• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估医疗服务提供者中尊重孕产妇护理实践的工具的开发与验证

Development and validation of tool to assess respectful maternity care practices among healthcare providers.

作者信息

Dhakal Radha Devi, Dioso Regidor Iii Poblete, Sharma Kalpana, Dhungana Govinda Prasad

机构信息

Lincoln University College, Kota Bharu, Malaysia.

Department of Nursing, Lincoln University College, Malasiya, Malaysia.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):1007. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13155-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-13155-0
PMID:40745649
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Respectful maternity care in healthcare facilities during childbirth is a growing concern around the world. It is more than just an important component of care quality; it is also a human right. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a tool to assess respectful maternity care practices among healthcare providers in Nepal.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional study as part of an explanatory sequential mixed-method research design. The tool was developed using 9 steps in three phases: item development, scale development, and scale evaluation. Tool is a five-point Likert scale containing 36 items. Each item was rated on a 1-5 scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The participants were healthcare providers working in maternity units of various healthcare centers of Madhesh Province. The items were analyzed for validity and reliability with exploratory factor analysis. The data were analyzed via the Statistical Package for Social Science version 22.

RESULTS

The content validity index (CVI = 0.895), kappa index and content validity ratio (CVR) were calculated for each item and they were within an acceptable range. Analysis of internal consistency revealed an acceptable Cronbach's alpha value (0.925) for the 36 item RMCP scale, and seven subscales. The suitability of the data for factor analysis was confirmed by Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (0.801), and Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (0.000). Principal component analysis with varimax with Kaiser normalization rotation identified 7 factors with eigenvalues greater than one, accounting for 74.55% of the observed variance.

CONCLUSION

A new tool for respectful maternity care practices has been developed through a rigorous process of item generation and validity-reliability assessment in addition to confirmatory factor analysis to assess the respectful maternity care practices of healthcare providers in Nepal which is statistically proven to be valid and reliable, with an appropriate range of confirmatory factor analysis results. Assessing the RMC practices of health care providers during facility-based maternity care may be relevant.

摘要

背景

分娩期间医疗机构的尊重式孕产妇护理是全球日益关注的问题。它不仅仅是护理质量的重要组成部分,也是一项人权。本研究的目的是开发并验证一种工具,以评估尼泊尔医疗服务提供者的尊重式孕产妇护理实践。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,作为解释性序列混合方法研究设计的一部分。该工具分三个阶段使用9个步骤开发:条目开发、量表开发和量表评估。该工具是一个包含36个条目的五点李克特量表。每个条目按1至5分进行评分,范围从1(强烈不同意)到5(强烈同意)。参与者是在马德西省各医疗中心产科工作的医疗服务提供者。通过探索性因素分析对条目进行有效性和可靠性分析。数据通过社会科学统计软件包第22版进行分析。

结果

计算每个条目的内容效度指数(CVI = 0.895)、kappa指数和内容效度比(CVR),它们都在可接受范围内。内部一致性分析显示,36个条目的RMCP量表及七个子量表的Cronbach's alpha值(0.925)可接受。Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin值(0.801)证实了数据适合进行因素分析,Bartlett球形检验具有显著性(0.000)。采用Kaiser标准化旋转的主成分分析确定了7个特征值大于1的因素,占观察方差的74.55%。

结论

通过严格的条目生成以及效度-信度评估过程,此外还进行了验证性因素分析,开发出了一种用于评估尊重式孕产妇护理实践的新工具,以评估尼泊尔医疗服务提供者的尊重式孕产妇护理实践。经统计证明,该工具有效且可靠,具有适当范围的验证性因素分析结果。评估医疗机构孕产妇护理期间医疗服务提供者的RMC实践可能具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of tool to assess respectful maternity care practices among healthcare providers.评估医疗服务提供者中尊重孕产妇护理实践的工具的开发与验证
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):1007. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13155-0.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
4
Development and validation of a questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitude, and practice of snake envenomation among health care providers (KAPSE-HCPQ) in sub-Saharan African countries.撒哈拉以南非洲国家医疗保健人员蛇咬伤中毒知识、态度及实践调查问卷(KAPSE-HCPQ)的开发与验证
Trop Med Int Health. 2025 Jul;30(7):662-672. doi: 10.1111/tmi.14122. Epub 2025 May 8.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Respectful maternity care interventions to address women mistreatment in childbirth: What has been done?旨在解决分娩过程中妇女受虐待问题的尊重性孕产护理干预措施:已采取了哪些行动?
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06524-w.
8
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
9
Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the Mask Usability Scale: A Measure of the Perceived Usability of N95 Respirators Among Healthcare Students and Staff.口罩可用性量表的心理测量特性评估:一项针对医护专业学生和工作人员对N95口罩感知可用性的测量。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Aug;81(8):4613-4626. doi: 10.1111/jan.16590. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
10
Iranian university students' alcohol-related knowledge, attitude, and practice questionnaire (ISKAP alcohol Q): development and psychometric properties.伊朗大学生酒精相关知识、态度和行为问卷(ISKAP酒精问卷):编制与心理测量学特性
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02665-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Promoting respectful maternity care: challenges and prospects from the perspectives of midwives at a tertiary health facility in Ghana.促进尊重产妇护理:加纳一家三级保健机构助产士的观点中的挑战与展望。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 May 31;22(1):451. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04786-w.
2
Validating a scale to measure respectful maternity care in Australia: Challenges and recommendations.验证一种在澳大利亚衡量尊重产妇护理的量表:挑战与建议。
Midwifery. 2021 Dec;103:103090. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103090. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
3
Development and psychometric properties of Midwives' Knowledge and Practice Scale on Respectful Maternity Care (MKP-RMC).
尊重分娩照护的助产士知识与实践量表(MKP-RMC)的编制及心理测量学特性。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 3;15(11):e0241219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241219. eCollection 2020.
4
Perception of Women regarding Respectful Maternity Care during Facility-Based Childbirth.妇女在医疗机构分娩期间对尊重孕产妇护理的认知
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2020 Jul 4;2020:5142398. doi: 10.1155/2020/5142398. eCollection 2020.
5
Respectful maternity care and associated factors among women who delivered at Harar hospitals, eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.在埃塞俄比亚东部的哈拉尔医院分娩的妇女中尊重产妇护理及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-2757-x.
6
"I wouldn't have hit you, but you would have killed your baby:" exploring midwives' perspectives on disrespect and abusive Care in Ghana.“我本不想打你,但你会杀死你的孩子的”:探索加纳助产士对不尊重和虐待护理的看法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2691-y.
7
Mistreatment of women in public health facilities of Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚公共卫生机构中的妇女受虐待问题。
Reprod Health. 2019 Aug 27;16(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0781-y.
8
Disrespect and abuse during facility-based childbirth and its sociodemographic determinants - A barrier to healthcare utilization in rural population.基于医疗机构的分娩过程中的不尊重和虐待行为及其社会人口学决定因素——农村人口医疗保健利用的障碍
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Jan;8(1):239-245. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_247_18.
9
Development and Assessment of Respectful Maternity Care Questionnaire in Iran.伊朗尊重孕产妇护理问卷的编制与评估
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2018 Oct;6(4):334-349.
10
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.