Mizumoto Masashi, Oshiro Yoshiko, Maruo Kazushi, Li Yinuo, Harada Masahiko, Niitsu Hikaru, Ishida Toshiki, Sumiya Taisuke, Baba Keiichiro, Murakami Motohiro, Nakamura Masatoshi, Iizumi Takashi, Saito Takashi, Numajiri Haruko, Nakai Kei, Sakurai Hideyuki
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan.
Liver Cancer. 2025 Jun 22. doi: 10.1159/000546559.
Particle therapy (PT) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is expected to provide good local control. However, it is difficult to compare PT with the current standard treatment modalities, surgery, and chemotherapy. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature to compare PT with surgery and drug therapy.
A meta-analysis was performed using studies from 2010 to 2024 in which PT or surgery or drug therapy was performed for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. 40 articles (7 PT, 13 surgery, 19 drug therapy, one surgery, and drug therapy) were selected based on used of radial surgery or first-line drug therapy. PT was basically for unresectable cases, and 80% of drug therapy cases had distant metastases.
Forty selected articles found 1-3-year OS rates (PT vs. surgery vs. drug therapy) of 70.7% (95% CI: 64.2-76.1%) vs. 78.6% (74.2-82.3%) ( = 0.1198) vs. 49.0% (43.4-54.4%) ( = 0.0001); 47.1% (40.9-53.0%) vs. 56.3% (48.8-63.1%) ( = 0.1265) vs. 25.3% (19.7-31.3%) ( = 0.0011); and 36.6% (27.0-46.3%) vs. 46.8% (41.7-51.6%) ( = 0.1213) vs. 14.7% (8.3-22.7%) ( = 0.0021), respectively. And the 1-3-year local control rates for PT were 89.4% (95% CI: 81.3-94.1%), 74.6% (63.0-83.1%) and 67.1% (51.4-78.7%), respectively. Meta-regression analysis was performed using modality (PT vs. surgery vs. drug therapy), male: female ratio, and median age as risk factors. The results showed no significant difference between surgery and PT, but drug therapy showed significantly lower 1- and 2-year OS rates and median survival time, and a trend toward lower 3-year OS.
The results of this analysis suggest that PT for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma may be one of the standard treatments in unresectable cases and in combination with drug therapy.
肝内胆管癌的粒子治疗(PT)有望实现良好的局部控制。然而,将PT与当前的标准治疗方式(手术和化疗)进行比较存在困难。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析和文献系统综述,以比较PT与手术及药物治疗。
使用2010年至2024年期间对肝内胆管癌进行PT或手术或药物治疗的研究进行荟萃分析。基于根治性手术或一线药物治疗的使用情况,选择了40篇文章(7篇PT、13篇手术、19篇药物治疗、1篇手术及药物治疗)。PT主要用于不可切除的病例,80%的药物治疗病例有远处转移。
40篇入选文章发现,1 - 3年总生存率(PT vs.手术vs.药物治疗)分别为70.7%(95%CI:64.2 - 76.1%)vs. 78.6%(74.2 - 82.3%)(P = 0.1198)vs. 49.0%(43.4 - 54.4%)(P = 0.0001);47.1%(40.9 - 53.0%)vs. 56.3%(48.8 - 63.1%)(P = 0.1265)vs. 25.3%(19.7 - 31.3%)(P = 0.0011);以及36.6%(27.0 - 46.3%)vs. 46.8%(41.7 - 51.6%)(P = 0.1213)vs. 14.7%(8.3 - 22.7%)(P = 0.0021)。PT的1 - 3年局部控制率分别为89.4%(95%CI:81.3 - 94.1%)、74.6%(63.0 - 83.1%)和67.1%(51.4 - 78.7%)。使用治疗方式(PT vs.手术vs.药物治疗)、男女比例和中位年龄作为风险因素进行荟萃回归分析。结果显示手术和PT之间无显著差异,但药物治疗的1年和2年总生存率及中位生存时间显著较低,且3年总生存率有降低趋势。
该分析结果表明,肝内胆管癌的PT可能是不可切除病例及与药物治疗联合应用时的标准治疗方法之一。