• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MENDing康复:综合围手术期护理缩短微创冠状动脉搭桥术后住院时间

MENDing Recovery: Comprehensive Perioperative Care Cuts Hospital Stay After Minimally Invasive CABG.

作者信息

Ashenhurst Christine, Toubar Omar, Ponnambalam Menaka, Masters Roy, Guo Ming Hao, Issa Hugo, Ruel Marc

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, ON, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Innovations (Phila). 2025 Jul-Aug;20(4):350-358. doi: 10.1177/15569845251361492. Epub 2025 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1177/15569845251361492
PMID:40745945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12398631/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a novel multidisciplinary initiative, known as the Multimodal ENhanced Discharge (MEND), on length of stay (LOS) for patients undergoing minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS CABG).

METHODS

The MEND program aims to optimize the patient's preoperative condition and increase preparedness, provide individualized perioperative care, and ensure early postdischarge follow-up to support active recovery and facilitate early discharge. This single-center, retrospective analysis reviewed LOS and readmission data for 198 consecutive patients who underwent MICS CABG by a single surgeon. Of these, 91 patients received routine care (RC) and 107 patients received care through the MEND program.

RESULTS

The median ward (non-intensive care unit) LOS was significantly shorter by 33% in the MEND group versus the RC group (2 vs 3 days, < 0.001), resulting in a 40% shorter median total hospital LOS in the MEND group versus the RC group (2 vs 5 days, < 0.001). Readmission rates were 14.3% for RC and 6.6% in the MEND group ( = 0.12).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the MEND program in patients undergoing MICS CABG was associated with significantly shorter overall hospital LOS without an increase in readmission rates. No statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics between the RC and MEND cohorts were observed. These findings suggest MEND is an effective and generalizable program for optimizing recovery. Ultimately, this model of care has the potential to positively affect health care costs, improve surgical wait times, and expand capacity in MICS CABG programs.

摘要

目的

评估一项名为多模式强化出院(MEND)的新型多学科举措对接受微创冠状动脉旁路移植术(MICS CABG)患者住院时间(LOS)的影响。

方法

MEND计划旨在优化患者术前状况并提高准备程度,提供个性化围手术期护理,并确保出院后早期随访以支持积极康复并促进早期出院。这项单中心回顾性分析回顾了由一名外科医生连续进行MICS CABG手术的198例患者的住院时间和再入院数据。其中,91例患者接受常规护理(RC),107例患者通过MEND计划接受护理。

结果

MEND组的中位病房(非重症监护病房)住院时间比RC组显著缩短33%(2天对3天,<0.001),导致MEND组的中位总住院时间比RC组缩短40%(2天对5天,<0.001)。RC组的再入院率为14.3%,MEND组为6.6%(P = 0.12)。

结论

在接受MICS CABG手术的患者中实施MEND计划与显著缩短总住院时间相关,且再入院率没有增加。在RC组和MEND组之间未观察到基线特征的统计学显著差异。这些发现表明MEND是一个优化康复的有效且可推广的计划。最终,这种护理模式有可能对医疗成本产生积极影响,改善手术等待时间,并扩大MICS CABG项目的容量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bc/12398631/96379eba4587/10.1177_15569845251361492-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bc/12398631/f7cbc96ded3f/10.1177_15569845251361492-img2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bc/12398631/52ec63bac1b7/10.1177_15569845251361492-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bc/12398631/fa355ba5c0dd/10.1177_15569845251361492-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bc/12398631/cd3e7573f2d5/10.1177_15569845251361492-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bc/12398631/96379eba4587/10.1177_15569845251361492-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bc/12398631/f7cbc96ded3f/10.1177_15569845251361492-img2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bc/12398631/52ec63bac1b7/10.1177_15569845251361492-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bc/12398631/fa355ba5c0dd/10.1177_15569845251361492-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bc/12398631/cd3e7573f2d5/10.1177_15569845251361492-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/13bc/12398631/96379eba4587/10.1177_15569845251361492-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
MENDing Recovery: Comprehensive Perioperative Care Cuts Hospital Stay After Minimally Invasive CABG.MENDing康复:综合围手术期护理缩短微创冠状动脉搭桥术后住院时间
Innovations (Phila). 2025 Jul-Aug;20(4):350-358. doi: 10.1177/15569845251361492. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
2
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
3
Comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes between hybrid system and MiECC: A prospective pilot study.杂交系统与体外循环下冠状动脉搭桥术围手术期结果的比较分析:一项前瞻性试点研究。
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2025 Jun;57(2):74-81. doi: 10.1051/ject/2025001. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
4
Preoperative coronary interventions for preventing acute myocardial infarction in the perioperative period of major open vascular or endovascular surgery.术前冠状动脉介入治疗预防大型开放性血管或血管内手术后围手术期急性心肌梗死。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 3;7(7):CD014920. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014920.pub2.
5
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
6
Extended length of stay in open versus minimally invasive surgery with robotic-assisted sub-analysis for spinal nerve sheath tumor resection: a nationwide analysis.开放性手术与机器人辅助微创手术切除脊神经鞘瘤的住院时间延长及亚组分析:一项全国性分析。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 19;15(1):30309. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15121-6.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in a Low-Risk Asian Cohort: A Propensity-Score Matched Study.微创冠状动脉旁路移植术在低危亚洲人群中的应用:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul 22;39(4):e20220421. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0421.
9
Perioperative High-Dose Steroid in Insulin-Treated Patients With Diabetes Undergoing Fast-Track Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Impact on Length of Stay and Discharge Blood Glucose Levels.接受快速康复髋膝关节置换术的胰岛素治疗糖尿病患者围手术期大剂量类固醇:对住院时间和出院时血糖水平的影响。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Aug;69(7):e70100. doi: 10.1111/aas.70100.
10
Minimally Invasive Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass as Palliative Revascularization in High-Risk Patients.微创非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术作为高危患者的姑息性血运重建术
Clin Pract. 2025 Aug 6;15(8):147. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15080147.

本文引用的文献

1
Maximizing Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery With Enhanced Recovery (ERAS).最大限度提高微创心脏手术的增强康复(ERAS)效果。
Innovations (Phila). 2024 Jul-Aug;19(4):371-379. doi: 10.1177/15569845241264565. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
2
Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: A Joint Consensus Statement by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Cardiac Society, ERAS International Society, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS).心脏外科手术的围手术期护理:增强术后恢复协会(ERAS)心脏学会、ERAS 国际学会和胸外科医师学会(STS)的联合共识声明。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Apr;117(4):669-689. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.12.006. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
3
Less Invasive and Hybrid Surgical/Interventional Coronary Disease Management: The Future Is Now.
微创与杂交手术/介入性冠心病管理:未来已来。
Can J Cardiol. 2024 Feb;40(2):290-299. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.11.043. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
Preoperative intervention for smoking cessation: A systematic review.术前戒烟干预:一项系统综述。
Am J Surg. 2024 Jan;227:175-182. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.10.016. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
5
Preoperative optimization and rapid discharge after coronary artery bypass grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后的术前优化和快速出院。
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2023 Nov 1;38(6):471-477. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000001076. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
6
Long-term survival, cardiovascular, and functional outcomes after minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting in 566 patients.566 例患者微创冠状动脉旁路移植术后的长期生存、心血管和功能结局。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Oct;168(4):1080-1088.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.07.047. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
7
Feasibility of Postoperative Day One or Day Two Discharge After Robotic Cardiac Surgery.机器人心脏手术后第 1 天或第 2 天出院的可行性。
J Surg Res. 2023 Sep;289:35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.03.019. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
8
Perioperative Optimization of the Cardiac Surgical Patient.心脏外科手术患者的围手术期优化
Can J Cardiol. 2023 Apr;39(4):497-514. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.01.032. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
9
Perioperative Quality Initiative and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery-Cardiac Society Consensus Statement on the Management of Preoperative Anemia and Iron Deficiency in Adult Cardiac Surgery Patients.围手术期质量倡议和术后快速康复-心脏协会关于成人心脏手术患者术前贫血和缺铁管理的共识声明。
Anesth Analg. 2022 Sep 1;135(3):532-544. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006148. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
10
Baseline depressive symptoms, personal control, and concern moderate the effects of preoperative psychological interventions: the randomized controlled PSY-HEART trial.基线抑郁症状、个人控制感和担忧程度调节了术前心理干预的效果:随机对照 PSY-HEART 试验。
J Behav Med. 2022 Jun;45(3):350-365. doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00319-0. Epub 2022 May 6.