Suppr超能文献

活动性多发性硬化症中不同CD20抗体侧向转换后的疾病转归

Disease outcomes following lateral switch among different CD20-antibodies in active multiple sclerosis.

作者信息

Axhausen Franziska, Mrochen Anne, Winter Pia, Baumgart Romy, Mühlenbrock Pauline, Mück Anna, Wolff Stephanie, Meuth Sven G, Möllenhoff Kathrin, Pfeuffer Steffen

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Mult Scler. 2025 Aug;31(9):1110-1120. doi: 10.1177/13524585251361330. Epub 2025 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ocrelizumab (OCR) and ofatumumab (OFA)are approved and their differences in dosing route and interval allow personalized treatment. However, there are no data on whether lateral switches between both substances affect treatment effectiveness or safety.

METHODS

We screened our local cohort of MS patients, who began OCR since 09/2020 or OFA since 09/2021. Patients with a lateral switch were matched to controls who continuously received initial B-cell depleting therapy (BCT). We compared disease courses including effectiveness outcomes as well as peripheral CD19+ B-cell counts and serum IgG levels.

RESULTS

From 09/2020 to 03/2024, 713 patients were subjected to BCT (OCR: 396; OFA: 317 [as in Fig.1]). The matched OCR cohort included 38 switchers and 149 controls. The OFA cohort consisted of 24 switchers and 83 controls. Effectiveness outcomes were comparable among switchers and controls. B cell depletion appeared slightly pronounced following a switch. Serum IgG levels declined faster among switchers compared to controls (OCR: 9.7 vs 9.0 g/L; = ; manifest hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) in 13.2% vs 6.0%; OFA: 9.7 vs 8.4 g/L; = ; manifest HGG in 8.3% vs 2.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral switching between BCT does not abate effectiveness in this matched real-world cohort. Our observation of increased loss of IgG warrants further validation, but may indicate niche-specific immunological effects of OFA and OCR.

摘要

背景

奥瑞珠单抗(OCR)和奥法妥木单抗(OFA)已获批准,它们在给药途径和间隔上的差异允许进行个性化治疗。然而,关于这两种药物之间的横向转换是否会影响治疗效果或安全性,尚无相关数据。

方法

我们筛选了本地的多发性硬化症(MS)患者队列,这些患者自2020年9月起开始使用OCR或自2021年9月起开始使用OFA。横向转换的患者与持续接受初始B细胞清除疗法(BCT)的对照组进行匹配。我们比较了疾病进程,包括疗效结果以及外周血CD19 + B细胞计数和血清IgG水平。

结果

从2020年9月到2024年3月,713例患者接受了BCT(OCR:396例;OFA:317例[如图1所示])。匹配的OCR队列包括38例转换者和149例对照组。OFA队列由24例转换者和83例对照组组成。转换者和对照组之间的疗效结果相当。转换后B细胞清除似乎略有明显。与对照组相比,转换者的血清IgG水平下降更快(OCR:9.7 vs 9.0 g/L;P = ;明显低丙种球蛋白血症(HGG)发生率为13.2% vs 6.0%;OFA:9.7 vs 8.4 g/L;P = ;明显HGG发生率为8.3% vs 2.4%)。

结论

在这个匹配的真实世界队列中,BCT之间的横向转换不会降低疗效。我们观察到IgG损失增加值得进一步验证,但可能表明OFA和OCR具有特定的免疫效应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0040/12357975/8e251052f2f8/10.1177_13524585251361330-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验