Zhang Qin, Wang Chengshuo, Cai Hongfei, Jin Shasha, Wang Qian, Fu Yanxin, Xiang Aomeng, Qi Jingman, Wu Liang, Liu Bin
Department of Sports Rehabilitation, Beijing Xiaotangshan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Exercise Physiology and Sports Medicine, Institute of Sport, Exercise & Health, Tianjin University of Sport, Tianjin, China.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 16;12:1596850. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1596850. eCollection 2025.
To investigate the effects of external diaphragmatic pacing (EDP) and repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) of the phrenic nerve on respiratory function in stroke patients.
Fifty-four stroke patients were randomly assigned to three groups: an EDP group ( = 18), an rPMS group ( = 18), and a combined treatment group ( = 18). All groups received routine breathing training. Additionally, the EDP group underwent EDP, the rPMS group received repeated peripheral magnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve, and the combined treatment group received a combination of both interventions. The treatment regimen lasted for 4 weeks. Pulmonary function parameters, including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV), FEV/FVC%, peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), were assessed using a pulmonary function tester. Diaphragmatic thickness (DT) and diaphragmatic excursion (DE) were evaluated via ultrasound imaging, whereas compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude and phrenic nerve conduction time (PNCT) were measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation technology.
Following 4 weeks of treatment, significant improvements were observed in FVC, FEV, PEF, MIP, and MEP across all three groups (all ). Moreover, the combined treatment group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in FVC, FEV, and MIP compared with either the EDP or rPMS group (). DT and DE were also significantly increased in all groups (), with more pronounced improvements in the combined treatment group than in the other groups (). In all three groups, CMAP amplitude increased significantly, whereas PNCT decreased significantly (). Furthermore, the reduction in PNCT was more obvious in the combined treatment group than in either the EDP or rPMS group ().
Compared with monotherapy using either EDP or rPMS, combined treatment demonstrates significantly greater efficacy in promoting respiratory function rehabilitation in stroke patients. Additionally, it shows potential advantages in improving phrenic nerve motor conduction.
探讨体外膈肌起搏(EDP)和膈神经重复外周磁刺激(rPMS)对脑卒中患者呼吸功能的影响。
54例脑卒中患者随机分为三组:EDP组(n = 18)、rPMS组(n = 18)和联合治疗组(n = 18)。所有组均接受常规呼吸训练。此外,EDP组进行体外膈肌起搏,rPMS组接受膈神经重复外周磁刺激,联合治疗组接受两种干预措施的联合治疗。治疗方案持续4周。使用肺功能测试仪评估肺功能参数,包括用力肺活量(FVC)、第1秒用力呼气量(FEV)、FEV/FVC%、呼气峰值流速(PEF)、最大吸气压力(MIP)和最大呼气压力(MEP)。通过超声成像评估膈肌厚度(DT)和膈肌移动度(DE),而复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)幅度和膈神经传导时间(PNCT)则使用经颅磁刺激技术进行测量。
治疗4周后,三组患者的FVC、FEV、PEF、MIP和MEP均有显著改善(均P < 0.05)。此外,联合治疗组在FVC、FEV和MIP方面的改善明显大于EDP组或rPMS组(P < 0.05)。所有组的DT和DE也显著增加(P < 0.05),联合治疗组的改善比其他组更明显(P < 0.05)。在所有三组中,CMAP幅度显著增加,而PNCT显著降低(P < 0.05)。此外,联合治疗组PNCT的降低比EDP组或rPMS组更明显(P < 0.05)。
与单独使用EDP或rPMS的单一疗法相比,联合治疗在促进脑卒中患者呼吸功能康复方面显示出显著更高的疗效。此外,它在改善膈神经运动传导方面显示出潜在优势。