• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Impact of the MISSION Act on Quality and Outcomes of Major Cardiovascular Procedures Among Veterans.《任务法案》对退伍军人主要心血管手术质量和结果的影响。
JAMA. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.11661.
2
Comparison of Accessibility, Cost, and Quality of Elective Coronary Revascularization Between Veterans Affairs and Community Care Hospitals.退伍军人事务部和社区护理医院选择性冠状动脉血运重建的可及性、成本和质量比较。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Feb 1;3(2):133-141. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.4843.
3
Trends in Veteran hospitalizations and associated readmissions and emergency department visits during the MISSION Act era.军人医院住院治疗及相关再入院和急诊就诊趋势在 MISSION 法案时代。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct;59(5):e14332. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14332. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
4
Preoperative coronary interventions for preventing acute myocardial infarction in the perioperative period of major open vascular or endovascular surgery.术前冠状动脉介入治疗预防大型开放性血管或血管内手术后围手术期急性心肌梗死。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 3;7(7):CD014920. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014920.pub2.
5
Comparing Veterans Affairs and Private Sector Perioperative Outcomes After Noncardiac Surgery.比较非心脏手术后退伍军人事务部和私营部门的围手术期结局。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Mar 1;157(3):231-239. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6488.
6
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
7
Management and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Evaluation Across Health Care Systems: Comparison of Community Care and Integrated Veterans Affairs Health Care.跨医疗系统接受心血管评估患者的管理与结局:社区医疗与退伍军人事务部综合医疗的比较
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Aug 5;14(15):e041930. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.041930. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
8
The business case for hospital mobility programs in the veterans health care system: Results from multi-hospital implementation of the STRIDE program.退伍军人医疗保健系统中医院流动项目的商业案例:STRIDE 项目在多家医院实施的结果。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec;59 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e14307. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14307. Epub 2024 Apr 17.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Private-Sector Readmissions for Inpatient Surgery in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals.退伍军人健康管理局医院住院手术的私营部门再入院情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2452056. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52056.
2
Upcoding Linked To Up To Two-Thirds Of Growth In Highest-Intensity Hospital Discharges In 5 States, 2011-19.2011年至2019年期间,美国5个州高强度医院出院人数增长的三分之二可能与疾病诊断编码升级有关。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Dec;43(12):1619-1627. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00596.
3
Care Fragmentation, Social Determinants of Health, and Postoperative Mortality in Older Veterans.老年退伍军人的护理碎片化、健康的社会决定因素与术后死亡率。
J Surg Res. 2024 Aug;300:514-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.082. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
4
Lower comorbidity scores and severity levels in Veterans Health Administration hospitals: a cross-sectional study.退伍军人事务部医院的合并症评分和严重程度较低:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 8;24(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11063-3.
5
Outcomes of Women Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery in Veterans Affairs Compared With Non-Veterans Affairs Care Settings.退伍军人事务部与非退伍军人事务部护理环境中接受非心脏手术的女性的结果比较。
JAMA Surg. 2024 May 1;159(5):501-509. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.8081.
6
Outcomes of Veterans Treated in Veterans Affairs Hospitals vs Non-Veterans Affairs Hospitals.退伍军人在退伍军人事务部医院与非退伍军人事务部医院的治疗结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Dec 1;6(12):e2345898. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.45898.
7
Differences in use of Veterans Health Administration and non-Veterans Health Administration hospitals by rural and urban Veterans after access expansions.农村和城市退伍军人在获得医疗服务扩大后的退伍军人医疗管理局和非退伍军人医疗管理局医院使用差异。
J Rural Health. 2024 Jun;40(3):446-456. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12812. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
8
Universal Difference-in-Differences for Causal Inference in Epidemiology.通用差分法在流行病学因果推断中的应用
Epidemiology. 2024 Jan 1;35(1):16-22. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001676. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
9
Comparing Quality of Surgical Care Between the US Department of Veterans Affairs and Non-Veterans Affairs Settings: A Systematic Review.比较美国退伍军人事务部和非退伍军人事务部环境下的外科护理质量:系统评价。
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Aug 1;237(2):352-361. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000720. Epub 2023 May 8.
10
COVID-19 Death Rates in Urban and Rural Areas: United States, 2020.2020 年美国城乡地区的新冠肺炎死亡率。
NCHS Data Brief. 2022 Oct(447):1-8.

《任务法案》对退伍军人主要心血管手术质量和结果的影响。

Impact of the MISSION Act on Quality and Outcomes of Major Cardiovascular Procedures Among Veterans.

作者信息

Wu Jingyi, Kanter Genevieve P, Wagner Todd H, Chu Danny, Cashy John P, Prigge Jason M, Glorioso Thomas J, Rahman Natalia, Murali Nandini, Giri Jay, Nathan Ashwin S, Waldo Stephen W, Groeneveld Peter W

机构信息

Center for Healthcare Evaluation, Research, and Promotion/Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

出版信息

JAMA. 2025 Jul 31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.11661.

DOI:10.1001/jama.2025.11661
PMID:40742582
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12314774/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act expanded opportunities for veterans to obtain care outside the VA. However, the impact on health care outcomes is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the MISSION Act's impact on travel times and outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and aortic valve replacement (AVR).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective difference-in-differences cohort study included veterans receiving nonemergent/nonurgent PCI, CABG, or AVR between October 2016 and September 2022 in non-VA hospitals under MISSION Act coverage or in VA hospitals in the 48 contiguous US states or the District of Columbia. Analyses were conducted in 2023-2024.

EXPOSURES

Veterans eligible for non-VA care under the MISSION Act by living far from ( >60 minutes) the nearest VA medical center vs veterans living near (≤60 minutes) a VA medical center.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES): Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as rehospitalization for cardiovascular cause or mortality within 30 days of the procedure, and travel times for care were the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

The cohort comprised veterans receiving PCI (n = 43 000; 42 066 [98%] male; mean [SD] age, 69 [8.8] years), CABG (n = 23 301; 22 197 [98%] male; mean [SD] age, 69 [7.7] years), or AVR (n = 14 682; 14 336 [98%] male; mean [SD] age, 74 [9.6] years). After MISSION implementation, mean PCI travel times increased by 1.3 minutes for near patients and decreased by 29.2 minutes for far patients (difference in differences, -30.5 minutes; P < .001). Mean CABG travel times increased by 9.4 minutes for near patients and decreased by 18.1 minutes for far patients (difference in differences, -27.4 minutes; P < .001). Mean travel times for AVR increased by 10.0 minutes for near patients and decreased by 23.0 minutes for far patients (difference in differences, -33.1 minutes; P < .001). After MISSION implementation, mean PCI MACE rates decreased by 0.5 percentage points for near patients and increased by 2.3 percentage points for far patients (difference in differences, 2.8 percentage points; P <.001). Mean CABG MACE rates decreased by 6.5 percentage points for near patients and increased by 1.6 percentage points for far patients (difference in differences, 8.1 percentage points; P < .001). AVR MACE rates were not statistically different between the groups (P = .45).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

MISSION Act implementation was associated with substantial decreases in travel times among veterans who became geographically eligible for non-VA care. For these patients undergoing PCI or CABG, MISSION Act implementation was also associated with worsened 30-day MACE rates.

摘要

重要性

美国退伍军人事务部(VA)的《维持内部系统和加强外部综合网络(MISSION)法案》扩大了退伍军人在VA以外获得医疗服务的机会。然而,其对医疗保健结果的影响尚不确定。

目的

衡量《MISSION法案》对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)、冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的就诊时间和结果的影响。

设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性差分队列研究纳入了2016年10月至2022年9月期间在《MISSION法案》覆盖范围内的非VA医院或美国48个相邻州或哥伦比亚特区的VA医院接受非紧急/非急诊PCI、CABG或AVR的退伍军人。分析于2023 - 2024年进行。

暴露因素

根据《MISSION法案》,居住在距离最近的VA医疗中心较远(>60分钟)从而有资格获得非VA医疗服务的退伍军人,与居住在VA医疗中心附近(≤60分钟)的退伍军人。

主要结局和测量指标

主要不良心血管事件(MACE),定义为术后30天内因心血管原因再次住院或死亡,以及就医的旅行时间为主要结局。

结果

该队列包括接受PCI的退伍军人(n = 43000;42066[98%]为男性;平均[标准差]年龄,69[8.8]岁)、CABG(n = 23301;22197[98%]为男性;平均[标准差]年龄,69[7.7]岁)或AVR(n = 14682;14336[98%]为男性;平均[标准差]年龄,74[9.6]岁)。《MISSION法案》实施后,附近患者的PCI平均旅行时间增加了1.3分钟,而远处患者减少了29.2分钟(差分,-30.5分钟;P <.001)。附近患者的CABG平均旅行时间增加了9.4分钟,远处患者减少了18.1分钟(差分,-27.分钟;P <.001)。AVR的平均旅行时间附近患者增加了10.0分钟,远处患者减少了23.0分钟(差分,-33.1分钟;P <.001)。《MISSION法案》实施后,附近患者的PCI平均MACE发生率下降了0.5个百分点,远处患者增加了2.3个百分点(差分,2.8个百分点;P <.001)。附近患者的CABG平均MACE发生率下降了6.5个百分点,远处患者增加了1.6个百分点(差分,8.1个百分点;P <.001)。两组之间的AVR MACE发生率无统计学差异(P =.45)。

结论和相关性

《MISSION法案》的实施与在地理上有资格获得非VA医疗服务的退伍军人的旅行时间大幅减少有关。对于这些接受PCI或CABG的患者,《MISSION法案》的实施也与30天MACE发生率恶化有关。