Taylor S, Dunn L, Udeh-Momoh C, Abbott K, Giannakopoulou P, Middleton L, Robinson O, Kalsi J, Kafetsouli D, Ford J
Ageing Epidemiology (AGE) Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
School of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):563. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06158-3.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) remains a global health and socioeconomic burden. Telemedicine has been more widely used since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and may be an effective strategy to mitigate the rising costs associated with AD. This study aimed to assess technology readiness among older adults at risk of developing dementia, with the goal of informing the design and delivery of technology-based approaches in AD prevention research.
Cognitively unaffected older adults (n = 226) from the CHARIOT PRO Substudy were invited to complete the CHARIOT Technology Questionnaire (CTQ). CTQ assessed technology experiences and attitudes, including 'technology readiness' via the Technology Readiness Index (TRI).
Female participants scored, on average, lower TRI (M = 27.50, SD = 6.87) compared to males (M = 29.50, SD = 6.02). Furthermore, age predicted levels of technology readiness. Exploratory factor analysis determined two factors: "Technology Competence" (Factor 1) and "Technology Trepidation" (Factor 2). Gender differences were found for "Technology Competence" (but not "Technology Trepidation"), and age predicted "Technology Trepidation" (but not "Technology Competence").
Differences in gender, age, "Technology Competence", and "Technology Trepidation" may highlight those who need additional study and/or support in remote-based AD dementia prevention trials.
COVID-19 has accelerated our adoption of 'digitalisation' in AD dementia research. A deeper understanding of the barriers to technology readiness may help inform future AD research studies.
The CHARIOT PRO SubStudy is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02114372).
阿尔茨海默病(AD)仍然是一项全球性的健康和社会经济负担。自新冠疫情开始以来,远程医疗得到了更广泛的应用,它可能是减轻与AD相关的不断上升的成本的有效策略。本研究旨在评估有患痴呆症风险的老年人的技术准备情况,目的是为AD预防研究中基于技术的方法的设计和实施提供信息。
邀请来自CHARIOT PRO子研究的认知未受影响的老年人(n = 226)完成CHARIOT技术问卷(CTQ)。CTQ评估技术体验和态度,包括通过技术准备指数(TRI)评估“技术准备情况”。
与男性(M = 29.50,标准差 = 6.02)相比,女性参与者的TRI平均得分较低(M = 27.50,标准差 = 6.87)。此外,年龄可预测技术准备水平。探索性因素分析确定了两个因素:“技术能力”(因素1)和“技术恐惧”(因素2)。在“技术能力”方面发现了性别差异(但“技术恐惧”方面没有),年龄可预测“技术恐惧”(但不能预测“技术能力”)。
性别、年龄、“技术能力”和“技术恐惧”方面的差异可能凸显了那些在基于远程的AD痴呆症预防试验中需要额外研究和/或支持的人群。
新冠疫情加速了我们在AD痴呆症研究中采用“数字化”。对技术准备障碍的更深入理解可能有助于为未来的AD研究提供信息。
CHARIOT PRO子研究已在clinicaltrials.gov(NCT02114372)注册。