• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卵巢癌患者的社会脆弱性与治疗可及性的关联

Association of social vulnerability with access to treatment in ovarian cancer patients.

作者信息

Bastin Nikita, Robinson Marc, Javid Amir, Prescott Lauren S, Brown Alaina J

机构信息

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Jul 20;60:101808. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101808. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1016/j.gore.2025.101808
PMID:40746428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12311442/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To understand disparities in access to treatment for ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who had surgery for ovarian cancer at a comprehensive cancer center from 2018 to 2024 was completed. Social Vulnerability index quartiles generated by patients' zip codes were used as measures of social vulnerability. Social vulnerability encompasses four themes, including socioeconomic status, household characteristics, racial/ethnic minority status, and housing type and transportation. The primary outcome was time to treatment initiation. Secondary outcomes included time to chemotherapy, time to surgery, time to palliative care treatment, and progression-free survival. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between social vulnerability and treatment access.

RESULTS

Among 166 ovarian cancer patients, there was a trend towards increased time from diagnosis to treatment amongst patients with the highest social vulnerability (median 40 days) when compared to those with lower social vulnerability (median 22 - 27 days). When examining specific treatments received, patients with lower social vulnerability were more likely to experience shorter times to chemotherapy (median 29.5-32 days) when compared to patients with higher social vulnerability (median 41 - 45 days). Patients with the highest social vulnerability experienced the longest time to surgery (median 128 days) amongst all quartiles. There was a trend towards shorter times from diagnosis to palliative care consultation for patients of higher social vulnerability.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher social vulnerability was associated with longer times to curative treatment and shorter times to palliative care consultation among ovarian cancer patients. Further study in more diverse patient populations is necessary to ensure the equitable delivery of care in ovarian cancer.

摘要

目的

了解卵巢癌患者在获得治疗方面的差异。

方法

对2018年至2024年在一家综合癌症中心接受卵巢癌手术的患者进行了回顾性研究。将患者邮政编码生成的社会脆弱性指数四分位数用作社会脆弱性的衡量指标。社会脆弱性包括四个主题,即社会经济地位、家庭特征、种族/族裔少数群体地位以及住房类型和交通情况。主要结局是开始治疗的时间。次要结局包括开始化疗的时间、手术时间、姑息治疗开始时间和无进展生存期。采用逻辑回归评估社会脆弱性与治疗可及性之间的关系。

结果

在166名卵巢癌患者中,社会脆弱性最高的患者(中位时间40天)从诊断到治疗的时间有增加趋势,而社会脆弱性较低的患者(中位时间22 - 27天)则不然。在检查接受的具体治疗时,社会脆弱性较低的患者与社会脆弱性较高的患者(中位时间41 - 45天)相比,更有可能经历较短的化疗时间(中位时间29.5 - 32天)。社会脆弱性最高的患者在所有四分位数中经历的手术时间最长(中位时间128天)。社会脆弱性较高的患者从诊断到姑息治疗咨询的时间有缩短趋势。

结论

社会脆弱性较高与卵巢癌患者接受根治性治疗的时间较长和姑息治疗咨询的时间较短有关。有必要在更多样化的患者群体中进行进一步研究,以确保卵巢癌护理的公平提供。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/571f/12311442/4d196b90a304/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/571f/12311442/c2b46549c888/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/571f/12311442/7bf4d4923162/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/571f/12311442/4d196b90a304/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/571f/12311442/c2b46549c888/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/571f/12311442/7bf4d4923162/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/571f/12311442/4d196b90a304/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of social vulnerability with access to treatment in ovarian cancer patients.卵巢癌患者的社会脆弱性与治疗可及性的关联
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025 Jul 20;60:101808. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101808. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Do Patients of Different Levels of Affluence Receive Different Care for Pediatric Osteosarcomas? One Institution's Experience.不同富裕程度的患者在小儿骨肉瘤治疗上是否得到不同的护理?一家机构的经验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):748-758. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003299. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
5
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
6
Taxane monotherapy regimens for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.紫杉烷类单药治疗方案用于复发性上皮性卵巢癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 12;7(7):CD008766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008766.pub3.
7
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
Validating the Social Vulnerability Index for alternative geographies in the United States to explore trends in social determinants of health over time and geographic location.验证美国不同地理区域的社会脆弱性指数,以探究健康的社会决定因素随时间和地理位置的变化趋势。
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 4;13:1547946. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1547946. eCollection 2025.
2
All-cause mortality and neighborhood social vulnerability among women with ovarian cancer.卵巢癌女性的全因死亡率与社区社会脆弱性
Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Apr;195:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2025.02.014. Epub 2025 Mar 5.
3
Social vulnerability is associated with advanced breast cancer presentation and all-cause mortality: a retrospective cohort study.
社会脆弱性与晚期乳腺癌的呈现及全因死亡率相关:一项回顾性队列研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2024 Dec 3;26(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s13058-024-01930-6.
4
Association of neighborhood social vulnerability with ovarian cancer survival.邻里社会脆弱性与卵巢癌生存率的关联。
Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Jan;192:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.030. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
5
The effect of urban racial residential segregation on ovarian cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival.城市种族居住隔离对卵巢癌诊断、治疗及生存的影响。
Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Aug;187:163-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.007. Epub 2024 May 23.
6
An intersectionality framework for identifying relevant covariates in health equity research.健康公平研究中识别相关协变量的交叉性框架。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 14;12:1286121. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1286121. eCollection 2024.
7
Defining the Role of Social Vulnerability in the Treatment and Survival of Localized Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.界定社会脆弱性在局限性结肠癌治疗及生存中的作用:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Surg. 2025 Jun 1;281(6):1055-1062. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006282. Epub 2024 Mar 28.
8
Services, models of care, and interventions to improve access to cancer treatment for adults who are socially disadvantaged: A scoping review protocol.为社会弱势群体的成年人改善癌症治疗获取途径的服务、护理模式和干预措施:系统评价方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 26;19(2):e0296658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296658. eCollection 2024.
9
Impact of Treatment Delay on the Prognosis of Patients with Ovarian Cancer: A Population-based Study Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database.治疗延迟对卵巢癌患者预后的影响:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的人群研究。
J Cancer. 2024 Jan 1;15(2):473-483. doi: 10.7150/jca.87881. eCollection 2024.
10
Racial and socioeconomic disparities in survival among women with advanced-stage ovarian cancer who received systemic therapy.接受全身治疗的晚期卵巢癌女性患者生存中的种族和社会经济差异。
Cancer Causes Control. 2024 Mar;35(3):487-496. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01810-y. Epub 2023 Oct 24.