Schulberg H C, Saul M, McClelland M, Ganguli M, Christy W, Frank R
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985 Dec;42(12):1164-70. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790350038008.
A two-stage assessment of newly admitted outpatients at community mental health centers and primary medical care centers found the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale to be highly sensitive but relatively nonspecific when compared with assessments of depression by the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Considerably higher than usual screening scores are recommended with both patient populations to improve the efficiency of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale. The reasons for our finding that primary care clinicians underdiagnose depressive disorder while psychiatric clinicians overdiagnose it relative to the Diagnostic Interview Schedule include varied presentations by each sector's patients, differing clinical acumen, and factors affecting third-party reimbursement.
一项针对社区心理健康中心和初级医疗保健中心新入院门诊患者的两阶段评估发现,与采用诊断访谈表进行的抑郁症评估相比,流行病学研究中心抑郁量表具有高度敏感性,但相对缺乏特异性。建议对这两类患者群体都采用比平常高得多的筛查分数,以提高流行病学研究中心抑郁量表的效率。我们发现,相对于诊断访谈表,初级保健临床医生对抑郁症诊断不足,而精神科临床医生诊断过度,其原因包括各部门患者的表现各异、临床敏锐度不同以及影响第三方报销的因素。