Vara-Luiz Francisco, Fernandes Alexandra, Bispo Miguel, Vilas-Boas Filipe, Cúrdia-Gonçalves Tiago, Rodrigues-Pinto Eduardo, Pinto-Marques Pedro
Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal.
Aging Lab, Egas Moniz Center for Interdisciplinary Research (CiiEM), Egas Moniz School of Health and Science, Almada, Portugal.
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1159/000547298.
Pancreatic cysts are increasingly recognized nowadays, with estimated prevalence that may reach 50% in aging populations. Most cysts are of benign origin, and only a small proportion has malignant potential, including intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). Since pancreatic cysts are common, the most important goal was to identify the small percentage at high risk of developing malignancy. The increased detection and awareness of IPMNs led to the development of several consensus and guidelines, with only the most recent being evidence-based.
Current consensus guidelines recommend risk assessment to prioritize high-risk patients for malignancy. In the Fukuoka/Kyoto guidelines, the predictive factors of malignancy are called "high-risk stigmata" and "worrisome features." Conversely, other guidelines consider the terms "absolute indication" and "relative indication" for surgery, as well as criteria for referral to multidisciplinary groups. In case of non-resected IPMNs, criteria for surveillance depend on cyst size, with magnetic resonance imaging pointed as the most consensual modality for follow-up, although the recommended imaging modality varies among consensus. In some situations, namely, older age, frailty/comorbidities, or stability of cyst size, follow-up discontinuation may be considered.
Performance of surveillance guidelines is measured by the ability to identify patients with high-grade dysplasia/early stage-invasive cancer. Guidelines with more intense protocols will likely lead to fewer missed cancers, balanced by a greater number of benign resections. Multidisciplinary management preferably in reference centers is of utmost importance given the indolent and complex nature of the disease, and a global evidence-based guideline that combines the several guidelines' groups is mandatory to uniformize care. In this review, the Portuguese Pancreatic Club summarizes the risk assessment and surveillance strategy of a patient with an IPMN according to different guidelines in order to create an updated perspective and to guide clinical care.
胰腺囊肿如今越来越受到关注,在老年人群中的估计患病率可能达到50%。大多数囊肿为良性起源,只有一小部分具有恶变潜能,包括导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMNs)。由于胰腺囊肿很常见,最重要的目标是识别出有恶变高风险的小部分病例。IPMNs检测率和认知度的提高促使了多项共识和指南的制定,只有最新的是基于证据的。
当前的共识指南建议进行风险评估,以确定恶性肿瘤高风险患者的优先级。在福冈/京都指南中,恶性肿瘤的预测因素被称为“高风险特征”和“可疑特征”。相反,其他指南考虑手术的“绝对指征”和“相对指征”以及转诊至多学科团队的标准。对于未切除的IPMNs,监测标准取决于囊肿大小,磁共振成像被认为是随访中最具共识性的检查方式,尽管不同共识中推荐的成像方式有所不同。在某些情况下,即年龄较大、身体虚弱/合并症或囊肿大小稳定时,可考虑停止随访。
监测指南的执行情况通过识别高级别异型增生/早期浸润癌患者的能力来衡量。方案更严格的指南可能会减少漏诊癌症的情况,但代价是良性切除的数量会增加。鉴于该疾病进展缓慢且复杂的性质,在参考中心进行多学科管理至关重要,并且需要一个结合多个指南组的基于全球证据的指南来统一治疗。在本综述中,葡萄牙胰腺俱乐部根据不同指南总结了IPMN患者的风险评估和监测策略,以形成最新观点并指导临床治疗。