Abdelhadi Ola, Williams Michelle, Yan Alice
Stanford Healthcare, Stanford, CA, United States.
Front Oncol. 2025 Jul 16;15:1562672. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1562672. eCollection 2025.
Non-Hispanic Black women have a disproportionately higher breast cancer mortality rate compared to non-Hispanic white women. Structural racism embedded within societal systems plays a fundamental role in perpetuating these persistent disparities. This systematic review aims to examine the relationship between structural racism and breast cancer quality of care outcomes across various racial and ethnic groups.
Following the PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published until October 30, 2024, that examined the relationship between structural racism and breast cancer quality of care outcomes. We employed the Healthy People's Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) framework to identify structural racism measures within these five themes: economic stability, education access, healthcare access, neighborhood and built environment, and social and community welfare. Breast cancer quality of care outcomes were assessed using the Donabedian quality of care model which encompasses three components of quality: process measures, structural measures, and outcome measures.
We conducted a systematic review of 262 studies that included at least one measure of structural racism linked to a breast cancer quality of care outcome. Of these, 29 studies met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. The most frequently examined measures of structural racism were those related to residential segregation and redlining, which pertain to neighborhood and built environment SDOH domains. The predominant finding across the studies was that both residential segregation and redlining were significantly associated with adverse breast cancer outcomes. Theses outcomes included higher mortality rates, later-stage diagnoses, and suboptimal treatment. These effects exhibited variability based on race, comorbidity, and neighborhood characteristics, highlighting the complex role of structural racism in perpetuating disparities in breast cancer outcomes.
The complex relationship between measures of structural racism and breast cancer quality of care outcomes underscores the necessity for ongoing research to understand the pathways through which structural racism impacts health outcomes. Understanding these pathways is essential for developing targeted interventions and promoting health equity in breast cancer care.
与非西班牙裔白人女性相比,非西班牙裔黑人女性的乳腺癌死亡率高得不成比例。社会系统中根深蒂固的结构性种族主义在使这些持续存在的差异长期存在方面起着根本性作用。本系统评价旨在研究结构性种族主义与不同种族和族裔群体乳腺癌护理质量结果之间的关系。
遵循PRISMA指南,我们对PubMed、Embase和CINAHL进行了系统评价,以查找截至2024年10月30日发表的研究,这些研究探讨了结构性种族主义与乳腺癌护理质量结果之间的关系。我们采用了“健康人民”健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)框架,在以下五个主题中确定结构性种族主义的衡量标准:经济稳定性、教育机会、医疗保健机会、邻里和建筑环境以及社会和社区福利。使用Donabedian护理质量模型评估乳腺癌护理质量结果,该模型包括质量的三个组成部分:过程指标、结构指标和结果指标。
我们对262项研究进行了系统评价,这些研究至少包括一项与乳腺癌护理质量结果相关的结构性种族主义衡量标准。其中,29项研究符合纳入标准。最常研究的结构性种族主义衡量标准是与居住隔离和红线划定相关的标准,这与邻里和建筑环境SDOH领域有关。这些研究的主要发现是,居住隔离和红线划定均与不良乳腺癌结果显著相关。这些结果包括更高的死亡率、更晚期的诊断和次优治疗。这些影响因种族、合并症和邻里特征而异,凸显了结构性种族主义在使乳腺癌结果差异长期存在方面的复杂作用。
结构性种族主义衡量标准与乳腺癌护理质量结果之间的复杂关系强调了持续研究的必要性,以了解结构性种族主义影响健康结果的途径。了解这些途径对于制定有针对性的干预措施和促进乳腺癌护理中的健康公平至关重要。