Mostafa Karim, Voran Jakob Christoph, Müller Markus, Pohlmeyer Anka, Noormalal Marie, Salem Mostafa, Saad Mohammed, Langguth Patrick, Frank Derk, Wolf Carmen, Seoudy Hatim
Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, UKSH Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24015, Kiel, Germany.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025 Sep;41(9):1729-1738. doi: 10.1007/s10554-025-03471-1. Epub 2025 Aug 1.
Computed tomography (CT) angiography remains a cornerstone of pre-interventional assessment for transaortic valve implantation (TAVI). CT imaging prior to TAVI further allows for evaluation of the coronary arteries, with the simplest method being the calculation of the coronary Agatston score. Following the expansion of TAVI to lower risk patients, non-invasive coronary diagnostics in the framework of TAVI gain importance as they may allow patients to avoid unnecessary invasive coronary angiography (ICA) before the procedure. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of coronary Agatston score values on pre-TAVI CT scans for the assessment of coronary artery disease. A total of 285 patients received a standard TAVI evaluation CT scan and routine ICA prior to the TAVI procedure. Agatston score values of the coronary tree and the proximal coronary segments (1, 5, 6, 11) were calculated separately by two radiologists. Reference for the AUC analysis was performance of PCI or stenting of the corresponding coronary segment following the recommendation of the Heart Team. ROC-analysis was performed for evaluation of the Agatston score at the level of the heart, the coronary arteries and the proximal coronary vessel segments (1, 5, 6 and 11) level to determine cutoff-values for optimal sensitivity and specificity. A total of 285 patients received a standard TAVI evaluation CT scan and routine ICA prior to the TAVI procedure. Agatston score values of the coronary tree and the proximal coronary segments (1, 5, 6, 11) were calculated separately by two radiologists. Reference for the AUC analysis was performance of PCI or stenting of the corresponding coronary segment following the recommendation of the Heart Team. ROC-analysis was performed for evaluation of the Agatston score at the level of the heart, the coronary arteries and the proximal coronary vessel segments (1, 5, 6 and 11) level to determine cutoff-values for optimal sensitivity and specificity. Coronary artery disease requiring intervention was present in 61 patients upon ICA (17.9%). In predicting the need of performance of a coronary intervention at a sensitivity of >89%, Agatston values of the full coronary tree >170 allow for a sensitivity of 90% (AUC 0.76, NPV 0.93). The sum Agatston score of the proximal segments >117 enables a sensitivity of 90% (AUC 0.74, NPV 0.93) and >47 a sensitivity of 98% (NPV 0.98). On the segmental level, Agatston values of >22 in the proximal RCA and >30 in the proximal LAD and CX allow for a sensitivity of 90% (AUC RCA 0.74, NPV 0.98; LAD 0.71, NPV 0.94; CX 0.75, NPV 0.99). Aiming for 98% sensitivity or higher, Agatston values of >2 for the RCA, >3 for the LAD and >27 for the CX apply (RCA NPV 1; LAD NPV 0.97; CX NPV 1). Coronary artery Agatston scoring on TAVI evaluation CT scans can serve as a predictor for the need of coronary interventions in the workup leading up to TAVI and it provides valuable information for identification of patients without significant coronary artery disease and may aid in allowing for the avoidance of invasive coronary artery diagnostics.
计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影仍是经主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)介入前评估的基石。TAVI术前的CT成像还可用于评估冠状动脉,最简单的方法是计算冠状动脉阿加西评分。随着TAVI扩展至低风险患者,TAVI框架下的非侵入性冠状动脉诊断变得愈发重要,因为这可能使患者在手术前避免不必要的侵入性冠状动脉造影(ICA)。本研究评估了TAVI术前CT扫描中冠状动脉阿加西评分值对冠状动脉疾病评估的诊断性能。共有285例患者在TAVI手术前接受了标准的TAVI评估CT扫描和常规ICA。两名放射科医生分别计算冠状动脉树和近端冠状动脉节段(1、5、6、11)的阿加西评分值。AUC分析的参考标准是根据心脏团队的建议对相应冠状动脉节段进行PCI或支架置入术的情况。进行ROC分析以评估心脏、冠状动脉和近端冠状动脉血管节段(1、5、6和11)水平的阿加西评分,以确定最佳敏感性和特异性的临界值。共有285例患者在TAVI手术前接受了标准的TAVI评估CT扫描和常规ICA。两名放射科医生分别计算冠状动脉树和近端冠状动脉节段(1、5、6、11)的阿加西评分值。AUC分析的参考标准是根据心脏团队的建议对相应冠状动脉节段进行PCI或支架置入术的情况。进行ROC分析以评估心脏、冠状动脉和近端冠状动脉血管节段(1、5、6和11)水平的阿加西评分,以确定最佳敏感性和特异性的临界值。ICA检查发现61例患者(17.9%)存在需要干预的冠状动脉疾病。在预测冠状动脉干预需求时,若敏感性>89%,整个冠状动脉树的阿加西值>170时敏感性为90%(AUC为0.76,NPV为0.93)。近端节段的阿加西评分总和>117时敏感性为90%(AUC为0.74,NPV为0.93),>47时敏感性为98%(NPV为0.98)。在节段水平上,近端右冠状动脉(RCA)的阿加西值>22、近端左前降支(LAD)和近端回旋支(CX)的阿加西值>30时敏感性为90%(RCA的AUC为0.74,NPV为0.98;LAD的AUC为0.71,NPV为0.94;CX的AUC为0.75,NPV为0.99)。若目标敏感性为98%或更高,RCA的阿加西值>2、LAD的阿加西值>3、CX的阿加西值>27适用(RCA的NPV为1;LAD的NPV为0.97;CX的NPV为1)。TAVI评估CT扫描上的冠状动脉阿加西评分可作为TAVI术前检查中冠状动脉干预需求的预测指标,为识别无明显冠状动脉疾病的患者提供有价值的信息,并可能有助于避免侵入性冠状动脉诊断。