Suppr超能文献

通过机械、超声和电阻抗心动图对左心室射血时间进行的对比测量。

Comparative measurements of left ventricular ejection time by mechano-, echo- and electrical impedance cardiography.

作者信息

Stern H C, Wolf G K, Belz G G

出版信息

Arzneimittelforschung. 1985;35(10):1582-6.

PMID:4074418
Abstract

Several electrical impedance cardiographic and mechanocardiographic methods for assessing left ventricular ejection time (LVET) were compared with the aortic valve LVET echogram to determine whether values from an impedance method allow an exact measurement of LVET. From seven healthy subjects, tracings of signals from the ECG, phonocardiogram, carotid pulse, and electrical impedance cardiography were inscribed simultaneously with M-mode aortic valve echograms which recorded the separation and closure of the aortic valves. LVETs were measured from each cycle according to several established techniques. To yield variations in the LVET, heart rate was increased using injections of atropine 0.25 mg i.v. every 10 min until the rate reached 100 to 110 beats/min. Using biometrical methods with different sensitivities to extreme values, individual regression analyses compared the LVET from carotid and from impedance tracings to the "real" value measured from the echogram. The results showed the carotid pulse values underestimate and the conventional impedance methods over- and underestimate the real LVET. A modified approach identified LVET onset at the crossing of the dZ/dt line from the impedance cardiogram with baseline or, when a presystolic wave appeared at higher heart rates, the first turning point in the dZ/dt curve before this wave, and the LVET termination as the initial signal from the second heart sound. This combination of impedance cardiography and phonocardiography offers a precise estimation of LVET in noninvasive cardiology.

摘要

将几种用于评估左心室射血时间(LVET)的电阻抗心动图和机械心动图方法与主动脉瓣LVET超声心动图进行比较,以确定电阻抗方法得出的值是否能精确测量LVET。从7名健康受试者身上,同步记录心电图、心音图、颈动脉搏动和电阻抗心动图的信号描记图,以及记录主动脉瓣开合的M型主动脉瓣超声心动图。根据几种既定技术测量每个心动周期的LVET。为了使LVET产生变化,每隔10分钟静脉注射0.25 mg阿托品以提高心率,直至心率达到100至110次/分钟。使用对极值具有不同敏感度的生物统计学方法,通过个体回归分析比较颈动脉描记图和电阻抗描记图得出的LVET与超声心动图测量的“真实”值。结果显示,颈动脉搏动值低估了真实LVET,而传统电阻抗方法则高估和低估了真实LVET。一种改进方法将LVET的起始点确定为电阻抗心动图的dZ/dt线与基线的交点,或者当心率较高时出现收缩前期波时,该波之前dZ/dt曲线的第一个转折点,LVET的终止点确定为第二心音的初始信号。电阻抗心动图和心音图的这种结合为无创心脏病学中LVET的精确估计提供了方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验