Uzawa Tasuku, Ono Yuko, Sugiyama Jun, Takayama Kazushi, Nakanishi Nobuto, Kakamu Takeyasu, Ishida Tokiya, Tomita Nozomi, Shinohara Kazuaki, Kotani Joji
Department of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.
Department of Anesthesiology, Ohta General Hospital Foundation, Ohta Nishinouchi Hospital, Koriyama, Japan.
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01302-z.
Road traffic accidents are a major healthcare concern worldwide. To improve outcomes for patients injured in motor vehicle crashes, it is crucial to understand the factors associated with mortality and anatomically specific injury severity. Seat position is one of the possible determinants of road traffic injury fatality; however, evidence regarding which seat positions are linked to impaired survival outcomes and anatomically severe injuries remains scarce.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients injured in four-wheeled vehicle accidents between 2000 and 2022 and admitted to a community teaching hospital in Japan. Seat position was classified as driver seat, front passenger seat, or rear passenger seat. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Other outcomes included severe trauma, defined as an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of > 15, and anatomically specific severe injuries of the head and neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, and extremities, defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of ≥ 3.
Among 5,906 eligible patients, 4,104 (69.5%) were driver seat occupants, 1,009 (17.1%) were front passenger seat occupants, and 793 (13.4%) were rear passenger seat occupants. After adjusting for potential confounders such as age, sex, admission year, season, presentation time, presentation day, prehospital length of stay, vehicle configuration, collision type, seatbelt use, airbag deployment, and involvement in high-energy trauma using logistic regression analysis, rear passenger seat occupants had a lower risk of hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.396; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.216-0.727) and a lower risk of severe trauma with an ISS of > 15 (AOR, 0.428; 95% CI, 0.308-0.596) than driver seat occupants. Additionally, rear seat occupants were less likely to sustain serious injuries to the chest (AOR, 0.474; 95% CI, 0.333-0.673) and abdominal or pelvic contents (AOR, 0.373; 95% CI, 0.218-0.639) than driver seat occupants.
Our results suggest that driver seat occupants require special attention because of their higher risk of adverse outcomes and anatomically severe injuries. These findings will be useful for vehicle occupants, emergency medical professionals, and automobile manufacturers.
Not applicable.
道路交通事故是全球主要的医疗保健问题。为改善机动车碰撞事故中受伤患者的治疗效果,了解与死亡率和特定解剖部位损伤严重程度相关的因素至关重要。座位位置是道路交通伤害死亡的可能决定因素之一;然而,关于哪些座位位置与生存结果受损和解剖学上的严重损伤相关的证据仍然很少。
我们对2000年至2022年间在四轮车辆事故中受伤并入住日本一家社区教学医院的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。座位位置分为驾驶员座位、前排乘客座位或后排乘客座位。主要终点是院内死亡率。其他结果包括严重创伤,定义为损伤严重程度评分(ISS)>15,以及头部和颈部、胸部、腹部、骨盆和四肢的特定解剖部位严重损伤,定义为简明损伤量表评分≥3。
在5906名符合条件的患者中,4104名(69.5%)是驾驶员座位乘客,1009名(17.1%)是前排乘客座位乘客,793名(13.4%)是后排乘客座位乘客。在使用逻辑回归分析调整了年龄、性别、入院年份、季节、就诊时间、就诊日期、院前住院时间、车辆配置、碰撞类型、安全带使用、安全气囊展开以及是否参与高能创伤等潜在混杂因素后,后排乘客座位乘客的院内死亡风险较低(调整后的优势比[AOR],0.396;95%置信区间[CI],0.216 - 0.727),且ISS>15的严重创伤风险较低(AOR,0.428;95%CI,0.308 - 0.596),低于驾驶员座位乘客。此外,后排座位乘客胸部严重受伤的可能性低于驾驶员座位乘客(AOR,0.474;95%CI,0.333 - 0.673),腹部或盆腔脏器严重受伤的可能性也低于驾驶员座位乘客(AOR,0.373;95%CI,0.218 - 0.639)。
我们的结果表明,驾驶员座位乘客因其不良结局和解剖学严重损伤的风险较高而需要特别关注。这些发现将对车辆乘客、急诊医疗专业人员和汽车制造商有用。
不适用。