Radhakrishnan Venkatraman, Gopalakrishnan Vidhya, Vihari Gundrathi Vamsi, Dasapathi Venkata Siva Kiran Kumar, Perumal Kalaiyarasi Jayachandran, Veeraiah Surendran, Rajaraman Swaminathan
Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Psycho-Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai, India.
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jul 31;33(8):730. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09807-w.
Cancer-associated fatigue is a prevalent and distressing symptom in patients receiving palliative chemotherapy. While short-term steroid use has been employed to alleviate fatigue, its long-term efficacy and safety remain unclear.
This phase III open-label, placebo-controlled randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone (4 mg once daily for 12 weeks) versus placebo (once daily for 12 weeks) in patients with solid malignancies undergoing palliative chemotherapy. Fatigue was assessed using the Symbolic Assessment of Fatigue Extent (SAFE) and EORTC FA-12 scales, and quality of life (QOL) was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks.
From October 2018 to September 2022, 126 patients were randomized; 101 were evaluable (dexamethasone: 49, placebo: 52). The median age was 46.5 years, and 67% were female. Metastatic breast cancer (28%) and lung cancer (16%) were the most common diagnoses. There were no significant differences between the arms in mean SAFE scores at 6 or 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, patients in the placebo arm reported better role functioning on the FA-12 (P = 0.02). In the EORTC QLQ-C30, the dexamethasone arm had more constipation at 6 weeks (P = 0.03) and 12 weeks (P = 0.01), and greater social sequelae at 12 weeks (P = 0.048). No significant differences in adverse events were observed between the arms.
Dexamethasone did not significantly reduce cancer-associated fatigue or improve QOL in patients receiving palliative chemotherapy. The findings highlight the need to explore alternative, more effective interventions for managing fatigue in this population.
CTRI/2018/08/015222, date: 07/08/2018.
癌症相关疲劳是接受姑息化疗患者中普遍存在且令人痛苦的症状。虽然短期使用类固醇已被用于缓解疲劳,但其长期疗效和安全性仍不明确。
这项III期开放标签、安慰剂对照随机试验评估了地塞米松(4毫克,每日一次,共12周)与安慰剂(每日一次,共12周)对接受姑息化疗的实体恶性肿瘤患者的疗效和安全性。使用疲劳程度的符号评估(SAFE)和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织疲劳量表(EORTC FA - 12)评估疲劳,在基线、6周和12周时使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ - C30量表测量生活质量(QOL)。
从2018年10月至2022年9月,126名患者被随机分组;101名患者可评估(地塞米松组:49名,安慰剂组:52名)。中位年龄为46.5岁,67%为女性。转移性乳腺癌(28%)和肺癌(16%)是最常见的诊断。在6周或12周时,两组的平均SAFE评分无显著差异。在12周时,安慰剂组患者在FA - 12量表上的角色功能表现更好(P = 0.02)。在EORTC QLQ - C30量表中,地塞米松组在6周(P = 0.03)和12周(P = 0.01)时便秘更多,在12周时社会后遗症更严重(P = 0.048)。两组之间不良事件无显著差异。
地塞米松在接受姑息化疗的患者中并未显著降低癌症相关疲劳或改善生活质量。研究结果凸显了探索替代的、更有效干预措施来管理该人群疲劳的必要性。
CTRI/2018/08/015222,日期:2018年8月7日。