• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新发患者与同侧有体外冲击波碎石术既往史患者的经皮肾镜取石术对比。

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in new versus those patients with previous history of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy on ipsilateral side.

作者信息

Iqbal Nadeem, Iqbal Sajid, Zareen Nasir, Blair Keron Akintola Ayodele

机构信息

Nadeem Iqbal, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Sajid Iqbal, Department of Rehabilitation, Pakistan Navy PNS Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Mar-Apr;38(4Part-II):833-837. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.4.5116.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.38.4.5116
PMID:35634635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9121975/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To appraise the effects of previous history of ineffectual extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) treatment on the execution and end result of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

METHODS

The study was performed from January 2012 till November 2019 at the urology department at our hospital, a tertiary healthcare center. In total, four hundred and twenty two patients were enrolled in the study. We arranged the study participants into two groups. Group-I comprised of 66 subjects who had undergone failed SWL 12 months prior to PCNL procedure, while Group-II included patients who had no history of previous SWL. Information related to study variables was registered in designated proformas and then processed in SPSS version 16 for the statistical computations.

RESULTS

On the whole, the mean age of patients was 45.25± 14.38 years. While the mean calculus size was 494.80±128.83 mm. The complexity of stones formulated on the basis of Guy's stone score was identical among the two groups. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class categories were almost similar among the two groups. Stone free rates of 80.30% and 81.74% (p value=0.73) were observed in Group-I and II respectively. Time to create PCNL tract and mean drop in hemoglobin were noted to be significantly higher in Group-I. Complication rates and grades were not being dissimilar among the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients having prior history of unsuccessful SWL history before undertaking the PCNL procedure manifested similar stone free rates and complications rates as those observed in SWL naive cases of PCNL.

摘要

目的

评估既往体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)治疗无效的病史对经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)实施过程及最终结果的影响。

方法

本研究于2012年1月至2019年11月在我院泌尿外科进行,我院为三级医疗中心。总共422例患者纳入研究。我们将研究参与者分为两组。第一组由66名在PCNL手术前12个月SWL治疗失败的受试者组成,而第二组包括既往无SWL病史的患者。与研究变量相关的信息记录在指定的表格中,然后在SPSS 16版中进行处理以进行统计计算。

结果

总体而言,患者的平均年龄为45.25±14.38岁。结石平均大小为494.80±128.83 mm。根据盖伊结石评分制定的结石复杂性在两组中相同。两组间美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级类别几乎相似。第一组和第二组的结石清除率分别为80.30%和81.74%(p值=0.73)。第一组建立PCNL通道的时间和血红蛋白平均下降幅度明显更高。两组间并发症发生率和分级并无差异。

结论

在进行PCNL手术前有SWL治疗失败病史的患者,其结石清除率和并发症发生率与PCNL初治患者相似。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in new versus those patients with previous history of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy on ipsilateral side.新发患者与同侧有体外冲击波碎石术既往史患者的经皮肾镜取石术对比。
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Mar-Apr;38(4Part-II):833-837. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.4.5116.
2
Effect of previous open renal surgery and failed extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy on the performance and outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.既往开放性肾脏手术及体外冲击波碎石失败对经皮肾镜取石术操作及预后的影响。
J Endourol. 2010 Jan;24(1):13-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0291.
3
Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较冲击波碎石术、经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术治疗肾结石的无石率:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 21;14(2):e0211316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211316. eCollection 2019.
4
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus shock wave lithotripsy for high-density moderate-sized renal stones: A prospective randomized study.经皮肾镜取石术与冲击波碎石术治疗高密度中等大小肾结石的前瞻性随机研究
Urol Ann. 2019 Oct-Dec;11(4):426-431. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_63_19.
5
Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review.体外冲击波碎石术、经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术治疗小儿上尿路结石的最佳治疗方法:系统评价。
BMC Urol. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0520-2.
6
Comparative study between ultra-mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus stented extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of renal stones in Egypt.埃及超微经皮肾镜取石术与置入支架体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的对比研究
Arab J Urol. 2023 May 16;21(4):273-279. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2023.2211897. eCollection 2023.
7
Primary SWL Is an Efficient and Cost-Effective Treatment for Lower Pole Renal Stones Between 10 and 20 mm in Size: A Large Single Center Study.首次体外冲击波碎石术是治疗直径10至20毫米的下极肾结石的一种有效且具有成本效益的方法:一项大型单中心研究。
J Endourol. 2017 May;31(5):510-516. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0825. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
8
High burden stones: the role of SWL.高负荷结石:体外冲击波碎石术的作用
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2010 Mar;82(1):43-4.
9
How practical is the application of percutaneous nephrolithotomy scoring systems? Prospective study comparing Guy's Stone Score, S.T.O.N.E. score and the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) nomogram.经皮肾镜取石术评分系统的应用有多实用?比较盖伊结石评分、S.T.O.N.E.评分和腔内泌尿外科临床研究办公室(CROES)列线图的前瞻性研究。
Arab J Urol. 2017 Jan 12;15(1):7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.11.005. eCollection 2017 Mar.
10
Cost-effectiveness of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, Standard and Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, and Shock Wave Lithotripsy for the Management of 1-2cm Renal Stones.逆行性肾内手术、标准及迷你经皮肾镜取石术以及冲击波碎石术治疗1-2厘米肾结石的成本效益分析
Urology. 2021 Oct;156:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.030. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of continuing aspirin in the perioperative period during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮肾镜取石术围手术期持续使用阿司匹林的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pak J Med Sci. 2025 Jul;41(7):2092-2100. doi: 10.12669/pjms.41.7.12240.
2
predictive model of nosocomial infection in patients with upper urinary tract stones after flexible ureterorenoscopy with laser lithotripsy: A retrospective study.输尿管软镜激光碎石术后上尿路结石患者医院感染的预测模型:一项回顾性研究
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Jan-Feb;40(3Part-II):394-398. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.3.8855.

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative Indices Predicting Fever Following Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术后发热的围手术期预测指标。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020 Dec;30(12):1306-1311. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2020.12.1306.
2
Outcome Of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy In Preschool And School-Age Children-Single Center Experience.学龄前和学龄儿童经皮肾镜取石术的结果——单中心经验
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2019 Jul-Sep;31(3):391-396.
3
Evaluation of Renal Stone Comminution and Injury by Burst Wave Lithotripsy in a Pig Model.猪模型中利用冲击波碎石术粉碎肾结石及损伤的评估。
J Endourol. 2019 Oct;33(10):787-792. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0886. Epub 2019 May 27.
4
Effects of visual standard channel combined with visual superfine precision puncture channel or super-mini channel percutaneous nephrolithotomy on multiple renal calculi.可视标准通道联合可视超微精准穿刺通道或超微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗多发肾结石的疗效
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 May-Jun;34(3):535-539. doi: 10.12669/pjms.343.14567.
5
Effects of previous unsuccessful extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment on the performance and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.既往体外冲击波碎石治疗失败对经皮肾镜取石术操作及预后的影响。
Arab J Urol. 2017 Apr 7;15(2):94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.01.009. eCollection 2017 Jun.
6
Detection and Evaluation of Renal Injury in Burst Wave Lithotripsy Using Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.使用超声和磁共振成像检测与评估冲击波碎石术中的肾损伤
J Endourol. 2017 Aug;31(8):786-792. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0202. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
7
Development of a novel magnetic resonance imaging acquisition and analysis workflow for the quantification of shock wave lithotripsy-induced renal hemorrhagic injury.开发一种新型磁共振成像采集和分析工作流程,用于定量评估冲击波碎石术引起的肾出血性损伤。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Oct;45(5):507-513. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0959-5. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
8
Does lithotripsy increase stone recurrence? A comparative study between extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and non-fragmenting percutaneous nephrolithotomy.体外冲击波碎石术会增加结石复发率吗?体外冲击波碎石术与非粉碎性经皮肾镜取石术的对比研究。
Arab J Urol. 2016 Apr 3;14(2):108-14. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2016.02.004. eCollection 2016 Jun.
9
Clinical comparison of the efficiency and security of balloon dilators versus fascial dilators in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL).经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中球囊扩张器与筋膜扩张器效率及安全性的临床比较
Pak J Med Sci. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):635-40. doi: 10.12669/pjms.323.9281.
10
Outcome and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary versus secondary procedure for renal calculi.经皮肾镜取石术作为肾结石一期与二期手术的结果及并发症
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Mar-Apr;42(2):262-9. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0619.