Dong Gaiying, Wu Tingting, Gu Xiaofan, Feng Yuyi, Wu Liangliang, Hu Zhiwen
Department of Medical Ultrasound, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Anhui Public Health Clinical Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui University North District, Hefei, Anhui, China.
J Diabetes Investig. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1111/jdi.70130.
Evidence suggests that the Endothelial Activation and Stress Index (EASIX) predicts mortality in endothelium-related conditions, but its link to mortality risk in diabetes remains unclear. This study investigates the association between EASIX and mortality risk in diabetes patients.
We included 3,252 diabetes patients from seven National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles (2003-2016). Mortality data were sourced from National Death Index records. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) regression assessed the EASIX-mortality risk relationship, while the maximally selected rank statistics method (MSRSM) identified the optimal EASIX cutoff for survival outcomes. Weighted multivariable Cox regression models evaluated the association of EASIX with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.
Over a median follow-up of 91 months, 895 (27.5%) of 3,252 diabetes patients died, including 260 (8.0%) from cardiovascular and 635 (19.5%) from noncardiovascular causes. RCS analysis showed a positive association between EASIX and both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Each one-unit EASIX increase raised all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risks by 27% and 24%, respectively. MSRSM classified patients into higher (>0.70) and lower (≤0.70) EASIX groups. Those with higher EASIX had a significantly greater risk of all-cause (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.21-2.01) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.33-3.16). Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic analysis showed AUCs for 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survival were 0.78, 0.72, 0.70, and 0.69 (all-cause) and 0.90, 0.81, 0.76, and 0.73 (cardiovascular).
Elevated EASIX is independently associated with increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in diabetes patients, highlighting its potential as a valuable clinical biomarker.
有证据表明,内皮激活与应激指数(EASIX)可预测内皮相关疾病的死亡率,但其与糖尿病患者死亡风险的关联仍不明确。本研究调查了EASIX与糖尿病患者死亡风险之间的关联。
我们纳入了来自七次国家健康与营养检查调查周期(2003 - 2016年)的3252名糖尿病患者。死亡数据来源于国家死亡指数记录。受限立方样条(RCS)回归评估了EASIX与死亡风险的关系,而最大选择秩统计方法(MSRSM)确定了生存结局的最佳EASIX临界值。加权多变量Cox回归模型评估了EASIX与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率的关联。
在91个月的中位随访期内,3252名糖尿病患者中有895人(27.5%)死亡,其中260人(8.0%)死于心血管疾病,635人(19.5%)死于非心血管疾病。RCS分析显示EASIX与全因死亡率和心血管死亡率均呈正相关。EASIX每增加一个单位,全因死亡率和心血管死亡率风险分别升高27%和24%。MSRSM将患者分为EASIX较高(>0.70)和较低(≤0.70)两组。EASIX较高的患者全因死亡风险(HR 1.56,95%CI 1.21 - 2.01)和心血管死亡风险(HR 2.05,95%CI 1.33 - 3.16)显著更高。时间依赖性受试者工作特征分析显示,1年、3年、5年和10年生存的AUC分别为0.78、0.72、0.70和0.69(全因)以及0.90、0.81、0.76和0.73(心血管)。
EASIX升高与糖尿病患者全因死亡率和心血管死亡率增加独立相关,突出了其作为有价值临床生物标志物的潜力。