• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The WHO Pandemic Agreement's Missing Epistemic Architectures: Infodemics and Antimicrobial Resistance as Examples.世界卫生组织大流行协定中缺失的认知架构:以信息疫情和抗微生物药物耐药性为例
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025 Jul 16;17(3):495-514. doi: 10.1007/s41649-025-00387-9. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.“心流状态”:对自闭症成年人任务沉浸现象学体验的质性研究
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
8
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.

本文引用的文献

1
Historic pandemic treaty is a triumph in a world being torn apart.
Nature. 2025 May;641(8061):8. doi: 10.1038/d41586-025-01307-5.
2
Pandemic treaty textual analysis: ethics and public health implications.
J Public Health (Oxf). 2025 Apr 16. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdaf040.
3
Media portrayals and social stigma surrounding COVID-19 survivors: a content analysis of Chinese media coverage.关于新冠病毒肺炎康复者的媒体报道与社会污名:中国媒体报道的内容分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):1222. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21840-2.
4
Patient and public involvement and engagement to improve impact on antimicrobial resistance.患者和公众的参与及介入,以提高对抗菌药物耐药性的影响。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jan 25;16(1):1022. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55410-8.
5
Using Large Language Models to Assist Antimicrobial Resistance Policy Development: Integrating the Environment into Health Protection Planning.
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 21;59(2):1243-1252. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c07842. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
6
Equitable access to pandemic products demands stronger public governance.公平获取大流行应对产品需要更强有力的公共治理。
Lancet. 2024 Nov 23;404(10467):2030-2032. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)02258-X. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
7
Combating medical misinformation and rebuilding trust in the USA.在美国打击医疗错误信息并重建信任。
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Nov;6(11):e773-e774. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00197-3. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
8
Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990-2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050.全球细菌对抗菌药物耐药性的负担 1990-2021:一项系统分析及对 2050 年的预测。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 28;404(10459):1199-1226. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01867-1. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
9
Trust in Physicians and Hospitals During the COVID-19 Pandemic in a 50-State Survey of US Adults.在对美国成年人进行的一项涵盖 50 个州的调查中,了解他们在 COVID-19 大流行期间对医生和医院的信任度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424984. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24984.
10
How the EU AI Act Seeks to Establish an Epistemic Environment of Trust.欧盟人工智能法案如何寻求建立一个可信赖的认知环境。
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2024 Jun 24;16(3):345-372. doi: 10.1007/s41649-024-00304-6. eCollection 2024 Jul.

世界卫生组织大流行协定中缺失的认知架构:以信息疫情和抗微生物药物耐药性为例

The WHO Pandemic Agreement's Missing Epistemic Architectures: Infodemics and Antimicrobial Resistance as Examples.

作者信息

Ho Calvin Wai Loon, Caals Karel

机构信息

School of Law, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Asian Bioeth Rev. 2025 Jul 16;17(3):495-514. doi: 10.1007/s41649-025-00387-9. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1007/s41649-025-00387-9
PMID:40741302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12304356/
Abstract

On 20 May 2025, the 78 World Health Assembly adopted the World Health Organization's Pandemic Agreement (PA). With the benefit of lessons learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic, the PA rightly focuses on advancing equity, but we are concerned that the PA appears to apply equity narrowly as distributive justice and neglects epistemic justice. Using infodemics and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) as examples, we argue that the PA misses epistemic architectures. We first explain why infodemics are an important public health concern that the PA seeks to address, even though it does not clearly mention them. We then explain why equity must be interpreted to include epistemic justice. Using infodemics as an example, we subsequently discuss how the epistemic architecture of the PA on infodemics will need to be set out clearly as an annex to the PA or through the adoption of an additional protocol. We note in particular that the PA could help to draw together different normative and human rights approaches and frameworks to meet the requirements of epistemic justice. A similar challenge applies to AMR as an epistemically complex phenomenon, and our argument is that a global response to AMR will require a just and equitable epistemic architecture that the PA could lay the foundation for.

摘要

2025年5月20日,第78届世界卫生大会通过了世界卫生组织的《大流行协定》(PA)。鉴于从新冠疫情中吸取的经验教训,《大流行协定》正确地将重点放在促进公平上,但我们担心该协定似乎将公平狭义地应用为分配正义,而忽视了认知正义。以信息疫情和抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)为例,我们认为《大流行协定》忽略了认知架构。我们首先解释为什么信息疫情是《大流行协定》试图解决的一个重要公共卫生问题,尽管它没有明确提及。然后我们解释为什么公平必须被解释为包括认知正义。以信息疫情为例,我们随后讨论如何将《大流行协定》关于信息疫情的认知架构作为《大流行协定》的附件或通过通过一项附加议定书来明确阐述。我们特别指出,《大流行协定》有助于整合不同的规范和人权方法及框架,以满足认知正义的要求。对于作为一种认知复杂现象的抗菌药物耐药性而言,也存在类似的挑战,我们的观点是,全球对抗菌药物耐药性的应对将需要一个公正公平的认知架构,而《大流行协定》可以为此奠定基础。