Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Gillings School of Global Public Health, Maternal and Child Health Department, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Dec 15;13(12):909-918. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad057.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common and preventable cancer. CRC screening is underutilized, particularly within medically underserved communities. Most interventions aimed at increasing CRC screening are delivered through primary care clinics. Pharmacies are more accessible than traditional primary care settings and may be ideally suited for delivering CRC screening and increasing access. Fecal immunochemical test is an at-home, stool-based CRC screening test that could be distributed through pharmacies. The purpose of our study was to assess patient perspectives on receiving fecal immunochemical test-based CRC screening through pharmacies. We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants residing in North Carolina and Washington. Interviews explored acceptability and intervention design preferences for a pharmacy-based CRC screening program. The interview guide was informed by Andersen's Healthcare Utilization Model and the Theoretical Domains Framework. Interviews were conducted at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, audio-recorded, and transcribed. Patients perceived a pharmacy-based CRC screening program to be highly acceptable, citing factors such as ease of pharmacy access and avoiding co-pays for an office visit. Some concerns about privacy and coordination with patients' primary care provider tempered acceptability. Trust and positive relationships with providers and pharmacists as well as seamless care across the CRC screening continuum also were viewed as important. Patients viewed pharmacy-based CRC screening as an acceptable option for CRC screening. To improve programmatic success, it will be important to ensure privacy, determine how communication between the pharmacy and the patient's provider will take place, and establish closed-loop care, particularly for patients with abnormal results.
结直肠癌(CRC)是一种常见且可预防的癌症。结直肠癌筛查的利用率较低,特别是在医疗资源不足的社区。大多数旨在提高结直肠癌筛查率的干预措施都是通过初级保健诊所实施的。与传统的初级保健环境相比,药店更容易到达,可能非常适合提供结直肠癌筛查并增加获得途径。粪便免疫化学试验是一种基于粪便的家用结直肠癌筛查试验,可通过药店分发。我们研究的目的是评估患者对通过药店接受粪便免疫化学试验结直肠癌筛查的看法。我们对居住在北卡罗来纳州和华盛顿州的参与者进行了半结构化访谈。访谈探讨了对基于药店的结直肠癌筛查计划的可接受性和干预设计偏好。访谈指南以安德森医疗保健利用模型和理论领域框架为依据。访谈在北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校和弗雷德哈钦森癌症研究中心进行,录音并转录。患者认为基于药店的 CRC 筛查计划非常容易接受,他们提到了药店易于访问以及避免为就诊支付共付额等因素。一些人对隐私和与患者初级保健提供者的协调表示担忧,这降低了接受程度。患者还认为与提供者和药剂师的信任和积极关系以及 CRC 筛查连续体的无缝护理也很重要。患者认为基于药店的 CRC 筛查是 CRC 筛查的一个可接受的选择。为了提高计划的成功率,必须确保隐私,确定药店与患者提供者之间的沟通方式,并建立闭环护理,特别是对于检查结果异常的患者。