Kumar Ankush, Samra Rupandeep Kaur, Verma Shweta, Kumar Vijay, Sawhney Mischeal Kaur
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Himachal Dental College, Sunder Nagar, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown and Bridge, DJ College of Dental Sciences and Research, Modinagar, Uttar Pradesh, India.
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):693-699. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_290_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
The current research aimed to gauge the sealing ability using dye penetration and stereomicroscope and marginal adaptation under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) for various furcation repair materials, namely Bio-C Repair, MTA Angelus, GC Fuji VII, and TheraCal LC.
The objective of this study was to compare and evaluate four furcation repair materials for their sealing ability and marginal adaptation.
Seventy mandibular molars with nonfused and well-developed roots were selected, and a comparison between four furcation repair materials, namely MTA Angelus, Bio-C Repair, GC Fiji VII, and TheraCal LC, was done. In the first group, 50 samples were tested for sealing ability using the dye penetration method and stereomicroscope, and in the second group, 20 samples were studied for marginal adaptation using SEM.
The mean value of microleakage for the Bio-C Repair was the lowest, whereas the mean value for the control group was found to be highest among all materials used. MTA Angelus had a mean value between the Bio-C Repair and GC Fuji VII. The multiple intergroup comparisons showed significant differences between all the subgroups in terms of marginal adaptation. Furthermore, the highest marginal gap values were found in the TheraCal group among all the experimental groups. Bio-C Repair showed the lowest gap formation as compared to all other tested materials.
Bio-C Repair and MTA Angelus are good furcation repair materials.
Furcation perforations from endodontic treatment can jeopardize prognosis by damaging periodontal fibers and potentially causing tooth loss. Opting for a biocompatible furcation repair material enhances the effectiveness of treatment and promotes better healing.
当前研究旨在使用染料渗透法和体视显微镜评估不同根分叉修复材料(即Bio-C Repair、MTA Angelus、GC Fuji VII和TheraCal LC)的封闭能力,并在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下观察边缘适应性。
本研究的目的是比较和评估四种根分叉修复材料的封闭能力和边缘适应性。
选取70颗下颌磨牙,牙根未融合且发育良好,对四种根分叉修复材料(即MTA Angelus、Bio-C Repair、GC Fiji VII和TheraCal LC)进行比较。第一组中,50个样本使用染料渗透法和体视显微镜测试封闭能力,第二组中,20个样本使用SEM研究边缘适应性。
Bio-C Repair的微渗漏平均值最低,而在所有使用的材料中,对照组的平均值最高。MTA Angelus的平均值介于Bio-C Repair和GC Fuji VII之间。多组间比较显示,所有亚组在边缘适应性方面存在显著差异。此外,在所有实验组中,TheraCal组的边缘间隙值最高。与所有其他测试材料相比,Bio-C Repair的间隙形成最低。
Bio-C Repair和MTA Angelus是良好的根分叉修复材料。
根管治疗导致的根分叉穿孔可能会破坏牙周纤维并可能导致牙齿脱落,从而危及预后。选择生物相容性良好的根分叉修复材料可提高治疗效果并促进更好的愈合。