Bean Christian A L, Mueller Sophia B, Abitante George, Ciesla Jeffrey A, Cho Sun-Joo, Cole David A
Department of Psychology and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN USA.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, OH USA.
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2024;46(3):783-792. doi: 10.1007/s10862-024-10155-y. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale - Revised (CESD-R) is a popular self-report screening measure for depression. A 20-item questionnaire with scores ranging from 0 to 4 for each item, the CESD-R can produce total scores ranging from 0 to 80. However, the typical scoring protocol for the CESD-R restricts the range of possible scores to between 0 and 60 to retain the same range and clinical cutoff scores as the original CES-D. Despite the widespread adoption of this scoring approach, the psychometric impact has never been systematically examined. In an undergraduate and community adult sample ( = 869), item response theory analyses indicated that scoring the CESD-R with all 5 response options (CESD-R) provided nearly twice as much information about a person's latent depression for individuals with high levels of depression than did scoring the CESD-R with 4 response options per item (CESD-R). The CESD-R retained the strong reliability and factor structure of the CESD-R and was more sensitive to individual differences for participants at high levels of depression compared to the CESD-R. Results provide preliminary evidence that researchers and clinicians should score the CESD-R using the full 0-to-80 scale and a clinical cutoff score of 29.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10862-024-10155-y.
流行病学研究中心抑郁量表修订版(CESD-R)是一种常用的抑郁症自我报告筛查工具。CESD-R是一份包含20个条目的问卷,每个条目得分从0到4,总分范围为0到80。然而,CESD-R的典型计分方案将可能的得分范围限制在0到60之间,以保持与原始CES-D相同的范围和临床临界分数。尽管这种计分方法被广泛采用,但其心理测量学影响从未得到系统研究。在一个本科及社区成人样本(n = 869)中,项目反应理论分析表明,对于抑郁症程度较高的个体,使用所有5种反应选项对CESD-R进行计分(CESD-R)所提供的关于个体潜在抑郁程度的信息,几乎是每个条目使用4种反应选项对CESD-R进行计分(CESD-R)的两倍。CESD-R保留了CESD-R强大的信度和因子结构,并且与CESD-R相比,对于抑郁症程度较高的参与者,它对个体差异更敏感。结果提供了初步证据,表明研究人员和临床医生应使用完整的0到80分制对CESD-R进行计分,临床临界分数为29。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s10862-024-10155-y获取的补充材料。