Yu Wenxin, Luo Zhongling, Zhao Yi, Hu Zhiqi, Zhang Aijun, Li Yong, Tao Juan, Chen Xiaosong, Wang Haiying, Chen Liying, Zhu Hanjie, Lin Xiaoxi
Department of Laser and Aesthetic Medicine, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Dermatology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Aug;24(8):e70358. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70358.
As a potentially effective anesthetic, CU-30101 is comprised of 7% lidocaine and 7% tetracaine and is a generic drug of Pliaglis. This study aimed to investigate the equivalence between CU-30101 and Pliaglis as topical anesthetics for fractional laser.
This Phase 3 trial recruited Chinese adults scheduled for facial fractional laser resurfacing. Participants were randomized to receive opposite treatment sequences of CU-30101 and Pliaglis on contralateral sides of the face prior to laser application. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), participant and investigator satisfaction ratings, local tolerability, and safety were assessed.
Two hundred eighty-four participants completed the study, with mean VAS scores of 35.3 ± 24.51 for CU-30101 and 37.3 ± 24.17 for Pliaglis. The 95% confidence interval of -3.78 to -0.13 for the VAS difference laid within the predefined equivalence margin of ±4.7, confirming equivalence in efficacy. The results in the per-protocol set further corroborated the equivalence. Both participants and investigators expressed consistently high satisfaction with CU-30101 and Pliaglis. Furthermore, both treatments were well tolerated and exhibited favorable safety profiles.
This study demonstrated the equivalent efficacy of CU-30101 to its reference product, Pliaglis, among Chinese adults undergoing facial fractional laser resurfacing. CU-30101 showed commendable local tolerability and safety profiles, consistent with those of Pliaglis.
CU - 30101作为一种潜在有效的麻醉剂,由7%的利多卡因和7%的丁卡因组成,是Pliaglis的仿制药。本研究旨在探讨CU - 30101与Pliaglis作为面部激光换肤术局部麻醉剂的等效性。
这项3期试验招募了计划接受面部激光换肤术的中国成年人。在激光治疗前,参与者被随机分配在面部的对侧接受CU - 30101和Pliaglis的相反治疗顺序。评估视觉模拟量表(VAS)、参与者和研究者的满意度评分、局部耐受性和安全性。
284名参与者完成了研究,CU - 30101组的平均VAS评分为35.3±24.51,Pliaglis组为37.3±24.17。VAS差异的95%置信区间为 - 3.78至 - 0.13,在预先定义的±4.7等效范围内,证实了疗效的等效性。符合方案集的结果进一步证实了等效性。参与者和研究者对CU - 30101和Pliaglis均表现出持续的高度满意度。此外,两种治疗的耐受性均良好,且安全性良好。
本研究证明了在接受面部激光换肤术的中国成年人中,CU - 30101与其参比产品Pliaglis具有等效疗效。CU - 30101显示出值得称赞的局部耐受性和安全性,与Pliaglis一致。