• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
It's a good idea, but are they willing? Assessing pharmacist willingness to deliver colorectal cancer screening.这是个好主意,但他们愿意吗?评估药剂师开展结直肠癌筛查的意愿。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0275.
2
Primary care provider perspectives on the role of community pharmacy in colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study.基层医疗服务提供者对社区药房在结直肠癌筛查中作用的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):892. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09828-3.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Colorectal cancer screening knowledge among community pharmacists: A national survey.社区药剂师的结直肠癌筛查知识:一项全国性调查。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2025 Jan-Feb;65(1):102130. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.102130. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
Public preferences for health and non-health outcomes of Universal Basic Income and alternative income-based policies: A mixed-method feasibility study.公众对普遍基本收入和其他基于收入的政策的健康与非健康结果的偏好:一项混合方法可行性研究。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul 30:1-26. doi: 10.3310/ALDS8846.
6
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
7
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.

本文引用的文献

1
How pharmacists would design and implement a community pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program.药剂师将如何设计并实施一项基于社区药房的结直肠癌筛查项目。
Prev Oncol Epidemiol. 2024;2(1). doi: 10.1080/28322134.2024.2332264.
2
Colorectal cancer screening knowledge among community pharmacists: A national survey.社区药剂师的结直肠癌筛查知识:一项全国性调查。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2025 Jan-Feb;65(1):102130. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2024.102130. Epub 2024 May 23.
3
Impact of Primary Care Providers and Health Insurance Type on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the United States.初级保健提供者和医疗保险类型对美国结直肠癌筛查的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 1;119(10):2134-2137. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002809. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
4
Patient Willingness to Use a Pharmacy-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Service: A National Survey of U.S. Adults.美国成年人基于药房的结直肠癌筛查服务使用意愿的全国性调查。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Jan 9;33(1):63-71. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0763.
5
Patient perspectives on a proposed pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program.患者对拟议的基于药房的结直肠癌筛查计划的看法。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Dec 15;13(12):909-918. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad057.
6
Primary care provider perspectives on the role of community pharmacy in colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study.基层医疗服务提供者对社区药房在结直肠癌筛查中作用的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):892. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09828-3.
7
Revisiting the continuum of pharmacist prescriptive authority.重新审视药剂师处方权的连续统一体。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2023 Sep-Oct;63(5):1508-1514. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2023.06.025. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
8
Patient and provider factors associated with colorectal cancer screening among average risk health plan enrollees in the US, 2015-2018.2015-2018 年美国一般风险健康计划参保者中与结直肠癌筛查相关的患者和提供者因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 May 26;23(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09474-9.
9
Reach and effectiveness of a centralized navigation program for patients with positive fecal immunochemical tests requiring follow-up colonoscopy.针对粪便免疫化学检测呈阳性且需要后续结肠镜检查的患者的集中式导航计划的覆盖范围和有效性。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Apr 17;34:102211. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102211. eCollection 2023 Aug.
10
Facilitators and Barriers to Care Coordination Between Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations and Community Partners: Early Lessons From Massachusetts.医疗补助管理式医疗组织与社区合作伙伴间的医疗协调的促进因素和障碍:来自马萨诸塞州的早期经验教训。
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Oct;80(5):507-518. doi: 10.1177/10775587231168010. Epub 2023 Apr 26.

这是个好主意,但他们愿意吗?评估药剂师开展结直肠癌筛查的意愿。

It's a good idea, but are they willing? Assessing pharmacist willingness to deliver colorectal cancer screening.

作者信息

Brenner Alison T, Odebunmi Olufeyisayo O, Waters Austin R, Wangen Mary, Marciniak Macary W, Ferrari Renée M, Wheeler Stephanie B, Shah Parth D

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Carrboro, NORTH CAROLINA, United States.

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, UT, United States.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0275.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0275
PMID:40736449
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12414247/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accessibility, expanding scope of practice, and a rapidly changing policy landscape make US community pharmacies a promising delivery setting for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. It is not clear, however, whether community pharmacists are willing to incorporate CRC screening into their pharmacy practice, what potential drivers of willingness are, and, if unwilling, under what conditions pharmacists would be willing to provide PharmFIT™.

METHODS

From September 2022 to January 2023, we surveyed 578 currently practicing community pharmacists. We assessed willingness to provide a pharmacy-based CRC screening program (PharmFIT™). We used multiple linear regression to identify correlates of perceived implementation complexity and multiple logistic regression to explore overall willingness to implement PharmFIT™ Results: Most pharmacists (80%) were willing to implement PharmFIT™. The most common reasons for unwillingness were that results needed to be reported to the patients' PCPs (52%), that appropriate training in delivering CRC screening be provided (48%) and that care coordination with PCPs be clear (46%). Perceived complexity of the intervention decreased as years in practice increased (β= 0.013; CI95%: 0.01-0.02) and as level of knowledge about CRC screening increased (β= 0.085; CI95%: 0.01-0.16). Respondents' willingness to implement PharmFIT™ increased as perceived complexity decreased (OR:5.68, CI95%: 3.96-8.15).

CONCLUSIONS

Most community pharmacists in the US would be willing to integrate PharmFIT™ into their current workflows. Training in how to deliver FIT and preparation for the coordination of test results and follow up care should be completed prior to implementing PharmFIT™.

IMPACT

Community pharmacies are a viable venue for delivering CRC screening.

摘要

背景

可及性、不断扩大的执业范围以及迅速变化的政策环境,使美国社区药房成为结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的一个有前景的服务场所。然而,尚不清楚社区药剂师是否愿意将CRC筛查纳入其药房业务,愿意的潜在驱动因素是什么,以及如果不愿意,在何种情况下药剂师会愿意提供“药物适配性检测(PharmFIT™)”。

方法

2022年9月至2023年1月,我们对578名在职社区药剂师进行了调查。我们评估了提供基于药房的CRC筛查项目(PharmFIT™)的意愿。我们使用多元线性回归来确定感知到的实施复杂性的相关因素,并使用多元逻辑回归来探索实施PharmFIT™的总体意愿。结果:大多数药剂师(80%)愿意实施PharmFIT™。不愿意的最常见原因是结果需要报告给患者的初级保健医生(PCP)(52%)、需要提供CRC筛查的适当培训(48%)以及与PCP的护理协调要明确(46%)。随着执业年限的增加(β = 0.013;95%置信区间:0.01 - 0.02)以及对CRC筛查知识水平的提高(β = 0.085;95%置信区间:0.01 - 0.16),干预的感知复杂性降低。随着感知复杂性的降低,受访者实施PharmFIT™的意愿增加(比值比:5.68,95%置信区间:3.96 - 8.15)。

结论

美国大多数社区药剂师愿意将PharmFIT™整合到他们当前的工作流程中。在实施PharmFIT™之前,应完成关于如何进行粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)的培训以及检测结果协调和后续护理准备。

影响

社区药房是提供CRC筛查的可行场所。