• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass as Palliative Revascularization in High-Risk Patients.微创非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术作为高危患者的姑息性血运重建术
Clin Pract. 2025 Aug 6;15(8):147. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15080147.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Preoperative coronary interventions for preventing acute myocardial infarction in the perioperative period of major open vascular or endovascular surgery.术前冠状动脉介入治疗预防大型开放性血管或血管内手术后围手术期急性心肌梗死。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 3;7(7):CD014920. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014920.pub2.
4
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
5
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
6
Surgical Myocardial Revascularization with a Composite T-graft from the Left Internal Mammary Artery-Comparison of the Great Saphenous Vein with the Radial Artery.左内乳动脉复合 T 型移植物行冠状动脉旁路移植术——大隐静脉与桡动脉的比较。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep;72(6):413-422. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771358. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
7
Cardiac Surgery心脏外科手术
8
Ischemic Mitral Valve Regurgitation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting-Early and Late-Term Outcomes of Surgical Treatment.接受冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的缺血性二尖瓣反流——外科治疗的早期和晚期结果
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 9;14(14):4855. doi: 10.3390/jcm14144855.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Hybrid total arterial minimally invasive off-pump coronary revascularization and percutaneous coronary intervention strategy for multivessel coronary artery disease: a cohort study with a median 11-year follow-up.多支冠状动脉疾病的杂交全动脉微创非体外循环冠状动脉血运重建和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略:一项中位随访11年的队列研究
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2024 Apr 30;14(2):272-282. doi: 10.21037/cdt-23-413. Epub 2024 Apr 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Is minimally invasive multi-vessel off-pump coronary surgery as safe and effective as MIDCAB?微创非体外循环多支血管冠状动脉手术与微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术一样安全有效吗?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 29;11:1385108. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1385108. eCollection 2024.
2
The frail patient undergoing cardiac surgery: lessons learned and future perspectives.接受心脏手术的虚弱患者:经验教训与未来展望。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 6;10:1295108. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1295108. eCollection 2023.
3
Long-term follow-up of patients with complex coronary artery disease treated with minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass.微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗复杂冠状动脉疾病患者的长期随访。
Cardiol J. 2023;30(6):1003-1009. doi: 10.5603/cj.94716. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
4
Minimally invasive strategies of surgical coronary artery revascularization for the aging population.针对老年人群的外科冠状动脉血运重建的微创策略。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2023 Oct;64(5):534-540. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12621-8. Epub 2023 May 31.
5
The Pragmatic Impact of Frailty on Outcomes of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.衰弱对冠状动脉旁路移植术结局的实际影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jul;112(1):108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.08.028. Epub 2020 Oct 17.
6
Association of Frailty and Long-Term Survival in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.衰弱与冠状动脉旁路移植术后长期生存的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 20;7(15):e009882. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009882.
7
Minimally invasive surgical techniques in the era of hybrid coronary revascularization: additional benefits for the elderly patients?杂交冠状动脉血运重建时代的微创外科技术:对老年患者有额外益处吗?
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Oct;13(10):875-879. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.10.009.
8
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting versus optimal medical therapy alone: effectiveness of incomplete revascularization in high risk patients.非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术与单纯最佳药物治疗的比较:高危患者不完全血运重建的效果。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Jan;13(1):23-30. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.01.008.
9
Hybrid coronary revascularization: which patients? When? How?杂交冠状动脉血运重建:哪些患者?何时?如何?
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010 Nov;25(6):568-74. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32833f02fb.
10
Does reasonable incomplete surgical revascularization affect early or long-term survival in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease receiving left internal mammary artery bypass to left anterior descending artery?对于接受左乳内动脉至左前降支搭桥术的多支冠状动脉疾病患者,合理的不完全外科血管重建是否会影响其早期或长期生存?
Circulation. 2009 Sep 15;120(11 Suppl):S70-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.842005.

微创非体外循环冠状动脉搭桥术作为高危患者的姑息性血运重建术

Minimally Invasive Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass as Palliative Revascularization in High-Risk Patients.

作者信息

Rufa Magdalena, Ursulescu Adrian, Ahad Samir, Nagib Ragi, Albert Marc, Ayala Rafael, Göbel Nora, Shavahatli Tunjay, Ghinescu Mihnea, Franke Ulrich, Rylski Bartosz

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Robert Bosch Hospital, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Heart Centre Freiburg Bad Krozingen, 79189 Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Pract. 2025 Aug 6;15(8):147. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15080147.

DOI:10.3390/clinpract15080147
PMID:40863098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12384423/
Abstract

In high-risk and frail patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MV CAD), guidelines indicated complete revascularization with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) bears a high morbidity and mortality risk. In cases where catheter interventions were deemed unsuitable and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) posed an unacceptable perioperative risk, patients were scheduled for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting or minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS-CABG). We called this approach "palliative revascularization." This study assesses the safety and impact of palliative revascularization on clinical outcomes and overall survival. A consecutive series of 57 patients undergoing MIDCAB or MICS-CABG as a palliative surgery between 2008 and 2018 was included. The decision for palliative surgery was met in heart team after carefully assessing each case. The patients underwent single or double-vessel revascularization using the left internal thoracic artery and rarely radial artery/saphenous vein segments, both endoscopically harvested. Inpatient data could be completed for all 57 patients. The mean follow-up interval was 4.2 ± 3.7 years, with a follow-up rate of 91.2%. Mean patient age was 79.7 ± 7.4 years. Overall, 46 patients (80.7%) were male, 26 (45.6%) had a history of atrial fibrillation and 25 (43.9%) of chronic kidney disease. In total, 13 patients exhibited a moderate EuroSCORE II, while 27 were classified as high risk, with a EuroSCORE II exceeding 5%. Additionally, 40 patients (70.2%) presented with three-vessel disease, 17 (29.8%) suffered an acute myocardial infarction within three weeks prior to surgery and 50.9% presented an impaired ejection fraction. There were 48 MIDCAB and nine MICS CABG with no conversions either to sternotomy or to CPB. Eight cases were planned as hybrid procedures and only 15 patients (26.3%) were completely revascularized. During the first 30 days, four patients (7%) died. A myocardial infarction occurred in only one case, no patient necessitated immediate reoperation. The one-, three- and five-year survival rates were 83%, 67% and 61%, respectively. MIDCAB and MICS CABG can be successfully conducted as less invasive palliative surgery in high-risk multimorbid patients with MV CAD. The early and mid-term results were better than predicted. A higher rate of hybrid procedures could improve long-term outcome in selected cases.

摘要

在患有多支冠状动脉疾病(MV CAD)的高危和体弱患者中,指南指出,无论是否使用体外循环(CPB)进行完全血运重建都有较高的发病率和死亡率风险。在导管介入被认为不合适且传统冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)存在不可接受的围手术期风险的情况下,患者被安排进行微创直接冠状动脉旁路移植术(MIDCAB)或微创多支冠状动脉旁路移植术(MICS - CABG)。我们将这种方法称为“姑息性血运重建”。本研究评估了姑息性血运重建对临床结局和总体生存的安全性及影响。纳入了2008年至2018年间连续57例行MIDCAB或MICS - CABG作为姑息性手术的患者。在心脏团队仔细评估每个病例后做出了姑息性手术的决定。患者使用左内乳动脉,很少使用桡动脉/大隐静脉段进行单支或双支血管血运重建,两者均通过内镜获取。所有57例患者的住院数据均可完善。平均随访时间为4.2±3.7年,随访率为91.2%。患者平均年龄为79.7±7.4岁。总体而言,46例(80.7%)为男性,26例(45.6%)有房颤病史,25例(43.9%)有慢性肾病。共有13例患者EuroSCORE II评分为中度,27例被归类为高危,EuroSCORE II超过5%。此外,40例(70.2%)患者患有三支血管病变,17例(29.8%)在手术前三周内发生急性心肌梗死,50.9%的患者射血分数受损。共进行了48例MIDCAB和9例MICS CABG,均未转为胸骨切开术或体外循环。8例计划为杂交手术,仅15例(26.3%)患者实现了完全血运重建。在最初30天内,4例(7%)患者死亡。仅1例发生心肌梗死,无患者需要立即再次手术。1年、3年和5年生存率分别为83%、67%和61%。对于患有MV CAD的高危多病患者,MIDCAB和MICS CABG可作为侵入性较小的姑息性手术成功实施。早期和中期结果优于预期。在某些特定病例中,更高比例的杂交手术可能会改善长期结局。