• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过焦点小组和世界咖啡馆启发的研究议程,从公平视角探索支持就地养老的技术:定性研究

Exploring Technology Supporting Aging-in-Place Using an Equity Lens Through Focus Groups and World Café-Informed Research Agenda: Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Saragosa Marianne, Abejirinde Ibukun-Oluwa Omolade, MacEachern Evan, Nelson Michelle LA, Kokorelias Kristina M, Bharmal Sidra, Ludwig Prout Brina, Mohamed Marian

机构信息

Science of Care Institute, Sinai Health, 1 Bridgepoint Drive, Toronto, ON, M4M 2B5, Canada, 1 416-461-8252 ext 2895.

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

JMIR Aging. 2025 Jul 30;8:e71093. doi: 10.2196/71093.

DOI:10.2196/71093
PMID:40739982
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults prefer to age in their home or community of choice, which could include naturally occurring retirement communities (NORCs). As a place with a high density of older adults, NORCs could be sites where technology is leveraged to support independence and aging in the right place. However, there is limited research on how technology adoption and use occur in NORCs in ways that support older adults.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to cocreate a research agenda on equity-informed technology considerations that help older adults live independently in NORCs.

METHODS

This is a 2-phase sequential qualitative descriptive study of 5 community-based focus groups and an in-person World Café event. We use the focus group method to acquire data about older adults' experiences with and perceptions of using technology to support aging-in-place in NORC settings. This data informs the design and facilitation of deliberate dialogues at the World Café event. Three questions helped to guide the small group discussions. The World Café is a creative, collaborative, and conversation-generating method that aims to generate exchanges between people with different views on a particular topic.

RESULTS

In total, 45 NORC residents participated in a focus group about their experience and use of technology. The data revealed 3 central categories that highlight the perception of the use of technology to support the independence of participants in their homes and communities, its challenges, and areas to consider when deploying technology for helping older adults age in place. The subsequent World Café event included 40 participants and a combination of NORC residents, service providers, researchers, technology innovators, and policy makers. Insights drawn from the focus groups and World Café informed a 10-question research agenda about equity-informed technology principles that span accessible support, accessible interfaces, affordable and equitable access, available digital literacy training, accessible data, and accessible partnerships.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study explores NORCs as potential environments for offering a transformative opportunity to address equity considerations for technology supporting aging in place. Our findings and research agenda highlight critical areas for consideration, including leveraging partnerships, integrating public and private technology ecosystems, and designing technology with older users that evolves with the population's needs. Notably, by embedding principles of equity, inclusivity, and user-centered design, the collective of developers, researchers, and service providers can ensure that emerging technology serves diverse aging populations equitably and effectively.

摘要

背景

老年人更倾向于在自己选择的家中或社区养老,这可能包括自然形成的退休社区(NORC)。作为老年人高密度聚居的地方,NORC可以成为利用技术来支持老年人在合适的地方独立生活和养老的场所。然而,关于NORC中技术的采用和使用如何以支持老年人的方式发生的研究有限。

目的

本研究旨在共同制定一个基于公平性的技术考量研究议程,以帮助老年人在NORC中独立生活。

方法

这是一项分两个阶段进行的顺序定性描述性研究,包括5个基于社区的焦点小组和一次面对面的世界咖啡馆活动。我们使用焦点小组方法获取有关老年人在NORC环境中使用技术以支持就地养老的经历和看法的数据。这些数据为世界咖啡馆活动中精心设计的对话提供了信息并推动其进行。三个问题有助于指导小组讨论。世界咖啡馆是一种富有创造性、协作性且能引发对话的方法,旨在促进对特定主题有不同观点的人之间的交流。

结果

共有45名NORC居民参加了关于他们技术使用经历的焦点小组。数据揭示了3个核心类别,突出了对使用技术支持参与者在家庭和社区中独立生活的看法、其面临的挑战以及在部署技术以帮助老年人就地养老时需要考虑的领域。随后的世界咖啡馆活动有40名参与者,包括NORC居民、服务提供者、研究人员、技术创新者和政策制定者。从焦点小组和世界咖啡馆中获得的见解形成了一个包含10个问题的研究议程,涉及基于公平性的技术原则,涵盖无障碍支持、无障碍界面、可承受且公平的获取、可用的数字素养培训、可获取的数据以及可及的伙伴关系。

结论

我们的研究将NORC探索为一个潜在的环境,以提供一个变革性的机会来解决支持就地养老技术的公平性考量。我们的研究结果和研究议程突出了需要考虑的关键领域,包括利用伙伴关系、整合公共和私人技术生态系统以及与老年用户共同设计随人群需求发展的技术。值得注意的是,通过融入公平性、包容性和以用户为中心的设计原则,开发者、研究人员和服务提供者群体可以确保新兴技术公平且有效地服务于多样化的老年人群体。

相似文献

1
Exploring Technology Supporting Aging-in-Place Using an Equity Lens Through Focus Groups and World Café-Informed Research Agenda: Qualitative Study.通过焦点小组和世界咖啡馆启发的研究议程,从公平视角探索支持就地养老的技术:定性研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Jul 30;8:e71093. doi: 10.2196/71093.
2
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
4
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
5
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Evaluation of the NHS England Low-Calorie Diet implementation pilot: a coproduced mixed-method study.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)低热量饮食实施试点评估:一项联合开展的混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(29):1-63. doi: 10.3310/MPRT2139.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Experiences of community-dwelling older adults with the use of telecare in home care services: a qualitative systematic review.社区居家老年人在家居护理服务中使用远程护理的体验:一项质性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2017 Dec;15(12):2913-2980. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003345.
10
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
A portrait of older adults in naturally occurring retirement communities in Ontario, Canada: A population-based study.加拿大安大略省自然形成的退休社区中的老年人画像:一项基于人群的研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jan;73(1):74-87. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19278. Epub 2024 Dec 1.
2
Being and Doing Together in a Naturally Occurring Retirement Community: Pandemic Experiences of Older Adults.在自然形成的退休社区中共同生活与行动:老年人的疫情经历
Can J Aging. 2025 Mar;44(1):115-125. doi: 10.1017/S0714980824000345. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
3
Factors associated with transition to a nursing home in older adults living in naturally occurring retirement communities.
居住在自然形成的退休社区的老年人中与转至养老院相关的因素。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Jan;73(1):88-100. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19038. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
4
Factors influencing technology use among low-income older adults: A systematic review.影响低收入老年人技术使用的因素:一项系统综述。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 13;9(9):e20111. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20111. eCollection 2023 Sep.
5
Technology and aging: the jigsaw puzzle of design, development and distribution.技术与老龄化:设计、开发和传播的拼图游戏。
Nat Aging. 2022 Dec;2(12):1077-1079. doi: 10.1038/s43587-022-00325-6.
6
Aging in Place Through the COVID-19 Pandemic: Perspectives from Aging Service Providers.疫情下的就地老龄化:来自养老服务提供者的观点。
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Jul;42(7):1530-1540. doi: 10.1177/07334648231159375. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
7
The Intersectional Impact of Race/Ethnicity and Sex on Access to Technology Among Older Adults.种族/民族和性别对老年人获得技术的交叉影响。
Gerontologist. 2023 Aug 24;63(7):1162-1171. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac178.
8
The Impact of a Naturally Occurring Retirement Community Supportive Services Program on Older Adult Participants' Social Networks: Semistructured Interview Study.自然形成的退休社区支持服务项目对老年参与者社交网络的影响:半结构化访谈研究
JMIR Aging. 2022 Nov 21;5(4):e37617. doi: 10.2196/37617.
9
Equity in AgeTech for Ageing Well in Technology-Driven Places: The Role of Social Determinants in Designing AI-based Assistive Technologies.科技驱动环境下实现健康老龄化的年龄友好型科技中的公平性:社会决定因素在设计基于人工智能的辅助技术中的作用。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2022 Oct 27;28(6):49. doi: 10.1007/s11948-022-00397-y.
10
In-Home Monitoring Technology for Aging in Place: Scoping Review.居家养老的家庭监测技术:范围综述
Interact J Med Res. 2022 Sep 1;11(2):e39005. doi: 10.2196/39005.