Suppr超能文献

给参考血清赋予准确值的方法。第2部分。权威方法、参考实验室、传递值和共识值的使用。

Methods of assigning accurate values to reference serum. Part 2. The use of definitive methods, reference laboratories, transferred values and consensus values.

作者信息

Eldjarn L, Broughton P M

出版信息

Ann Clin Biochem. 1985 Nov;22 ( Pt 6):635-49. doi: 10.1177/000456328502200614.

Abstract

Eight analytes (Ca, Cl, cholesterol, glucose, Mg, K, Na and urate) have been determined in one horse serum masterlot by up to six different procedures: (i) by so-called definitive methods; (ii) by a group of reference laboratories using a variety of analytical methods; (iii) using the results of two independent external quality assessment schemes; (iv) by transferring values from a human serum standard reference material analysed by definitive methods; (v) by similar transfer of values from several batches of horse reference serum previously analysed by definitive methods; and (vi) as in (v) but using a group of reference laboratories. The results have confirmed the validity and usefulness of the transfer process in value assignment and in identifying outliers due to inaccurate methods. Definitive methods are shown to be subject to error, and although they appear to be the most accurate single techniques currently available, they are not definitive in the sense of being without bias and having no known source of inaccuracy.

摘要

在一批马血清标准品中,通过多达六种不同的方法测定了八种分析物(钙、氯、胆固醇、葡萄糖、镁、钾、钠和尿酸盐):(i)采用所谓的权威方法;(ii)由一组参考实验室使用多种分析方法;(iii)利用两个独立的外部质量评估计划的结果;(iv)通过从用权威方法分析的人血清标准参考物质转移值;(v)通过从先前用权威方法分析的几批马参考血清类似地转移值;以及(vi)与(v)相同,但使用一组参考实验室。结果证实了转移过程在赋值和识别因方法不准确而产生的异常值方面的有效性和实用性。权威方法被证明存在误差,尽管它们似乎是目前可用的最准确的单一技术,但从无偏差且无已知不准确来源的意义上来说,它们并非绝对准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验