -0.99, 0.37 I=94%), all complications (OR: 1.29 95% CI: 0.94, 1.79 I=0%), serious complications (OR: 1.95 95% CI: 0.88, 4.29 I=38%), bleeding complications (OR: 1.11 95% CI: 0.71, 1.73 I=0%), need for transfusion (OR: 1.10 95% CI: 0.62, 1.94 I=0%), and postoperative thrombotic events (OR: 1.30 95% CI: 0.21, 8.24 I=36%) between patients continuing aspirin and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuing aspirin during the perioperative period may not increase the risk of adverse outcomes of PCNL. However, given the scarce data further prospective and Multi-Centre studies are needed to improve the quality of evidence.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)期间继续使用阿司匹林的安全性。

方法

检索了截至2025年2月5日的PubMed、CENTRAL、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science等数据库中的相关研究。对围手术期继续使用阿司匹林的患者与未接受任何抗血栓治疗的患者(对照组)之间血红蛋白变化、失血量、住院时间、并发症、输血需求和术后血栓形成事件进行随机效应荟萃分析。

结果

纳入六项研究。荟萃分析显示,继续使用阿司匹林的患者与对照组相比,血红蛋白水平变化(MD:-0.03,95%CI:-0.24,0.18,I=31%)、估计失血量(MD:-6.91,95%CI:-14.36,0.54,I=0%)、住院时间(MD:-0.31,95%CI:-0.99,0.37,I=94%)、所有并发症(OR:1.29,95%CI:0.94,1.79,I=0%)、严重并发症(OR:1.95,95%CI:0.88,4.29,I=38%)、出血并发症(OR:1.11,95%CI:0.71,1.73,I=0%)、输血需求(OR:1.10,95%CI:0.62,1.94,I=0%)和术后血栓形成事件(OR:1.30,95%CI:0.21,8.24,I=36%)均无统计学显著差异。

结论

围手术期继续使用阿司匹林可能不会增加PCNL不良结局的风险。然而,鉴于数据有限,需要进一步开展前瞻性多中心研究以提高证据质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d3/12302093/de13b20e967c/PJMS-41-2092-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验