Bonfanti-Gris M, Herrera A, Salido Rodríguez-Manzaneque M P, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G
Department of Conservative and Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Plaza Ramón y Cajal S/N, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):1280. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06349-9.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize and evaluate the available information regarding the performance of deep learning methods for tooth detection and segmentation in orthopantomographies.
Electronic databases (Medline, Embase and Cochrane) were searched up to September 2023 for relevant observational studies and both, randomized and controlled clinical trials. Two reviewers independently conducted the study selection, data extraction, and quality assessments. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) assessment was adopted for collective grading of the overall body of evidence. From the 2,207 records identified, 20 studies were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted for the comparison of mesiodens detection and segmentation (n = 6) using sensitivity and specificity as the two main diagnostic parameters. A graphical summary of the analysis was also plotted and a Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, prediction region, summary point, and confidence region were illustrated.
The included studies quantitative analysis showed pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive LR, negative LR, and diagnostic odds ratio of 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.96), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.97), 15.7 (95% CI, 7.6-32.2), 0.08 (95% CI, 0.04-0.18), and 186 (95% CI, 44-793), respectively. A graphical summary of the meta-analysis was plotted based on sensitivity and specificity. Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic curves showed a positive correlation between logit-transformed sensitivity and specificity (r = 0.886).
Based on the results of the meta-analysis and GRADE assessment, a moderate recommendation is advised to dental operators when relying on AI-based tools for tooth detection and segmentation in panoramic radiographs.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在总结和评估关于深度学习方法在口腔全景片中进行牙齿检测和分割性能的现有信息。
检索截至2023年9月的电子数据库(Medline、Embase和Cochrane),以查找相关的观察性研究以及随机对照临床试验。两名研究者独立进行研究筛选、数据提取和质量评估。采用GRADE(推荐分级、评估、制定和评价)评估对整体证据进行集体分级。从识别出的2207条记录中,纳入20项研究进行分析。以敏感性和特异性作为两个主要诊断参数,对额外牙检测和分割(n = 6)进行荟萃分析。还绘制了分析的图形摘要,并展示了分层汇总接受者操作特征曲线、预测区域、汇总点和置信区域。
纳入研究的定量分析显示,合并敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比、阴性似然比和诊断比值比分别为0.92(95%置信区间[CI],0.84 - 0.96)、0.94(95% CI,0.89 - 0.97)、15.7(95% CI,7.6 - 32.2)、0.08(95% CI,0.04 - 0.18)和186(95% CI,44 - 793)。基于敏感性和特异性绘制了荟萃分析的图形摘要。分层汇总接受者操作特征曲线显示,对数转换后的敏感性和特异性之间存在正相关(r = 0.886)。
基于荟萃分析和GRADE评估结果,建议在全景X线片中依靠基于人工智能的工具进行牙齿检测和分割时,向牙科操作人员提出适度推荐。