Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.
Institute for Human Centered Engineering, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Biel/Bienne, Switzerland.
Chest. 2024 Sep;166(3):502-510. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.035. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
Electromagnetic stimulation of the phrenic nerve induces diaphragm contractions, but no coils for clinical use have been available. We recently demonstrated the feasibility of ventilation using bilateral transcutaneous noninvasive electromagnetic phrenic nerve stimulation (NEPNS) before surgery in lung-healthy patients with healthy weight in a dose-dependent manner.
Is NEPNS feasible in critically ill patients in an ICU setting?
This feasibility nonrandomized controlled study aimed to enroll patients within 36 h of intubation who were expected to remain ventilated for ≥ 72 h. The intervention group received 15-min bilateral transcutaneous NEPNS bid, whereas the control group received standard care. If sufficient, NEPNS was used without pressure support to ventilate the patient; pressure support was added if necessary to ventilate the patient adequately. The primary outcome was feasibility, measured as time to find the optimal stimulation position. Further end points were sessions performed according to the protocol or allowing a next-day catch-up session and tidal volume achieved with stimulation reaching only 3 to 6 mL/kg ideal body weight (IBW). A secondary end point was expiratory diaphragm thickness measured with ultrasound from days 1 to 10 (or extubation).
The revised European Union regulation mandated reapproval of medical devices, prematurely halting the study. Eleven patients (five in the intervention group, six in the control group) were enrolled. The median time to find an adequate stimulation position was 23 s (interquartile range, 12-62 s). The intervention bid was executed in 87% of patients, and 92% of patients including a next-day catch-up session. Ventilation with 3 to 6 mL/kg IBW was achieved in 732 of 1,701 stimulations (43.0%) with stimulation only and in 2,511 of 4,036 stimulations (62.2%) with additional pressure support. A decrease in diaphragm thickness was prevented by bilateral NEPNS (P = .034) until day 10.
Bilateral transcutaneous NEPNS was feasible in the ICU setting with the potential benefit of preventing diaphragm atrophy during mechanical ventilation. NEPNS ventilation effectiveness needs further assessment.
ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05238753; URL: www.
gov.
膈神经的电磁刺激可引起膈收缩,但目前尚无临床应用的线圈。我们最近证明,在肺健康、体重正常的患者中,在术前使用双侧经皮无创膈神经电磁刺激(NEPNS)是可行的,且这种刺激方式具有剂量依赖性。
NEPNS 在 ICU 环境中的危重症患者中是否可行?
这是一项可行性、非随机对照研究,旨在招募插管后 36 小时内的患者,这些患者预计需要通气≥72 小时。干预组接受 15 分钟的双侧经皮 NEPNS,每天两次,对照组接受标准护理。如果刺激足够,将使用 NEPNS 进行无压力支持通气;如果需要,将添加压力支持以充分通气。主要结局是找到最佳刺激位置的时间,这一指标用于评估可行性。进一步的终点是根据方案进行的治疗次数或允许次日追赶疗程,以及达到仅 3 至 6ml/kg 理想体重(IBW)的刺激潮气量。次要终点是第 1 天至第 10 天使用超声测量呼气时膈厚度(或拔管)。
修订后的欧盟法规要求重新批准医疗设备,这提前终止了研究。共纳入 11 名患者(干预组 5 名,对照组 6 名)。找到足够刺激位置的中位数时间为 23 秒(四分位距,12-62 秒)。87%的患者执行了每日两次的干预,92%的患者包括次日追赶疗程。仅使用刺激就可实现 3 至 6ml/kg IBW 的通气有 1701 次刺激中的 732 次(43.0%),而在 4036 次刺激中使用额外压力支持可实现 2511 次(62.2%)。双侧 NEPNS 可防止膈肌厚度减少(P=0.034),直至第 10 天。
双侧经皮 NEPNS 在 ICU 环境中是可行的,有可能在机械通气期间防止膈肌萎缩。NEPNS 通气效果需要进一步评估。
ClinicalTrials.gov;编号:NCT05238753;网址:www.clinicaltrials.gov。